对96个国家COVID-19和其他传染病死亡率结果的联合外部评估进行评估。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yuri Lee, Siwoo Kim, Sieun Lee, Min Kyung Kim, Lawrence O Gostin, Juhwan Oh
{"title":"对96个国家COVID-19和其他传染病死亡率结果的联合外部评估进行评估。","authors":"Yuri Lee, Siwoo Kim, Sieun Lee, Min Kyung Kim, Lawrence O Gostin, Juhwan Oh","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihae077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of Joint External Evaluation (JEE) scores with regard to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other infectious diseases performance in 96 countries. To propose a revised JEE tool, potential JEE indicators were also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>JEE data from 2016-2019 were linked with outcomes such as COVID-19 fatality rates and infections, as well as mortality rates for other infectious diseases. We also examined potential indicators such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Universal Health Coverage index to propose enhancements to the JEE tool. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess these associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average JEE score was 2.70 (SD=0.92) in 96 countries. Detection capabilities received the highest average score (3.23), while the other areas (2.30) section received the lowest scores. However, the analysis revealed that the JEE tool had limited predictive accuracy for COVID-19 outcomes. By contrast, the JEE scores showed a negative association with the performance of other infectious diseases. Notably, SDGs 2 (zero hunger), 4 (quality education) and 8 (decent work and economic growth) were strongly associated with better COVID-19 outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The JEE scores showed limited predictive value for COVID-19 mortality outcomes in 96 countries. The tool offers insights into health security, but needs revision to better handle future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of joint external evaluation to COVID-19 and other infectious diseases mortality outcomes in 96 countries.\",\"authors\":\"Yuri Lee, Siwoo Kim, Sieun Lee, Min Kyung Kim, Lawrence O Gostin, Juhwan Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/inthealth/ihae077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of Joint External Evaluation (JEE) scores with regard to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other infectious diseases performance in 96 countries. To propose a revised JEE tool, potential JEE indicators were also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>JEE data from 2016-2019 were linked with outcomes such as COVID-19 fatality rates and infections, as well as mortality rates for other infectious diseases. We also examined potential indicators such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Universal Health Coverage index to propose enhancements to the JEE tool. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess these associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average JEE score was 2.70 (SD=0.92) in 96 countries. Detection capabilities received the highest average score (3.23), while the other areas (2.30) section received the lowest scores. However, the analysis revealed that the JEE tool had limited predictive accuracy for COVID-19 outcomes. By contrast, the JEE scores showed a negative association with the performance of other infectious diseases. Notably, SDGs 2 (zero hunger), 4 (quality education) and 8 (decent work and economic growth) were strongly associated with better COVID-19 outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The JEE scores showed limited predictive value for COVID-19 mortality outcomes in 96 countries. The tool offers insights into health security, but needs revision to better handle future pandemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihae077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihae077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了联合外部评估(JEE)评分在96个国家对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和其他传染病绩效的有效性。为了提出一个修订的JEE工具,还研究了潜在的JEE指标。方法:2016-2019年的JEE数据与COVID-19死亡率和感染率以及其他传染病死亡率等结果相关联。我们还研究了可持续发展目标(SDGs)和全民健康覆盖指数等潜在指标,以提出对JEE工具的改进。采用多元回归分析来评估这些关联。结果:96个国家的平均JEE得分为2.70 (SD=0.92)。平均得分最高的是“检测能力”(3.23分),最低的是“其他领域”(2.30分)。然而,分析显示,JEE工具对COVID-19结果的预测准确性有限。相比之下,JEE得分与其他传染病的表现呈负相关。值得注意的是,可持续发展目标2(零饥饿)、4(优质教育)和8(体面工作和经济增长)与更好的COVID-19结果密切相关。结论:JEE评分对96个国家COVID-19死亡结果的预测价值有限。该工具提供了对卫生安全的见解,但需要修改以更好地应对未来的大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of joint external evaluation to COVID-19 and other infectious diseases mortality outcomes in 96 countries.

Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Joint External Evaluation (JEE) scores with regard to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other infectious diseases performance in 96 countries. To propose a revised JEE tool, potential JEE indicators were also examined.

Methods: JEE data from 2016-2019 were linked with outcomes such as COVID-19 fatality rates and infections, as well as mortality rates for other infectious diseases. We also examined potential indicators such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Universal Health Coverage index to propose enhancements to the JEE tool. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess these associations.

Results: The average JEE score was 2.70 (SD=0.92) in 96 countries. Detection capabilities received the highest average score (3.23), while the other areas (2.30) section received the lowest scores. However, the analysis revealed that the JEE tool had limited predictive accuracy for COVID-19 outcomes. By contrast, the JEE scores showed a negative association with the performance of other infectious diseases. Notably, SDGs 2 (zero hunger), 4 (quality education) and 8 (decent work and economic growth) were strongly associated with better COVID-19 outcomes.

Conclusion: The JEE scores showed limited predictive value for COVID-19 mortality outcomes in 96 countries. The tool offers insights into health security, but needs revision to better handle future pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信