Elizabeth Harman, Susan M Perkins, Ahna Pai, Sheri L Robb
{"title":"简易创伤后应激障碍检查表-平民作为癌症儿童父母创伤应激筛选器的验证。","authors":"Elizabeth Harman, Susan M Perkins, Ahna Pai, Sheri L Robb","doi":"10.1177/27527530241283791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Researchers and clinicians often use the six-item abbreviated Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian (PCL-6) for screening; however, the PCL-6 has not been validated for parents of children with cancer. A valid and reliable short screener like the PCL-6 would allow bedside and/or advanced practice nurses to quickly screen parents for traumatic stress and expedite referrals for support services. <b>Method:</b> This study used data collected during a multisite trial examining an intervention for children with cancer and their parents. This dataset included parental self-report measures of traumatic stress (PCL-6; Impact of Events Scale-Revised [IES-R]), mood disturbance (Profile of Mood States-Short Form [POMS-SF]), and wellbeing (Index of Wellbeing [IWB]). The sample included 136 parents of children (3-8 years old) undergoing cancer treatment at four hospitals. <b>Analysis:</b> For construct validity, we calculated Spearman's correlation coefficient using baseline scores of the PCL-6 with baseline scores for the IES-R, POMS-SF, and IWB. For internal consistency, we calculated Cronbach's alpha using the scores of each of the six items of the PCL-6 for all parent/caregiver participants at baseline. <b>Results:</b> Results indicate good convergent construct validity, reasonable divergent construct validity, and good internal consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":"41 6","pages":"391-398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Abbreviated PTSD Checklist-Civilian as a Traumatic Stress Screener for Parents of Children With Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Harman, Susan M Perkins, Ahna Pai, Sheri L Robb\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27527530241283791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Researchers and clinicians often use the six-item abbreviated Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian (PCL-6) for screening; however, the PCL-6 has not been validated for parents of children with cancer. A valid and reliable short screener like the PCL-6 would allow bedside and/or advanced practice nurses to quickly screen parents for traumatic stress and expedite referrals for support services. <b>Method:</b> This study used data collected during a multisite trial examining an intervention for children with cancer and their parents. This dataset included parental self-report measures of traumatic stress (PCL-6; Impact of Events Scale-Revised [IES-R]), mood disturbance (Profile of Mood States-Short Form [POMS-SF]), and wellbeing (Index of Wellbeing [IWB]). The sample included 136 parents of children (3-8 years old) undergoing cancer treatment at four hospitals. <b>Analysis:</b> For construct validity, we calculated Spearman's correlation coefficient using baseline scores of the PCL-6 with baseline scores for the IES-R, POMS-SF, and IWB. For internal consistency, we calculated Cronbach's alpha using the scores of each of the six items of the PCL-6 for all parent/caregiver participants at baseline. <b>Results:</b> Results indicate good convergent construct validity, reasonable divergent construct validity, and good internal consistency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"391-398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530241283791\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530241283791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Abbreviated PTSD Checklist-Civilian as a Traumatic Stress Screener for Parents of Children With Cancer.
Background: Researchers and clinicians often use the six-item abbreviated Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian (PCL-6) for screening; however, the PCL-6 has not been validated for parents of children with cancer. A valid and reliable short screener like the PCL-6 would allow bedside and/or advanced practice nurses to quickly screen parents for traumatic stress and expedite referrals for support services. Method: This study used data collected during a multisite trial examining an intervention for children with cancer and their parents. This dataset included parental self-report measures of traumatic stress (PCL-6; Impact of Events Scale-Revised [IES-R]), mood disturbance (Profile of Mood States-Short Form [POMS-SF]), and wellbeing (Index of Wellbeing [IWB]). The sample included 136 parents of children (3-8 years old) undergoing cancer treatment at four hospitals. Analysis: For construct validity, we calculated Spearman's correlation coefficient using baseline scores of the PCL-6 with baseline scores for the IES-R, POMS-SF, and IWB. For internal consistency, we calculated Cronbach's alpha using the scores of each of the six items of the PCL-6 for all parent/caregiver participants at baseline. Results: Results indicate good convergent construct validity, reasonable divergent construct validity, and good internal consistency.