分娩方式和麻醉方法对新生儿听力筛查 ABR 结果的影响。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Semih Guler, Ayse Sanem Sahli, Murat Dogan
{"title":"分娩方式和麻醉方法对新生儿听力筛查 ABR 结果的影响。","authors":"Semih Guler, Ayse Sanem Sahli, Murat Dogan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to examine the effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method on the screening ABR test results of newborns within the scope of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program (NHCP) and to investigate the relationship between the test results and the relevant variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>441 newborns were included in the study. Of these newborns, 221 constituted the control group (normal (vaginal) delivery), and 220 constituted the study group (cesarean section, delivery). In the study, all newborns whose hearing was evaluated within the scope of the Newborn Screening Program were screened twice. Screening ABR test results applied were compared considering the type of delivery (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general). The effects of variables such as the duration of the baby's separation (dissection) from the mother's womb, the duration of exposure to the anesthetic agent and the total duration of the surgical procedure were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the study, a statistically significant relationship was found between delivery type (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general) and first screening ABR test results (p < 0.001). While there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of separation time from the mother's womb (p < 0.001) and exposure to an anesthetic agent among the first test screening ABR results of newborns born under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of total surgical procedure time (p = 0.106) no difference was detected. There was no statistically significant difference between ABR test results and these three variables in newborns born under spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The type of delivery newborns and the anesthesia method used at delivery may affect the results of screening ABR applied within the scope of a newborn hearing screening protocol. For this reason, it is very important to perform screening tests at the most appropriate and correct time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"188 ","pages":"112185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method to ABR results on newborn hearing screening.\",\"authors\":\"Semih Guler, Ayse Sanem Sahli, Murat Dogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to examine the effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method on the screening ABR test results of newborns within the scope of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program (NHCP) and to investigate the relationship between the test results and the relevant variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>441 newborns were included in the study. Of these newborns, 221 constituted the control group (normal (vaginal) delivery), and 220 constituted the study group (cesarean section, delivery). In the study, all newborns whose hearing was evaluated within the scope of the Newborn Screening Program were screened twice. Screening ABR test results applied were compared considering the type of delivery (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general). The effects of variables such as the duration of the baby's separation (dissection) from the mother's womb, the duration of exposure to the anesthetic agent and the total duration of the surgical procedure were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the study, a statistically significant relationship was found between delivery type (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general) and first screening ABR test results (p < 0.001). While there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of separation time from the mother's womb (p < 0.001) and exposure to an anesthetic agent among the first test screening ABR results of newborns born under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of total surgical procedure time (p = 0.106) no difference was detected. There was no statistically significant difference between ABR test results and these three variables in newborns born under spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The type of delivery newborns and the anesthesia method used at delivery may affect the results of screening ABR applied within the scope of a newborn hearing screening protocol. For this reason, it is very important to perform screening tests at the most appropriate and correct time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"112185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method to ABR results on newborn hearing screening.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method on the screening ABR test results of newborns within the scope of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program (NHCP) and to investigate the relationship between the test results and the relevant variables.

Methods: 441 newborns were included in the study. Of these newborns, 221 constituted the control group (normal (vaginal) delivery), and 220 constituted the study group (cesarean section, delivery). In the study, all newborns whose hearing was evaluated within the scope of the Newborn Screening Program were screened twice. Screening ABR test results applied were compared considering the type of delivery (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general). The effects of variables such as the duration of the baby's separation (dissection) from the mother's womb, the duration of exposure to the anesthetic agent and the total duration of the surgical procedure were examined.

Results: As a result of the study, a statistically significant relationship was found between delivery type (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general) and first screening ABR test results (p < 0.001). While there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of separation time from the mother's womb (p < 0.001) and exposure to an anesthetic agent among the first test screening ABR results of newborns born under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of total surgical procedure time (p = 0.106) no difference was detected. There was no statistically significant difference between ABR test results and these three variables in newborns born under spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The type of delivery newborns and the anesthesia method used at delivery may affect the results of screening ABR applied within the scope of a newborn hearing screening protocol. For this reason, it is very important to perform screening tests at the most appropriate and correct time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信