减少急诊科无症状细菌的过度治疗的去实施策略:一项楔步聚类随机试验

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361241293687
Tessa M Z X K van Horrik, Bart J Laan, Janneke E Stalenhoef, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Joppe B Saanen, Caroline Schneeberger, Eefje Jong, Suzanne E Geerlings
{"title":"减少急诊科无症状细菌的过度治疗的去实施策略:一项楔步聚类随机试验","authors":"Tessa M Z X K van Horrik, Bart J Laan, Janneke E Stalenhoef, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Joppe B Saanen, Caroline Schneeberger, Eefje Jong, Suzanne E Geerlings","doi":"10.1177/20499361241293687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is the presence of bacteria in the urine of patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Generally, treating ASB is not beneficial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to reduce overtreatment of ASB in the emergency department (ED) through a multifaceted de-implementation strategy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed our study in five EDs in the Netherlands from December 2020 to December 2021. Adult patients with urine cultures obtained during ED presentation were screened for inclusion and we excluded patients with indications for antibiotic therapy. The de-implementation strategy included education, reminders and competitive feedback on baseline results. The primary endpoint was patients with ASB treated with antibiotics. Secondary endpoints included the treatment duration and the number of urine tests ordered (urinalyses and urine cultures) in the ED per 1000 adult patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6837 urine cultures were screened. ASB was present in 224/3289 (7%) and 201/3548 (6%) patients, from whom 65/224 (29%) and 46/201 (23%) were inappropriately treated with antibiotics in the baseline and intervention period, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.62, <i>p</i> = 0.65). The number of urinalyses ordered decreased from 182 to 153 per 1000 patients (incidence rate difference -29.10, 95% CI -46.36 to -11.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Further, the treatment duration was shortened for patients with ASB in the intervention period (baseline period: 7.98 days (standard deviation (SD) 4.31) vs 5.79 days (SD 3.33), <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic stewardship by our de-implementation strategy reduced the number of urinalyses ordered and treatment duration in the ED, but we found no significant reduction in overtreatment of ASB.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25918, on 17-12-2019, registration number NL8242. The first participants were enrolled on 01-12-2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20499361241293687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-implementation strategy to reduce overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the emergency department: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tessa M Z X K van Horrik, Bart J Laan, Janneke E Stalenhoef, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Joppe B Saanen, Caroline Schneeberger, Eefje Jong, Suzanne E Geerlings\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20499361241293687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is the presence of bacteria in the urine of patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Generally, treating ASB is not beneficial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to reduce overtreatment of ASB in the emergency department (ED) through a multifaceted de-implementation strategy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed our study in five EDs in the Netherlands from December 2020 to December 2021. Adult patients with urine cultures obtained during ED presentation were screened for inclusion and we excluded patients with indications for antibiotic therapy. The de-implementation strategy included education, reminders and competitive feedback on baseline results. The primary endpoint was patients with ASB treated with antibiotics. Secondary endpoints included the treatment duration and the number of urine tests ordered (urinalyses and urine cultures) in the ED per 1000 adult patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6837 urine cultures were screened. ASB was present in 224/3289 (7%) and 201/3548 (6%) patients, from whom 65/224 (29%) and 46/201 (23%) were inappropriately treated with antibiotics in the baseline and intervention period, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.62, <i>p</i> = 0.65). The number of urinalyses ordered decreased from 182 to 153 per 1000 patients (incidence rate difference -29.10, 95% CI -46.36 to -11.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Further, the treatment duration was shortened for patients with ASB in the intervention period (baseline period: 7.98 days (standard deviation (SD) 4.31) vs 5.79 days (SD 3.33), <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic stewardship by our de-implementation strategy reduced the number of urinalyses ordered and treatment duration in the ED, but we found no significant reduction in overtreatment of ASB.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25918, on 17-12-2019, registration number NL8242. The first participants were enrolled on 01-12-2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20499361241293687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645715/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241293687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241293687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无症状菌尿(ASB)是指患者尿液中存在细菌,但无尿路感染症状。一般来说,治疗无症状菌尿无益:我们旨在通过多方面的去实施策略,减少急诊科(ED)对无症状菌尿的过度治疗:设计:阶梯式分组随机试验:2020年12月至2021年12月,我们在荷兰的五家急诊科进行了研究。我们筛选了在急诊室就诊时获得尿培养的成人患者,并排除了有抗生素治疗指征的患者。去实施策略包括教育、提醒和对基线结果的竞争性反馈。主要终点是接受抗生素治疗的 ASB 患者。次要终点包括治疗持续时间和每 1000 名成人患者在急诊室接受尿检(尿液分析和尿培养)的次数:结果:共筛查出 6837 例尿培养。224/3289(7%)和201/3548(6%)名患者存在ASB,在基线和干预期间,分别有65/224(29%)和46/201(23%)名患者接受了不适当的抗生素治疗(调整后的几率比1.20,95% CI 0.56-2.62,P = 0.65)。每 1000 名患者的尿检次数从 182 次降至 153 次(发生率差异为 -29.10,95% CI 为 -46.36 至 -11.78,P = 0.006):结论:我们的 "去执行化 "诊断管理策略减少了急诊室开具尿检单的次数和治疗时间,但我们并未发现ASB过度治疗的显著减少:该试验于2019年12月17日在https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25918,注册号为NL8242。首批参与者于2020年12月1日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
De-implementation strategy to reduce overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the emergency department: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is the presence of bacteria in the urine of patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Generally, treating ASB is not beneficial.

Objective: We aimed to reduce overtreatment of ASB in the emergency department (ED) through a multifaceted de-implementation strategy.

Design: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

Methods: We performed our study in five EDs in the Netherlands from December 2020 to December 2021. Adult patients with urine cultures obtained during ED presentation were screened for inclusion and we excluded patients with indications for antibiotic therapy. The de-implementation strategy included education, reminders and competitive feedback on baseline results. The primary endpoint was patients with ASB treated with antibiotics. Secondary endpoints included the treatment duration and the number of urine tests ordered (urinalyses and urine cultures) in the ED per 1000 adult patients.

Results: In total, 6837 urine cultures were screened. ASB was present in 224/3289 (7%) and 201/3548 (6%) patients, from whom 65/224 (29%) and 46/201 (23%) were inappropriately treated with antibiotics in the baseline and intervention period, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.62, p = 0.65). The number of urinalyses ordered decreased from 182 to 153 per 1000 patients (incidence rate difference -29.10, 95% CI -46.36 to -11.78, p < 0.001). Further, the treatment duration was shortened for patients with ASB in the intervention period (baseline period: 7.98 days (standard deviation (SD) 4.31) vs 5.79 days (SD 3.33), p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Diagnostic stewardship by our de-implementation strategy reduced the number of urinalyses ordered and treatment duration in the ED, but we found no significant reduction in overtreatment of ASB.

Trial registration: The trial was registered at https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25918, on 17-12-2019, registration number NL8242. The first participants were enrolled on 01-12-2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信