针对LGBTQ+人群心理健康的循证认知和/或行为干预的系统综述

Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.11323
Carina Tudor-Sfetea, Raluca Topciu
{"title":"针对LGBTQ+人群心理健康的循证认知和/或行为干预的系统综述","authors":"Carina Tudor-Sfetea, Raluca Topciu","doi":"10.32872/cpe.11323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a minority stress-related higher risk to develop mental health difficulties, and problematic access to and treatment from healthcare providers, research into LGBTQ+ mental health support is limited. The aims of this systematic review were to explore evidence-based cognitive and/or behavioural interventions and adaptations targeting mental health in LGBTQ+ populations, before providing recommendations for future clinical and research directions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Six databases were searched in February-March 2022 and risk of bias evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2/ROBINS-I tools. A narrative synthesis following the PICOS framework and the review questions was used to examine the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including various interventions and adaptations, mental health difficulties, and other emotion- and minority stress-related processes/constructs. Risk of bias was judged as high, and critical/serious, respectively, in all studies. Outcomes included improvements in symptoms of depression (most statistically/clinically significant effects/large effect sizes), and anxiety, emotion regulation, and internalised homophobia in the pre-post studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cognitive/behavioural interventions and adaptations for LGBTQ+ populations feature a range of therapeutic modalities and levels of adaptation, with largely positive effects, in the context of limited and heterogenous literature and risk of bias concerns, as well as limitations related to publication bias and inclusion criteria of the current work. Suggestions for future clinical and research directions include a focus on generic therapeutic competencies and metacompetencies, and affirmative, potentially more holistic approaches, as well as more consistency in methodology, more focus on underserved LGBTQ+ populations and intersectionality, and more detailed investigations into mechanisms of change.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 3","pages":"e11323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Cognitive and/or Behavioural Interventions Targeting Mental Health in LGBTQ+ Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Carina Tudor-Sfetea, Raluca Topciu\",\"doi\":\"10.32872/cpe.11323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a minority stress-related higher risk to develop mental health difficulties, and problematic access to and treatment from healthcare providers, research into LGBTQ+ mental health support is limited. The aims of this systematic review were to explore evidence-based cognitive and/or behavioural interventions and adaptations targeting mental health in LGBTQ+ populations, before providing recommendations for future clinical and research directions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Six databases were searched in February-March 2022 and risk of bias evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2/ROBINS-I tools. A narrative synthesis following the PICOS framework and the review questions was used to examine the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including various interventions and adaptations, mental health difficulties, and other emotion- and minority stress-related processes/constructs. Risk of bias was judged as high, and critical/serious, respectively, in all studies. Outcomes included improvements in symptoms of depression (most statistically/clinically significant effects/large effect sizes), and anxiety, emotion regulation, and internalised homophobia in the pre-post studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cognitive/behavioural interventions and adaptations for LGBTQ+ populations feature a range of therapeutic modalities and levels of adaptation, with largely positive effects, in the context of limited and heterogenous literature and risk of bias concerns, as well as limitations related to publication bias and inclusion criteria of the current work. Suggestions for future clinical and research directions include a focus on generic therapeutic competencies and metacompetencies, and affirmative, potentially more holistic approaches, as well as more consistency in methodology, more focus on underserved LGBTQ+ populations and intersectionality, and more detailed investigations into mechanisms of change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology in Europe\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"e11323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管少数群体因压力过大而面临更高的心理健康问题风险,而且在获得医疗服务提供者的帮助和治疗方面也存在问题,但有关 LGBTQ+ 心理健康支持的研究却十分有限。本系统性综述旨在探讨针对LGBTQ+人群心理健康的循证认知和/或行为干预及调整,然后为未来的临床和研究方向提供建议:2022年2月至3月期间,对六个数据库进行了检索,并使用Cochrane RoB 2/ROBINS-I工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。按照 PICOS 框架和综述问题对结果进行了叙述性综合:结果:16 项研究符合纳入标准,包括各种干预和适应措施、心理健康困难以及其他与情绪和少数群体压力相关的过程/结构。所有研究的偏倚风险分别被判定为高和临界/严重。研究结果包括抑郁症状的改善(最具统计学/临床意义的效应/较大的效应大小),以及前后期研究中焦虑、情绪调节和内化的恐同症的改善:针对LGBTQ+人群的认知/行为干预和调整具有一系列治疗模式和调整水平,在文献有限和异质性、偏倚风险以及与出版偏倚和当前工作纳入标准有关的局限性的背景下,这些干预和调整在很大程度上具有积极的效果。对未来临床和研究方向的建议包括:关注通用治疗能力和元能力、肯定性的、可能更全面的方法、方法的一致性、更多关注未得到充分服务的 LGBTQ+ 群体和交叉性,以及对改变机制进行更详细的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Cognitive and/or Behavioural Interventions Targeting Mental Health in LGBTQ+ Populations.

Background: Despite a minority stress-related higher risk to develop mental health difficulties, and problematic access to and treatment from healthcare providers, research into LGBTQ+ mental health support is limited. The aims of this systematic review were to explore evidence-based cognitive and/or behavioural interventions and adaptations targeting mental health in LGBTQ+ populations, before providing recommendations for future clinical and research directions.

Method: Six databases were searched in February-March 2022 and risk of bias evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2/ROBINS-I tools. A narrative synthesis following the PICOS framework and the review questions was used to examine the results.

Results: Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including various interventions and adaptations, mental health difficulties, and other emotion- and minority stress-related processes/constructs. Risk of bias was judged as high, and critical/serious, respectively, in all studies. Outcomes included improvements in symptoms of depression (most statistically/clinically significant effects/large effect sizes), and anxiety, emotion regulation, and internalised homophobia in the pre-post studies.

Conclusion: Cognitive/behavioural interventions and adaptations for LGBTQ+ populations feature a range of therapeutic modalities and levels of adaptation, with largely positive effects, in the context of limited and heterogenous literature and risk of bias concerns, as well as limitations related to publication bias and inclusion criteria of the current work. Suggestions for future clinical and research directions include a focus on generic therapeutic competencies and metacompetencies, and affirmative, potentially more holistic approaches, as well as more consistency in methodology, more focus on underserved LGBTQ+ populations and intersectionality, and more detailed investigations into mechanisms of change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信