体重指数对下肢截肢后康复效果的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13292
Andrew Dubin, Parisa Zarreii, Sharareh Sharififar, Ryan M Nixon, Rosalynn R Z Conic, Kailash Pendem, Heather K Vincent
{"title":"体重指数对下肢截肢后康复效果的影响。","authors":"Andrew Dubin, Parisa Zarreii, Sharareh Sharififar, Ryan M Nixon, Rosalynn R Z Conic, Kailash Pendem, Heather K Vincent","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effect of obesity on physical function and clinical outcome measures in patients who received inpatient rehabilitation services for lower extremity amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on patients with lower extremity amputation (n = 951). Patients were stratified into five categories adjusted for limb loss mass across different levels of healthy body mass index (BMI), overweight, and obesity. Outcomes included the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument functional scores (GG section), discharge home, length of stay (LOS), therapy time, discharge location, medical complications and acute care readmissions. Deep learning neural networks (DLNNs) were developed to learn the relationships between adjusted BMI and discharge home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The severely obese group (BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) demonstrated 7%-13% lower toileting hygiene functional scores at discharge compared to the remaining groups (p < .001). The severely obese group also demonstrated 8%-9% lower sit-to-lying and lying-to-sitting bed mobility scores than the other groups (both p < .001). Sit-to-stand scores were 16%-21% worse and toilet transfer scores were 12%-20% worse in the BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> group than the other groups (all p < .001). Walking 50 ft with two turns was most difficult for the BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> group, with mean scores 7%-27% lower than the other BMI groups (p = .011). Wheelchair mobility scores for propelling 150 ft were worst for the severely obese group (4.9 points vs. 5.1-5.5 points for all other groups; p = .021). The LOS was longest in the BMI > 40 group and shortest in the BMI < 25 group (15.0 days vs. 13.3 days; p = .032). Logistic regression analysis indicated that BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was associated with lower odds risk (OR) of discharge-to-home (OR = 0.504 [0.281-0.904]; p < .022). DLNNs found that adjusted BMI and BMI category were ranked 11th and 12th out of 90 model variables in predicting discharge home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with severe obesity (>40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) achieved lower functional independence for several tasks and are less likely to be discharged home despite higher therapy volume than other groups. If a patient is going home, obesity will pose unique demands on the caregivers and resources can be put in place to help reintegrate the patient into life.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of body mass index on rehabilitation outcomes after lower limb amputation.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Dubin, Parisa Zarreii, Sharareh Sharififar, Ryan M Nixon, Rosalynn R Z Conic, Kailash Pendem, Heather K Vincent\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effect of obesity on physical function and clinical outcome measures in patients who received inpatient rehabilitation services for lower extremity amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on patients with lower extremity amputation (n = 951). Patients were stratified into five categories adjusted for limb loss mass across different levels of healthy body mass index (BMI), overweight, and obesity. Outcomes included the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument functional scores (GG section), discharge home, length of stay (LOS), therapy time, discharge location, medical complications and acute care readmissions. Deep learning neural networks (DLNNs) were developed to learn the relationships between adjusted BMI and discharge home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The severely obese group (BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) demonstrated 7%-13% lower toileting hygiene functional scores at discharge compared to the remaining groups (p < .001). The severely obese group also demonstrated 8%-9% lower sit-to-lying and lying-to-sitting bed mobility scores than the other groups (both p < .001). Sit-to-stand scores were 16%-21% worse and toilet transfer scores were 12%-20% worse in the BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> group than the other groups (all p < .001). Walking 50 ft with two turns was most difficult for the BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> group, with mean scores 7%-27% lower than the other BMI groups (p = .011). Wheelchair mobility scores for propelling 150 ft were worst for the severely obese group (4.9 points vs. 5.1-5.5 points for all other groups; p = .021). The LOS was longest in the BMI > 40 group and shortest in the BMI < 25 group (15.0 days vs. 13.3 days; p = .032). Logistic regression analysis indicated that BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was associated with lower odds risk (OR) of discharge-to-home (OR = 0.504 [0.281-0.904]; p < .022). DLNNs found that adjusted BMI and BMI category were ranked 11th and 12th out of 90 model variables in predicting discharge home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with severe obesity (>40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) achieved lower functional independence for several tasks and are less likely to be discharged home despite higher therapy volume than other groups. If a patient is going home, obesity will pose unique demands on the caregivers and resources can be put in place to help reintegrate the patient into life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of body mass index on rehabilitation outcomes after lower limb amputation.

Purpose: To determine the effect of obesity on physical function and clinical outcome measures in patients who received inpatient rehabilitation services for lower extremity amputation.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients with lower extremity amputation (n = 951). Patients were stratified into five categories adjusted for limb loss mass across different levels of healthy body mass index (BMI), overweight, and obesity. Outcomes included the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument functional scores (GG section), discharge home, length of stay (LOS), therapy time, discharge location, medical complications and acute care readmissions. Deep learning neural networks (DLNNs) were developed to learn the relationships between adjusted BMI and discharge home.

Results: The severely obese group (BMI > 40 kg/m2) demonstrated 7%-13% lower toileting hygiene functional scores at discharge compared to the remaining groups (p < .001). The severely obese group also demonstrated 8%-9% lower sit-to-lying and lying-to-sitting bed mobility scores than the other groups (both p < .001). Sit-to-stand scores were 16%-21% worse and toilet transfer scores were 12%-20% worse in the BMI > 40 kg/m2 group than the other groups (all p < .001). Walking 50 ft with two turns was most difficult for the BMI > 40 kg/m2 group, with mean scores 7%-27% lower than the other BMI groups (p = .011). Wheelchair mobility scores for propelling 150 ft were worst for the severely obese group (4.9 points vs. 5.1-5.5 points for all other groups; p = .021). The LOS was longest in the BMI > 40 group and shortest in the BMI < 25 group (15.0 days vs. 13.3 days; p = .032). Logistic regression analysis indicated that BMI > 40 kg/m2 was associated with lower odds risk (OR) of discharge-to-home (OR = 0.504 [0.281-0.904]; p < .022). DLNNs found that adjusted BMI and BMI category were ranked 11th and 12th out of 90 model variables in predicting discharge home.

Conclusion: Patients with severe obesity (>40 kg/m2) achieved lower functional independence for several tasks and are less likely to be discharged home despite higher therapy volume than other groups. If a patient is going home, obesity will pose unique demands on the caregivers and resources can be put in place to help reintegrate the patient into life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信