Ali Eltareb, Bibi A Khan, Gustavo E Lopez, Nicolas Giovambattista
{"title":"压力下玻璃水的核量子效应:玻璃化和压力诱导的转化。","authors":"Ali Eltareb, Bibi A Khan, Gustavo E Lopez, Nicolas Giovambattista","doi":"10.1063/5.0238823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We perform classical molecular dynamics (MD) and path-integral MD (PIMD) simulations of H2O and D2O using the q-TIP4P/F model over a wide range of temperatures and pressures to study the nuclear quantum effects (NQEs) on (i) the vitrification of liquid water upon isobaric cooling at different pressures and (ii) pressure-induced transformations at constant temperature between low-density amorphous and high-density amorphous ice (LDA and HDA) and hexagonal ice Ih and HDA. Upon isobaric cooling, classical and quantum H2O and D2O vitrify into a continuum of intermediate amorphous ices (IA), with densities in-between those of LDA and HDA (depending on pressure). Importantly, the density of the IA varies considerably if NQEs are included (similar conclusions hold for ice Ih at all pressures studied). While the structure of the IA is not very sensitive to NQE, the geometry of the hydrogen-bond (HB) is. NQE leads to longer and less linear HB in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih than found in the classical case. Interestingly, the delocalization of the H/D atoms is non-negligible and identical in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih at all pressures studied. Our isothermal compression/decompression MD/PIMD simulations show that classical and quantum H2O and D2O all exhibit LDA-HDA and ice Ih-HDA transformations, consistent with experiments. The inclusion of NQE leads to a softer HB-network, which lowers slightly the LDA/ice Ih-to-HDA transformation pressures. Interestingly, the HB in HDA is longer and less linear than in LDA, which is counterintuitive given that HDA is ≈25% denser than LDA. Overall, our results show that, while classical computer simulations provide the correct qualitative phenomenology of ice and glassy water, NQEs are necessary for a quantitative description.</p>","PeriodicalId":15313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":"161 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nuclear quantum effects on glassy water under pressure: Vitrification and pressure-induced transformations.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Eltareb, Bibi A Khan, Gustavo E Lopez, Nicolas Giovambattista\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0238823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We perform classical molecular dynamics (MD) and path-integral MD (PIMD) simulations of H2O and D2O using the q-TIP4P/F model over a wide range of temperatures and pressures to study the nuclear quantum effects (NQEs) on (i) the vitrification of liquid water upon isobaric cooling at different pressures and (ii) pressure-induced transformations at constant temperature between low-density amorphous and high-density amorphous ice (LDA and HDA) and hexagonal ice Ih and HDA. Upon isobaric cooling, classical and quantum H2O and D2O vitrify into a continuum of intermediate amorphous ices (IA), with densities in-between those of LDA and HDA (depending on pressure). Importantly, the density of the IA varies considerably if NQEs are included (similar conclusions hold for ice Ih at all pressures studied). While the structure of the IA is not very sensitive to NQE, the geometry of the hydrogen-bond (HB) is. NQE leads to longer and less linear HB in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih than found in the classical case. Interestingly, the delocalization of the H/D atoms is non-negligible and identical in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih at all pressures studied. Our isothermal compression/decompression MD/PIMD simulations show that classical and quantum H2O and D2O all exhibit LDA-HDA and ice Ih-HDA transformations, consistent with experiments. The inclusion of NQE leads to a softer HB-network, which lowers slightly the LDA/ice Ih-to-HDA transformation pressures. Interestingly, the HB in HDA is longer and less linear than in LDA, which is counterintuitive given that HDA is ≈25% denser than LDA. Overall, our results show that, while classical computer simulations provide the correct qualitative phenomenology of ice and glassy water, NQEs are necessary for a quantitative description.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":\"161 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0238823\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0238823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们使用q-TIP4P/F模型在大范围温度和压力下对H2O和D2O进行了经典分子动力学(MD)和路径积分MD (PIMD)模拟,以研究核量子效应(NQEs)对(i)在不同压力下等压冷却时液态水的玻璃化以及(ii)在低密度非晶冰和高密度非晶冰(LDA和HDA)和六方冰(Ih和HDA)之间的恒温压力诱导转化。在等压冷却后,经典和量子H2O和D2O玻璃化成中间无定形冰(IA)的连续体,密度介于LDA和HDA之间(取决于压力)。重要的是,如果包括NQEs, IA的密度会有很大的变化(在所有研究压力下的冰都有类似的结论)。虽然IA的结构对NQE不是很敏感,但氢键(HB)的几何形状对NQE很敏感。与经典病例相比,NQE导致LDA、HDA和ice Ih的HB更长,线性程度更低。有趣的是,在LDA, HDA和ice Ih中,H/D原子的离域是不可忽略的,并且在所有研究压力下都是相同的。我们的等温压缩/解压MD/PIMD模拟表明,经典和量子H2O和D2O都表现出LDA-HDA和冰Ih-HDA转变,与实验一致。NQE的加入导致了一个更软的hb -网络,这略微降低了LDA/ice i -to- hda的转换压力。有趣的是,HDA的HB比LDA更长,线性度更低,这与直觉相反,因为HDA的密度比LDA大约25%。总的来说,我们的结果表明,虽然经典的计算机模拟提供了正确的冰和玻璃水的定性现象学,但NQEs对于定量描述是必要的。
Nuclear quantum effects on glassy water under pressure: Vitrification and pressure-induced transformations.
We perform classical molecular dynamics (MD) and path-integral MD (PIMD) simulations of H2O and D2O using the q-TIP4P/F model over a wide range of temperatures and pressures to study the nuclear quantum effects (NQEs) on (i) the vitrification of liquid water upon isobaric cooling at different pressures and (ii) pressure-induced transformations at constant temperature between low-density amorphous and high-density amorphous ice (LDA and HDA) and hexagonal ice Ih and HDA. Upon isobaric cooling, classical and quantum H2O and D2O vitrify into a continuum of intermediate amorphous ices (IA), with densities in-between those of LDA and HDA (depending on pressure). Importantly, the density of the IA varies considerably if NQEs are included (similar conclusions hold for ice Ih at all pressures studied). While the structure of the IA is not very sensitive to NQE, the geometry of the hydrogen-bond (HB) is. NQE leads to longer and less linear HB in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih than found in the classical case. Interestingly, the delocalization of the H/D atoms is non-negligible and identical in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih at all pressures studied. Our isothermal compression/decompression MD/PIMD simulations show that classical and quantum H2O and D2O all exhibit LDA-HDA and ice Ih-HDA transformations, consistent with experiments. The inclusion of NQE leads to a softer HB-network, which lowers slightly the LDA/ice Ih-to-HDA transformation pressures. Interestingly, the HB in HDA is longer and less linear than in LDA, which is counterintuitive given that HDA is ≈25% denser than LDA. Overall, our results show that, while classical computer simulations provide the correct qualitative phenomenology of ice and glassy water, NQEs are necessary for a quantitative description.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Physics publishes quantitative and rigorous science of long-lasting value in methods and applications of chemical physics. The Journal also publishes brief Communications of significant new findings, Perspectives on the latest advances in the field, and Special Topic issues. The Journal focuses on innovative research in experimental and theoretical areas of chemical physics, including spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics. In addition, topical areas such as polymers, soft matter, materials, surfaces/interfaces, and systems of biological relevance are of increasing importance.
Topical coverage includes:
Theoretical Methods and Algorithms
Advanced Experimental Techniques
Atoms, Molecules, and Clusters
Liquids, Glasses, and Crystals
Surfaces, Interfaces, and Materials
Polymers and Soft Matter
Biological Molecules and Networks.