不良妊娠结局与认知障碍和痴呆症之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Eliza C Miller, Patrick Conley, Mohammad Alirezaei, Katrin Wolfova, Mitzi M Gonzales, Zaldy S Tan, Sarah E Tom, Lynn M Yee, Adam M Brickman, Natalie A Bello
{"title":"不良妊娠结局与认知障碍和痴呆症之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Eliza C Miller, Patrick Conley, Mohammad Alirezaei, Katrin Wolfova, Mitzi M Gonzales, Zaldy S Tan, Sarah E Tom, Lynn M Yee, Adam M Brickman, Natalie A Bello","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with adverse pregnancy outcomes have an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, but the association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and cognitive impairment and dementia is less well established. We aimed to synthesise, combine, and assess the growing body of data examining the associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and mild cognitive impairment and dementia in parous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Embase from database inception up to July 18, 2024, with no language restrictions, for observational studies or clinical trials that reported mild cognitive impairment or dementia as outcomes and included female individuals or women who had an adverse pregnancy outcome, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, or placental abruption. We excluded studies of men, nulliparous women, women with pre-pregnancy conditions associated with impaired cognition, and studies examining cognitive impairment within 6 months of pregnancy. Database searches were supplemented by manual review of the reference lists of included studies. If studies met eligibility criteria but did not have sufficient data for meta-analysis (ie, did not report a summary statistic or a hazard ratio [HR] for outcome estimation), they were included in the systematic review and excluded from the meta-analysis. After removing duplicates, two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence software, with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text review by the same reviewers, with further review by a third reviewer and disagreements resolved by discussion and group consensus. Study quality was assessed and summary statistics extracted by two reviewers independently. The primary outcomes of our study were mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia. Heterogeneity was measured using the Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and we used random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting to assess the association between adverse pregnancy outcome and primary outcomes with sufficient meta-analysable data via pooled adjusted HRs and 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023453511.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 11 251 publications identified, 15 studies (including 7 347 202 participants) met inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 11 studies (6 263 431 participants) had sufficient data for meta-analysis. A history of any adverse pregnancy outcome was associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (adjusted HR 1·32 [95% CI 1·17-1·49]; I<sup>2</sup>= 80%), Alzheimer's disease (1·26 [1·04-1·53]; I<sup>2</sup>=63%), and vascular dementia (1·94 [1·70-2·21]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). A history of any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy was significantly associated with all-cause dementia (1·32 [1·11-1·57]; I<sup>2</sup>=74%) and vascular dementia (1·78 [1·46-2·17]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%), but not Alzheimer's disease (1·24 [0·98-1·57]; I<sup>2</sup>=66%). Stillbirth was not significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (1·26 [95% CI 0·93-1·71]; I<sup>2</sup>=62%). In individual studies, similar effect directions were observed for preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, but data were insufficient for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Given their increased risk of dementia, women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes should be evaluated for additional dementia risk factors and monitored closely for any signs of cognitive decline. Furthermore, to obtain more reliable findings, future studies should measure both exposures and outcomes prospectively and objectively.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute on Aging, and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.</p>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":" ","pages":"100660"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eliza C Miller, Patrick Conley, Mohammad Alirezaei, Katrin Wolfova, Mitzi M Gonzales, Zaldy S Tan, Sarah E Tom, Lynn M Yee, Adam M Brickman, Natalie A Bello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with adverse pregnancy outcomes have an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, but the association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and cognitive impairment and dementia is less well established. We aimed to synthesise, combine, and assess the growing body of data examining the associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and mild cognitive impairment and dementia in parous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Embase from database inception up to July 18, 2024, with no language restrictions, for observational studies or clinical trials that reported mild cognitive impairment or dementia as outcomes and included female individuals or women who had an adverse pregnancy outcome, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, or placental abruption. We excluded studies of men, nulliparous women, women with pre-pregnancy conditions associated with impaired cognition, and studies examining cognitive impairment within 6 months of pregnancy. Database searches were supplemented by manual review of the reference lists of included studies. If studies met eligibility criteria but did not have sufficient data for meta-analysis (ie, did not report a summary statistic or a hazard ratio [HR] for outcome estimation), they were included in the systematic review and excluded from the meta-analysis. After removing duplicates, two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence software, with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text review by the same reviewers, with further review by a third reviewer and disagreements resolved by discussion and group consensus. Study quality was assessed and summary statistics extracted by two reviewers independently. The primary outcomes of our study were mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia. Heterogeneity was measured using the Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and we used random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting to assess the association between adverse pregnancy outcome and primary outcomes with sufficient meta-analysable data via pooled adjusted HRs and 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023453511.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 11 251 publications identified, 15 studies (including 7 347 202 participants) met inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 11 studies (6 263 431 participants) had sufficient data for meta-analysis. A history of any adverse pregnancy outcome was associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (adjusted HR 1·32 [95% CI 1·17-1·49]; I<sup>2</sup>= 80%), Alzheimer's disease (1·26 [1·04-1·53]; I<sup>2</sup>=63%), and vascular dementia (1·94 [1·70-2·21]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). A history of any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy was significantly associated with all-cause dementia (1·32 [1·11-1·57]; I<sup>2</sup>=74%) and vascular dementia (1·78 [1·46-2·17]; I<sup>2</sup>=0%), but not Alzheimer's disease (1·24 [0·98-1·57]; I<sup>2</sup>=66%). Stillbirth was not significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (1·26 [95% CI 0·93-1·71]; I<sup>2</sup>=62%). In individual studies, similar effect directions were observed for preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, but data were insufficient for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Given their increased risk of dementia, women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes should be evaluated for additional dementia risk factors and monitored closely for any signs of cognitive decline. Furthermore, to obtain more reliable findings, future studies should measure both exposures and outcomes prospectively and objectively.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute on Aging, and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Individuals with adverse pregnancy outcomes have an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, but the association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and cognitive impairment and dementia is less well established. We aimed to synthesise, combine, and assess the growing body of data examining the associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and mild cognitive impairment and dementia in parous women.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Embase from database inception up to July 18, 2024, with no language restrictions, for observational studies or clinical trials that reported mild cognitive impairment or dementia as outcomes and included female individuals or women who had an adverse pregnancy outcome, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, or placental abruption. We excluded studies of men, nulliparous women, women with pre-pregnancy conditions associated with impaired cognition, and studies examining cognitive impairment within 6 months of pregnancy. Database searches were supplemented by manual review of the reference lists of included studies. If studies met eligibility criteria but did not have sufficient data for meta-analysis (ie, did not report a summary statistic or a hazard ratio [HR] for outcome estimation), they were included in the systematic review and excluded from the meta-analysis. After removing duplicates, two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence software, with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text review by the same reviewers, with further review by a third reviewer and disagreements resolved by discussion and group consensus. Study quality was assessed and summary statistics extracted by two reviewers independently. The primary outcomes of our study were mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia. Heterogeneity was measured using the Q test and I2 statistic, and we used random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting to assess the association between adverse pregnancy outcome and primary outcomes with sufficient meta-analysable data via pooled adjusted HRs and 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023453511.

Findings: Of 11 251 publications identified, 15 studies (including 7 347 202 participants) met inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 11 studies (6 263 431 participants) had sufficient data for meta-analysis. A history of any adverse pregnancy outcome was associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (adjusted HR 1·32 [95% CI 1·17-1·49]; I2= 80%), Alzheimer's disease (1·26 [1·04-1·53]; I2=63%), and vascular dementia (1·94 [1·70-2·21]; I2=0%). A history of any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy was significantly associated with all-cause dementia (1·32 [1·11-1·57]; I2=74%) and vascular dementia (1·78 [1·46-2·17]; I2=0%), but not Alzheimer's disease (1·24 [0·98-1·57]; I2=66%). Stillbirth was not significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (1·26 [95% CI 0·93-1·71]; I2=62%). In individual studies, similar effect directions were observed for preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, but data were insufficient for meta-analysis.

Interpretation: Given their increased risk of dementia, women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes should be evaluated for additional dementia risk factors and monitored closely for any signs of cognitive decline. Furthermore, to obtain more reliable findings, future studies should measure both exposures and outcomes prospectively and objectively.

Funding: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute on Aging, and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
Lancet Healthy Longevity GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
192
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信