采用强迫选择问卷进行心理评估的排序强迫选择诊断分类模型。

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Yi-An Zhu, Jingwan Xu, Daxun Wang, Xin Li, Yan Cai, Dongbo Tu
{"title":"采用强迫选择问卷进行心理评估的排序强迫选择诊断分类模型。","authors":"Yi-An Zhu, Jingwan Xu, Daxun Wang, Xin Li, Yan Cai, Dongbo Tu","doi":"10.1111/bmsp.12376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic classification model (DCM) has been widely utilized in non-cognitive tests, offering diagnostic information on latent attributes. However, the model's reliance on single-stimulus (SS) items may lead to response biases (e.g., social desirability), jeopardizing the psychometric properties. As an alternative to SS scales, forced choice questionnaires (FCQ) can effectively control response biases. The combination of FCQs and the DCM not only circumvents response bias but also yields fine-grained diagnostic information on latent attributes. To the best of our knowledge, only one study (Huang, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 83, 2022, 146) has explored this topic and developed a DCM for forced choice (FC) items. However, the existing model has limitations in terms of its modelling assumption, the FC format and the number of attributes measured by statement. To address these limitations, this study proposes a ranking FC-DCM that (1) adopts a generalized assumption, (2) covers all FC formats and (3) eases the limitation on the number of attributes measured by each statement. The simulation study demonstrated that the proposed model exhibited satisfactory person and item parameter recovery under all conditions. This study provided an illustrative example by developing an FC version questionnaire to further explore the applications and advantages of the proposed model in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55322,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A ranking forced choice diagnostic classification model for psychological assessment using forced choice questionnaires.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-An Zhu, Jingwan Xu, Daxun Wang, Xin Li, Yan Cai, Dongbo Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bmsp.12376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnostic classification model (DCM) has been widely utilized in non-cognitive tests, offering diagnostic information on latent attributes. However, the model's reliance on single-stimulus (SS) items may lead to response biases (e.g., social desirability), jeopardizing the psychometric properties. As an alternative to SS scales, forced choice questionnaires (FCQ) can effectively control response biases. The combination of FCQs and the DCM not only circumvents response bias but also yields fine-grained diagnostic information on latent attributes. To the best of our knowledge, only one study (Huang, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 83, 2022, 146) has explored this topic and developed a DCM for forced choice (FC) items. However, the existing model has limitations in terms of its modelling assumption, the FC format and the number of attributes measured by statement. To address these limitations, this study proposes a ranking FC-DCM that (1) adopts a generalized assumption, (2) covers all FC formats and (3) eases the limitation on the number of attributes measured by each statement. The simulation study demonstrated that the proposed model exhibited satisfactory person and item parameter recovery under all conditions. This study provided an illustrative example by developing an FC version questionnaire to further explore the applications and advantages of the proposed model in real-world settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12376\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诊断分类模型(DCM)在非认知测试中得到了广泛的应用,它提供了潜在属性的诊断信息。然而,该模型对单一刺激(SS)项目的依赖可能导致反应偏差(如社会期望),危及心理测量特性。强迫选择问卷(FCQ)作为SS量表的替代,可以有效地控制反应偏差。FCQs和DCM的结合不仅避免了反应偏差,而且还产生了对潜在属性的细粒度诊断信息。据我们所知,只有一项研究。Psychol。量。, 83,2022, 146)已经探讨了这一主题,并开发了强制选择(FC)项目的DCM。然而,现有模型在建模假设、FC格式和语句度量的属性数量等方面存在局限性。为了解决这些限制,本研究提出了一种排名FC- dcm,该排名FC- dcm(1)采用广义假设,(2)涵盖所有FC格式,(3)减轻了每个语句测量属性数量的限制。仿真研究表明,该模型在各种条件下均具有较好的人、项参数恢复效果。本研究提供了一个说明性的例子,通过开发一个FC版本的问卷来进一步探索所提出的模型在现实环境中的应用和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A ranking forced choice diagnostic classification model for psychological assessment using forced choice questionnaires.

The diagnostic classification model (DCM) has been widely utilized in non-cognitive tests, offering diagnostic information on latent attributes. However, the model's reliance on single-stimulus (SS) items may lead to response biases (e.g., social desirability), jeopardizing the psychometric properties. As an alternative to SS scales, forced choice questionnaires (FCQ) can effectively control response biases. The combination of FCQs and the DCM not only circumvents response bias but also yields fine-grained diagnostic information on latent attributes. To the best of our knowledge, only one study (Huang, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 83, 2022, 146) has explored this topic and developed a DCM for forced choice (FC) items. However, the existing model has limitations in terms of its modelling assumption, the FC format and the number of attributes measured by statement. To address these limitations, this study proposes a ranking FC-DCM that (1) adopts a generalized assumption, (2) covers all FC formats and (3) eases the limitation on the number of attributes measured by each statement. The simulation study demonstrated that the proposed model exhibited satisfactory person and item parameter recovery under all conditions. This study provided an illustrative example by developing an FC version questionnaire to further explore the applications and advantages of the proposed model in real-world settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology publishes articles relating to areas of psychology which have a greater mathematical or statistical aspect of their argument than is usually acceptable to other journals including: • mathematical psychology • statistics • psychometrics • decision making • psychophysics • classification • relevant areas of mathematics, computing and computer software These include articles that address substantitive psychological issues or that develop and extend techniques useful to psychologists. New models for psychological processes, new approaches to existing data, critiques of existing models and improved algorithms for estimating the parameters of a model are examples of articles which may be favoured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信