Liana S E Hone, Shahar Almog, Abigail P Masterson, Meredith S Berry
{"title":"在云端:参与远程研究之前和期间的酒精、大麻和共同使用。","authors":"Liana S E Hone, Shahar Almog, Abigail P Masterson, Meredith S Berry","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2427170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of crowdsourcing for addiction research has increased exponentially in recent years, but the extent to which the populations we expect results to generalize to might be engaging in substance use while participating in remote research has not been formally quantified. Understanding rates of day-of-study substance use on crowdsourcing platforms may be especially relevant given immediately recent use can alter cognitive and behavioral decision-making processes (e.g., attention, behavioral economic drug purchase tasks) that are often the focus of online substance use research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The purpose of this study is to (1) characterize rates of substance use (i.e., alcohol, cannabis, or both) among 790 Prolific workers on the day of the study, within the past three hours, and since starting the study; (2) provide sample demographic descriptive statistics, typical substance use patterns, and their associations with day-of use; and (3) evaluate whether day-of use is associated with time taken to complete the study and performance on attention checks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Day-of use was greater than 10%, primarily consisted of cannabis use, and several general use patterns were associated with day-of use (e.g., past year binge drinking was associated with day-of cannabis use). Day-of use was not associated with longer study completion times; attention check analyses were inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering these results, we provide suggestions for best practices when crowdsourcing data for addiction research and advocate for future studies that use naturalistic experiments to complement laboratory drug- and alcohol-administration studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"335-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High in the Cloud: Alcohol-, Cannabis-, and Co-Use Before and During Remote Research Participation.\",\"authors\":\"Liana S E Hone, Shahar Almog, Abigail P Masterson, Meredith S Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2024.2427170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of crowdsourcing for addiction research has increased exponentially in recent years, but the extent to which the populations we expect results to generalize to might be engaging in substance use while participating in remote research has not been formally quantified. Understanding rates of day-of-study substance use on crowdsourcing platforms may be especially relevant given immediately recent use can alter cognitive and behavioral decision-making processes (e.g., attention, behavioral economic drug purchase tasks) that are often the focus of online substance use research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The purpose of this study is to (1) characterize rates of substance use (i.e., alcohol, cannabis, or both) among 790 Prolific workers on the day of the study, within the past three hours, and since starting the study; (2) provide sample demographic descriptive statistics, typical substance use patterns, and their associations with day-of use; and (3) evaluate whether day-of use is associated with time taken to complete the study and performance on attention checks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Day-of use was greater than 10%, primarily consisted of cannabis use, and several general use patterns were associated with day-of use (e.g., past year binge drinking was associated with day-of cannabis use). Day-of use was not associated with longer study completion times; attention check analyses were inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering these results, we provide suggestions for best practices when crowdsourcing data for addiction research and advocate for future studies that use naturalistic experiments to complement laboratory drug- and alcohol-administration studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"335-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2427170\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2427170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
High in the Cloud: Alcohol-, Cannabis-, and Co-Use Before and During Remote Research Participation.
Objective: The use of crowdsourcing for addiction research has increased exponentially in recent years, but the extent to which the populations we expect results to generalize to might be engaging in substance use while participating in remote research has not been formally quantified. Understanding rates of day-of-study substance use on crowdsourcing platforms may be especially relevant given immediately recent use can alter cognitive and behavioral decision-making processes (e.g., attention, behavioral economic drug purchase tasks) that are often the focus of online substance use research.
Method: The purpose of this study is to (1) characterize rates of substance use (i.e., alcohol, cannabis, or both) among 790 Prolific workers on the day of the study, within the past three hours, and since starting the study; (2) provide sample demographic descriptive statistics, typical substance use patterns, and their associations with day-of use; and (3) evaluate whether day-of use is associated with time taken to complete the study and performance on attention checks.
Results: Day-of use was greater than 10%, primarily consisted of cannabis use, and several general use patterns were associated with day-of use (e.g., past year binge drinking was associated with day-of cannabis use). Day-of use was not associated with longer study completion times; attention check analyses were inconclusive.
Conclusion: Considering these results, we provide suggestions for best practices when crowdsourcing data for addiction research and advocate for future studies that use naturalistic experiments to complement laboratory drug- and alcohol-administration studies.
期刊介绍:
For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited.
Topics covered include:
Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases)
Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases
Social pharmacology
Meta-analyses and systematic reviews
Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings
Adolescent and student-focused research
State of the art quantitative and qualitative research
Policy analyses
Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive
Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable
Critiques and essays on unresolved issues
Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.