生物制剂和Janus激酶抑制剂与炎症性肠病之间的关联是一种矛盾反应:一项真实世界的评估。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zhi-Qing Zhan, Jia-Xin Li, Ying-Xuan Chen, Jing-Yuan Fang
{"title":"生物制剂和Janus激酶抑制剂与炎症性肠病之间的关联是一种矛盾反应:一项真实世界的评估。","authors":"Zhi-Qing Zhan, Jia-Xin Li, Ying-Xuan Chen, Jing-Yuan Fang","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.12719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>With limited evidence connecting paradoxical inflammatory bowel disease (paradoxical IBD) to the newest biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, our study aims to investigate the occurrence of paradoxical IBD induced by these agents in treating other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aim to identify associated risk signals, the primary affected population, and the risk profile changes over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed disproportionality analysis to evaluate paradoxical IBD risk signals using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Stratification analyses according to IBD subtype, age, gender, and agents' indications were performed. Weibull shape parameter (WSP) test was conducted to assess paradoxical IBD risk changes over time. Linkage disequilibrium score regression and Mendelian Randomization were employed to evaluate genetic correlations and causality between these agents' indications (i.e., non-IBD IMIDs) and IBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 3296 patients reporting 3407 occurrences of paradoxical IBD following using these agents as primary suspects. Among TNF blockers, consistent positive signals for paradoxical IBD were noted: Adalimumab (n = 1983, ROR [95%CI] = 1.55 [1.47-1.63]), Infliximab (n = 545, ROR [95%CI] = 2.12 [1.95-2.32]), Certolizumab Pegol (n = 342, ROR [95%CI] = 1.9 [1.71-2.12]), and Golimumab (n = 154, ROR [95%CI] = 1.64 [1.4-1.93]). Ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 antagonist, also showed a strong positive signal (n = 155, ROR [95%CI] = 2.03 [1.73-2.39]). Conversely, Upadacitinib, Tofacitinib (Janus kinase inhibitors), and Risankizumab (IL-23 antagonist) exhibited insignificant associations with paradoxical IBD. Crohn's disease (CD) is the mainly developing form. WSP analysis identified two temporal patterns of paradoxical IBD: early failure and random failure types. Significant genetic correlations between three IMIDs and IBD were uncovered, with psoriasis specifically found to causally elevate CD risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies paradoxical IBD as a consistent positive signal across multiple IMID agents, predominantly manifesting as CD, potentially aiding in timely detection and therapeutic decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Biologics and Janus Kinase Inhibitors With Inflammatory Bowel Disease as Paradoxical Reactions: A Real-World Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi-Qing Zhan, Jia-Xin Li, Ying-Xuan Chen, Jing-Yuan Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.12719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>With limited evidence connecting paradoxical inflammatory bowel disease (paradoxical IBD) to the newest biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, our study aims to investigate the occurrence of paradoxical IBD induced by these agents in treating other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aim to identify associated risk signals, the primary affected population, and the risk profile changes over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed disproportionality analysis to evaluate paradoxical IBD risk signals using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Stratification analyses according to IBD subtype, age, gender, and agents' indications were performed. Weibull shape parameter (WSP) test was conducted to assess paradoxical IBD risk changes over time. Linkage disequilibrium score regression and Mendelian Randomization were employed to evaluate genetic correlations and causality between these agents' indications (i.e., non-IBD IMIDs) and IBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 3296 patients reporting 3407 occurrences of paradoxical IBD following using these agents as primary suspects. Among TNF blockers, consistent positive signals for paradoxical IBD were noted: Adalimumab (n = 1983, ROR [95%CI] = 1.55 [1.47-1.63]), Infliximab (n = 545, ROR [95%CI] = 2.12 [1.95-2.32]), Certolizumab Pegol (n = 342, ROR [95%CI] = 1.9 [1.71-2.12]), and Golimumab (n = 154, ROR [95%CI] = 1.64 [1.4-1.93]). Ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 antagonist, also showed a strong positive signal (n = 155, ROR [95%CI] = 2.03 [1.73-2.39]). Conversely, Upadacitinib, Tofacitinib (Janus kinase inhibitors), and Risankizumab (IL-23 antagonist) exhibited insignificant associations with paradoxical IBD. Crohn's disease (CD) is the mainly developing form. WSP analysis identified two temporal patterns of paradoxical IBD: early failure and random failure types. Significant genetic correlations between three IMIDs and IBD were uncovered, with psoriasis specifically found to causally elevate CD risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies paradoxical IBD as a consistent positive signal across multiple IMID agents, predominantly manifesting as CD, potentially aiding in timely detection and therapeutic decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12719\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:由于将悖论性炎症性肠病(悖论性IBD)与最新的生物制剂和Janus激酶抑制剂联系起来的证据有限,本研究旨在调查这些药物在治疗其他免疫介导的炎症性疾病(IMIDs)时诱导的悖论性IBD的发生情况。我们的目标是确定相关的风险信号,主要受影响人群,以及随时间变化的风险概况。方法:我们使用FDA不良事件报告系统的数据进行歧化分析,以评估矛盾的IBD风险信号。根据IBD亚型、年龄、性别和药物适应症进行分层分析。采用威布尔形状参数(WSP)检验来评估IBD风险随时间的变化。采用连锁不平衡评分回归和孟德尔随机化来评估这些药物的适应症(即非IBD IMIDs)与IBD之间的遗传相关性和因果关系。结果:该研究包括3296例患者,报告了3407例在使用这些药物作为主要嫌疑人后出现的矛盾性IBD。在TNF阻滞剂中,对悖论性IBD的一致阳性信号被注意到:阿达木单抗(n = 1983, ROR [95%CI] = 1.55[1.47-1.63])、英夫利西单抗(n = 545, ROR [95%CI] = 2.12[1.95-2.32])、Certolizumab Pegol (n = 342, ROR [95%CI] = 1.9[1.71-2.12])和Golimumab (n = 154, ROR [95%CI] = 1.64[1.4-1.93])。IL-12和IL-23拮抗剂Ustekinumab也显示出强烈的阳性信号(n = 155, ROR [95%CI] = 2.03[1.73-2.39])。相反,Upadacitinib、Tofacitinib (Janus激酶抑制剂)和Risankizumab (IL-23拮抗剂)与IBD的相关性不显著。克罗恩病(CD)是主要发展形式。WSP分析确定了矛盾IBD的两种时间模式:早期失效和随机失效类型。发现了三种IMIDs与IBD之间显著的遗传相关性,其中牛皮癣特别发现了导致CD风险升高的原因。结论:本研究确定了悖论性IBD是多种IMID药物一致的阳性信号,主要表现为CD,可能有助于及时发现和治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Biologics and Janus Kinase Inhibitors With Inflammatory Bowel Disease as Paradoxical Reactions: A Real-World Assessment.

Background and objective: With limited evidence connecting paradoxical inflammatory bowel disease (paradoxical IBD) to the newest biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, our study aims to investigate the occurrence of paradoxical IBD induced by these agents in treating other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aim to identify associated risk signals, the primary affected population, and the risk profile changes over time.

Methods: We performed disproportionality analysis to evaluate paradoxical IBD risk signals using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Stratification analyses according to IBD subtype, age, gender, and agents' indications were performed. Weibull shape parameter (WSP) test was conducted to assess paradoxical IBD risk changes over time. Linkage disequilibrium score regression and Mendelian Randomization were employed to evaluate genetic correlations and causality between these agents' indications (i.e., non-IBD IMIDs) and IBD.

Results: This study included 3296 patients reporting 3407 occurrences of paradoxical IBD following using these agents as primary suspects. Among TNF blockers, consistent positive signals for paradoxical IBD were noted: Adalimumab (n = 1983, ROR [95%CI] = 1.55 [1.47-1.63]), Infliximab (n = 545, ROR [95%CI] = 2.12 [1.95-2.32]), Certolizumab Pegol (n = 342, ROR [95%CI] = 1.9 [1.71-2.12]), and Golimumab (n = 154, ROR [95%CI] = 1.64 [1.4-1.93]). Ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 antagonist, also showed a strong positive signal (n = 155, ROR [95%CI] = 2.03 [1.73-2.39]). Conversely, Upadacitinib, Tofacitinib (Janus kinase inhibitors), and Risankizumab (IL-23 antagonist) exhibited insignificant associations with paradoxical IBD. Crohn's disease (CD) is the mainly developing form. WSP analysis identified two temporal patterns of paradoxical IBD: early failure and random failure types. Significant genetic correlations between three IMIDs and IBD were uncovered, with psoriasis specifically found to causally elevate CD risk.

Conclusions: This study identifies paradoxical IBD as a consistent positive signal across multiple IMID agents, predominantly manifesting as CD, potentially aiding in timely detection and therapeutic decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信