功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后非甾体类抗炎药物的出血风险:TriNetX数据库的分析

Q2 Medicine
World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2023-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.142
Mandy K Salmon, Jacob G Eide, Rijul S Kshirsagar, James N Palmer, Nithin D Adappa, Michael A Kohanski
{"title":"功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后非甾体类抗炎药物的出血风险:TriNetX数据库的分析","authors":"Mandy K Salmon, Jacob G Eide, Rijul S Kshirsagar, James N Palmer, Nithin D Adappa, Michael A Kohanski","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative pain medications and aspirin before undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) are managed carefully due to concern for bleeding. Little is known regarding the increase in the risk of bleeding for patients unable to stop aspirin as trials are limited in this area. We compared outcomes for patients undergoing FESS who were managed postoperatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids. We also determined the epistaxis rate for patients on aspirin at the time of surgery compared to those who were not on aspirin.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing FESS using the TriNetX database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were propensity-matched, and the odds of bleeding complications between the patients prescribed postoperative NSAIDs were compared to those prescribed opioids. We also compared postoperative odds of bleeding in patients unable to halt aspirin use at the time of surgery to those who were not on aspirin before surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51,361 patients received opioids after FESS compared to 1923 patients who received NSAIDs. After propensity matching, 1918 patients were in each group and odds of epistaxis were similar between the NSAID group and the opioid group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-1.94); 7.67% of the NSAID group required rescue opioids. Patients on aspirin who were unable to hold aspirin at surgery showed bleeding rates of 14.67% compared to 9.00% in propensity-matched controls who were not on aspirin (OR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.20-2.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NSAID use appears to be a safe alternative to opioids for patients without pre-existing risk factors for bleeding. Patients who remained on aspirin in the week before FESS had an increased risk of postoperative epistaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"10 4","pages":"303-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bleeding risk from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: Analysis of the TriNetX database.\",\"authors\":\"Mandy K Salmon, Jacob G Eide, Rijul S Kshirsagar, James N Palmer, Nithin D Adappa, Michael A Kohanski\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjo2.142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative pain medications and aspirin before undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) are managed carefully due to concern for bleeding. Little is known regarding the increase in the risk of bleeding for patients unable to stop aspirin as trials are limited in this area. We compared outcomes for patients undergoing FESS who were managed postoperatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids. We also determined the epistaxis rate for patients on aspirin at the time of surgery compared to those who were not on aspirin.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing FESS using the TriNetX database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were propensity-matched, and the odds of bleeding complications between the patients prescribed postoperative NSAIDs were compared to those prescribed opioids. We also compared postoperative odds of bleeding in patients unable to halt aspirin use at the time of surgery to those who were not on aspirin before surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51,361 patients received opioids after FESS compared to 1923 patients who received NSAIDs. After propensity matching, 1918 patients were in each group and odds of epistaxis were similar between the NSAID group and the opioid group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-1.94); 7.67% of the NSAID group required rescue opioids. Patients on aspirin who were unable to hold aspirin at surgery showed bleeding rates of 14.67% compared to 9.00% in propensity-matched controls who were not on aspirin (OR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.20-2.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NSAID use appears to be a safe alternative to opioids for patients without pre-existing risk factors for bleeding. Patients who remained on aspirin in the week before FESS had an increased risk of postoperative epistaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"303-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在进行功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)之前,由于担心出血,术后止痛药和阿司匹林的治疗是谨慎的。由于在该领域的试验有限,对于无法停止服用阿司匹林的患者出血风险的增加知之甚少。我们比较了FESS患者术后使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和阿片类药物治疗的结果。我们还测定了手术时服用阿司匹林的患者与未服用阿司匹林的患者的鼻出血率。资料来源:使用TriNetX数据库对接受FESS的患者进行回顾性分析。方法:对患者进行倾向性匹配,比较术后使用非甾体抗炎药与使用阿片类药物的患者出血并发症的发生率。我们还比较了手术时无法停止服用阿司匹林的患者与术前未服用阿司匹林的患者的术后出血几率。结果:共有51,361例患者在FESS后接受阿片类药物治疗,而1923例患者接受非甾体抗炎药治疗。倾向匹配后,每组各有1918例患者,非甾体抗炎药组和阿片类药物组发生鼻出血的几率相似(比值比[OR]: 1.32, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.90-1.94);7.67%的非甾体抗炎药组需要救援阿片类药物。手术中不能服用阿司匹林的阿司匹林患者出血率为14.67%,而不服用阿司匹林的倾向匹配对照组出血率为9.00% (OR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.20-2.51)。结论:对于没有预先存在出血危险因素的患者,使用非甾体抗炎药似乎是阿片类药物的安全替代品。在FESS前一周继续服用阿司匹林的患者术后鼻出血的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bleeding risk from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: Analysis of the TriNetX database.

Objectives: Postoperative pain medications and aspirin before undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) are managed carefully due to concern for bleeding. Little is known regarding the increase in the risk of bleeding for patients unable to stop aspirin as trials are limited in this area. We compared outcomes for patients undergoing FESS who were managed postoperatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids. We also determined the epistaxis rate for patients on aspirin at the time of surgery compared to those who were not on aspirin.

Data source: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing FESS using the TriNetX database.

Methods: Patients were propensity-matched, and the odds of bleeding complications between the patients prescribed postoperative NSAIDs were compared to those prescribed opioids. We also compared postoperative odds of bleeding in patients unable to halt aspirin use at the time of surgery to those who were not on aspirin before surgery.

Results: A total of 51,361 patients received opioids after FESS compared to 1923 patients who received NSAIDs. After propensity matching, 1918 patients were in each group and odds of epistaxis were similar between the NSAID group and the opioid group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-1.94); 7.67% of the NSAID group required rescue opioids. Patients on aspirin who were unable to hold aspirin at surgery showed bleeding rates of 14.67% compared to 9.00% in propensity-matched controls who were not on aspirin (OR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.20-2.51).

Conclusions: NSAID use appears to be a safe alternative to opioids for patients without pre-existing risk factors for bleeding. Patients who remained on aspirin in the week before FESS had an increased risk of postoperative epistaxis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信