将 PROSPECT 与叶片结构的事先估计相结合,改进从双向反射因子光谱中检索银杏叶氮含量的工作。

IF 7.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Plant Phenomics Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34133/plantphenomics.0282
Kai Zhou, Saiting Qiu, Fuliang Cao, Guibin Wang, Lin Cao
{"title":"将 PROSPECT 与叶片结构的事先估计相结合,改进从双向反射因子光谱中检索银杏叶氮含量的工作。","authors":"Kai Zhou, Saiting Qiu, Fuliang Cao, Guibin Wang, Lin Cao","doi":"10.34133/plantphenomics.0282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) is a crucial indicator for assessing the nitrogen status of forest trees. The LNC retrieval can be achieved with the inversion of the PROSPECT-PRO model. However, the LNC retrieval from the commonly used leaf bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) spectra remains challenging arising from the confounding effects of mesophyll structure, specular reflection, and other chemicals such as water. To address this issue, this study proposed an advanced BRF spectra-based approach, by alleviating the specular reflection effects and enhancing the leaf nitrogen absorption signals from <i>Ginkgo</i> trees and saplings, using 3 modified ratio indices (i.e., mPrior_800, mPrior_1131, and mPrior_1365) for the prior estimation of the N<sub>struct</sub> structure parameter, combined with different inversion methods (STANDARD, sPROCOSINE, PROSDM, and PROCWT). The results demonstrated that the prior N<sub>struct</sub> estimation strategy using modified ratio indices outperformed standard ratio indices or nonperforming prior N<sub>struct</sub> estimation, especially for mPrior_1131 and mPrior_1365 yielding reliable performance for most constituents. With the use of the optimal approaches (i.e., PROCWT_S3 combined with mPrior_1131 or mPrior_1365), our results also revealed that the optimal estimation of LNC<sub>area</sub> (normalized root mean square error [NRMSE] = 12.94% to 14.49%) and LNC<sub>mass</sub> (NRMSE = 10.11% to 10.75%) can be further achieved, with the selected optimal wavebands concentrated in 5 common main domains of 1440 to 1539 nm, 1580 to 1639 nm, 1900 to 1999 nm, 2020 to 2099 nm, and 2120 to 2179 nm. These findings highlight marked potentials of the novel BRF spectra-based approach to improve the estimation of LNC and enhance the understanding of the impact of N<sub>struct</sub> prior estimation on the LNC retrieval in leaves of <i>Ginkgo</i> trees and saplings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20318,"journal":{"name":"Plant Phenomics","volume":"6 ","pages":"0282"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11641793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupling PROSPECT with Prior Estimation of Leaf Structure to Improve the Retrieval of Leaf Nitrogen Content in <i>Ginkgo</i> from Bidirectional Reflectance Factor Spectra.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Zhou, Saiting Qiu, Fuliang Cao, Guibin Wang, Lin Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.34133/plantphenomics.0282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) is a crucial indicator for assessing the nitrogen status of forest trees. The LNC retrieval can be achieved with the inversion of the PROSPECT-PRO model. However, the LNC retrieval from the commonly used leaf bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) spectra remains challenging arising from the confounding effects of mesophyll structure, specular reflection, and other chemicals such as water. To address this issue, this study proposed an advanced BRF spectra-based approach, by alleviating the specular reflection effects and enhancing the leaf nitrogen absorption signals from <i>Ginkgo</i> trees and saplings, using 3 modified ratio indices (i.e., mPrior_800, mPrior_1131, and mPrior_1365) for the prior estimation of the N<sub>struct</sub> structure parameter, combined with different inversion methods (STANDARD, sPROCOSINE, PROSDM, and PROCWT). The results demonstrated that the prior N<sub>struct</sub> estimation strategy using modified ratio indices outperformed standard ratio indices or nonperforming prior N<sub>struct</sub> estimation, especially for mPrior_1131 and mPrior_1365 yielding reliable performance for most constituents. With the use of the optimal approaches (i.e., PROCWT_S3 combined with mPrior_1131 or mPrior_1365), our results also revealed that the optimal estimation of LNC<sub>area</sub> (normalized root mean square error [NRMSE] = 12.94% to 14.49%) and LNC<sub>mass</sub> (NRMSE = 10.11% to 10.75%) can be further achieved, with the selected optimal wavebands concentrated in 5 common main domains of 1440 to 1539 nm, 1580 to 1639 nm, 1900 to 1999 nm, 2020 to 2099 nm, and 2120 to 2179 nm. These findings highlight marked potentials of the novel BRF spectra-based approach to improve the estimation of LNC and enhance the understanding of the impact of N<sub>struct</sub> prior estimation on the LNC retrieval in leaves of <i>Ginkgo</i> trees and saplings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Phenomics\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"0282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11641793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Phenomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0282\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Phenomics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0282","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叶片氮含量(LNC)是评估林木氮状况的重要指标。通过 PROSPECT-PRO 模型的反演可以实现 LNC 检索。然而,从常用的叶片双向反射系数(BRF)光谱中检索 LNC 仍然具有挑战性,因为叶肉结构、镜面反射和其他化学物质(如水)会产生混杂效应。为解决这一问题,本研究提出了一种先进的基于 BRF 光谱的方法,通过使用 3 个修正比值指数(即 mPrior_800、mPrior_1131 和 mPrior_1365)对 Nstruct 结构参数进行先验估计,并结合不同的反演方法(STANDARD、sPROCOSINE、PROSDM 和 PROCWT),减轻镜面反射效应并增强银杏树和树苗的叶片氮吸收信号。结果表明,使用修正比率指数的先验 Nstruct 估计策略优于标准比率指数或非性能先验 Nstruct 估计,尤其是 mPrior_1131 和 mPrior_1365,对大多数成分具有可靠的性能。使用最优方法(即PROCWT_S3 结合 mPrior_1131 或 mPrior_1365),我们的结果还显示,LNCarea(归一化均方根误差 [NRMSE] = 12.94% 至 14.49%)和 LNCmass(NRMSE = 10.11% 至 10.75%),所选的最佳波段集中在 1440 至 1539 nm、1580 至 1639 nm、1900 至 1999 nm、2020 至 2099 nm 和 2120 至 2179 nm 这 5 个常见主域。这些发现凸显了基于 BRF 光谱的新方法在改进 LNC 估算方面的显著潜力,并加深了人们对 Nstruct 先验估算对银杏树叶和树苗 LNC 检索影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coupling PROSPECT with Prior Estimation of Leaf Structure to Improve the Retrieval of Leaf Nitrogen Content in Ginkgo from Bidirectional Reflectance Factor Spectra.

Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) is a crucial indicator for assessing the nitrogen status of forest trees. The LNC retrieval can be achieved with the inversion of the PROSPECT-PRO model. However, the LNC retrieval from the commonly used leaf bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) spectra remains challenging arising from the confounding effects of mesophyll structure, specular reflection, and other chemicals such as water. To address this issue, this study proposed an advanced BRF spectra-based approach, by alleviating the specular reflection effects and enhancing the leaf nitrogen absorption signals from Ginkgo trees and saplings, using 3 modified ratio indices (i.e., mPrior_800, mPrior_1131, and mPrior_1365) for the prior estimation of the Nstruct structure parameter, combined with different inversion methods (STANDARD, sPROCOSINE, PROSDM, and PROCWT). The results demonstrated that the prior Nstruct estimation strategy using modified ratio indices outperformed standard ratio indices or nonperforming prior Nstruct estimation, especially for mPrior_1131 and mPrior_1365 yielding reliable performance for most constituents. With the use of the optimal approaches (i.e., PROCWT_S3 combined with mPrior_1131 or mPrior_1365), our results also revealed that the optimal estimation of LNCarea (normalized root mean square error [NRMSE] = 12.94% to 14.49%) and LNCmass (NRMSE = 10.11% to 10.75%) can be further achieved, with the selected optimal wavebands concentrated in 5 common main domains of 1440 to 1539 nm, 1580 to 1639 nm, 1900 to 1999 nm, 2020 to 2099 nm, and 2120 to 2179 nm. These findings highlight marked potentials of the novel BRF spectra-based approach to improve the estimation of LNC and enhance the understanding of the impact of Nstruct prior estimation on the LNC retrieval in leaves of Ginkgo trees and saplings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Phenomics
Plant Phenomics Multiple-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.20%
发文量
26
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Phenomics is an Open Access journal published in affiliation with the State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University (NAU) and published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Like all partners participating in the Science Partner Journal program, Plant Phenomics is editorially independent from the Science family of journals. The mission of Plant Phenomics is to publish novel research that will advance all aspects of plant phenotyping from the cell to the plant population levels using innovative combinations of sensor systems and data analytics. Plant Phenomics aims also to connect phenomics to other science domains, such as genomics, genetics, physiology, molecular biology, bioinformatics, statistics, mathematics, and computer sciences. Plant Phenomics should thus contribute to advance plant sciences and agriculture/forestry/horticulture by addressing key scientific challenges in the area of plant phenomics. The scope of the journal covers the latest technologies in plant phenotyping for data acquisition, data management, data interpretation, modeling, and their practical applications for crop cultivation, plant breeding, forestry, horticulture, ecology, and other plant-related domains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信