2011 年福岛第一核电站事故后,从紧急保护行动规划区撤离的三家医院面临的困难。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Saori Nonaka, Toyoaki Sawano, Tomoyoshi Oikawa, Michio Murakami, Akihiko Ozaki, Tianchen Zhao, Makoto Yoshida, Chika Yamamoto, Masaharu Tsubokura
{"title":"2011 年福岛第一核电站事故后,从紧急保护行动规划区撤离的三家医院面临的困难。","authors":"Saori Nonaka, Toyoaki Sawano, Tomoyoshi Oikawa, Michio Murakami, Akihiko Ozaki, Tianchen Zhao, Makoto Yoshida, Chika Yamamoto, Masaharu Tsubokura","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrae015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In radiological disasters, evacuating institutionalized individuals such as hospitalized patients and nursing home residents presents complex challenges. The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant (FDNPP) accident, triggered by the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE), exposed critical issues in evacuation planning. This case series investigates the evacuation difficulties encountered by three hospitals situated 20 to 30 km from the FDNPP following the GEJE and FDNPP accident. Data collection involved reviewing records, stakeholder interviews and analyzing publicly available resources. Six key challenges emerged: acute phase influx-hospitals faced an abrupt surge in patients, including trauma victims and vulnerable individuals; initial discharge and transfers-coordinating patient discharges and transfers during the chaotic aftermath proved daunting; staff shortages-evacuation and personal factors lead to reduced staffing levels and strained hospital capabilities; infrastructure damage and logistics suspension-infrastructure issues, such as burst water pipes, halted gas supplies, and heavy oil shortage disrupted hospital operations; unclear evacuation criteria-ad hoc evacuation decisions underscored the lack of clear criteria; and limited preparation time-minimal preparation time hindered communication and planning. These findings underscore the need for robust disaster planning, resource management, and communication strategies to ensure the safety of patients and staff during radiological emergencies. Government interventions, early patient discharge, and improved medical record communication may alleviate the burden of evacuation. The lessons learned emphasize the importance of maintaining hospital functions in disaster-prone areas, particularly for vulnerable populations, and highlight the necessity for comprehensive community-wide disaster prevention planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":"65 Supplement_1","pages":"i67-i79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficulties faced by three hospitals evacuated from the urgent protective action planning zone after the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant accident.\",\"authors\":\"Saori Nonaka, Toyoaki Sawano, Tomoyoshi Oikawa, Michio Murakami, Akihiko Ozaki, Tianchen Zhao, Makoto Yoshida, Chika Yamamoto, Masaharu Tsubokura\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrr/rrae015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In radiological disasters, evacuating institutionalized individuals such as hospitalized patients and nursing home residents presents complex challenges. The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant (FDNPP) accident, triggered by the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE), exposed critical issues in evacuation planning. This case series investigates the evacuation difficulties encountered by three hospitals situated 20 to 30 km from the FDNPP following the GEJE and FDNPP accident. Data collection involved reviewing records, stakeholder interviews and analyzing publicly available resources. Six key challenges emerged: acute phase influx-hospitals faced an abrupt surge in patients, including trauma victims and vulnerable individuals; initial discharge and transfers-coordinating patient discharges and transfers during the chaotic aftermath proved daunting; staff shortages-evacuation and personal factors lead to reduced staffing levels and strained hospital capabilities; infrastructure damage and logistics suspension-infrastructure issues, such as burst water pipes, halted gas supplies, and heavy oil shortage disrupted hospital operations; unclear evacuation criteria-ad hoc evacuation decisions underscored the lack of clear criteria; and limited preparation time-minimal preparation time hindered communication and planning. These findings underscore the need for robust disaster planning, resource management, and communication strategies to ensure the safety of patients and staff during radiological emergencies. Government interventions, early patient discharge, and improved medical record communication may alleviate the burden of evacuation. The lessons learned emphasize the importance of maintaining hospital functions in disaster-prone areas, particularly for vulnerable populations, and highlight the necessity for comprehensive community-wide disaster prevention planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"volume\":\"65 Supplement_1\",\"pages\":\"i67-i79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647931/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrae015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrae015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在放射性灾难中,疏散住院病人和疗养院居民等机构人员面临着复杂的挑战。由东日本大地震(GEJE)引发的福岛第一核电站(FDNPP)事故暴露了疏散计划中的关键问题。本系列案例调查了距离 FDNPP 20 至 30 公里的三家医院在 GEJE 和 FDNPP 事故后遇到的疏散困难。数据收集包括审查记录、利益相关者访谈和分析可公开获得的资源。结果发现了六大挑战:急性期病人大量涌入--医院面临着突然激增的病人,包括外伤患者和弱势群体;初始出院和转院--事实证明,在混乱的善后工作中协调病人出院和转院是一项艰巨的任务;人员短缺--撤离和个人因素导致人员减少,医院能力紧张;基础设施损坏和后勤中断--水管爆裂、天然气供应中断和石油严重短缺等基础设施问题扰乱了医院的运作;疏散标准不明确--临时疏散决定凸显了缺乏明确标准的问题;准备时间有限--准备时间极短阻碍了沟通和规划。这些发现突出表明,有必要制定强有力的灾难规划、资源管理和沟通策略,以确保放射紧急情况下患者和工作人员的安全。政府干预、尽早让病人出院以及改善病历沟通可减轻撤离的负担。这些经验教训强调了在灾害易发地区保持医院功能的重要性,特别是对弱势群体而言,并突出了在整个社区范围内进行全面防灾规划的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difficulties faced by three hospitals evacuated from the urgent protective action planning zone after the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant accident.

In radiological disasters, evacuating institutionalized individuals such as hospitalized patients and nursing home residents presents complex challenges. The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant (FDNPP) accident, triggered by the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE), exposed critical issues in evacuation planning. This case series investigates the evacuation difficulties encountered by three hospitals situated 20 to 30 km from the FDNPP following the GEJE and FDNPP accident. Data collection involved reviewing records, stakeholder interviews and analyzing publicly available resources. Six key challenges emerged: acute phase influx-hospitals faced an abrupt surge in patients, including trauma victims and vulnerable individuals; initial discharge and transfers-coordinating patient discharges and transfers during the chaotic aftermath proved daunting; staff shortages-evacuation and personal factors lead to reduced staffing levels and strained hospital capabilities; infrastructure damage and logistics suspension-infrastructure issues, such as burst water pipes, halted gas supplies, and heavy oil shortage disrupted hospital operations; unclear evacuation criteria-ad hoc evacuation decisions underscored the lack of clear criteria; and limited preparation time-minimal preparation time hindered communication and planning. These findings underscore the need for robust disaster planning, resource management, and communication strategies to ensure the safety of patients and staff during radiological emergencies. Government interventions, early patient discharge, and improved medical record communication may alleviate the burden of evacuation. The lessons learned emphasize the importance of maintaining hospital functions in disaster-prone areas, particularly for vulnerable populations, and highlight the necessity for comprehensive community-wide disaster prevention planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信