用于评估人工耳蜗植入者听力感知的连接可靠性。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Davide Brotto, Dolores Catelan, Margherita Pegolo, Gino Marioni, Nicole Galoforo, Flavia Sorrentino, Annibale Biggeri, Elisa Lovato, Cosimo De Filippis, Patrizia Trevisi
{"title":"用于评估人工耳蜗植入者听力感知的连接可靠性。","authors":"Davide Brotto, Dolores Catelan, Margherita Pegolo, Gino Marioni, Nicole Galoforo, Flavia Sorrentino, Annibale Biggeri, Elisa Lovato, Cosimo De Filippis, Patrizia Trevisi","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2433076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The cochlear implant (CI) is the gold standard treatment for profound hearing loss with insufficient hearing aid benefit. Using regular words and sentences as verbal stimuli showed a ceiling effect in patients with optimal perceptual abilities. The objectives of the study were: (1) to evaluate the reliability of auditory perception through connectivity, comparing it to the regular audiometry in soundbooth and (2) to analyse the use of logatomes to better assess the perceptual abilities of high-performing patients.</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>Cross sectional analytic study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>A total of 32 CI patients with high auditory performances underwent pure-tone and speech audiometry in two methods: (1) in an audiometric booth and (2) via direct streaming to the processor using a connectivity system. Correlation and concordance analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pure-tone audiometry showed a low correlation between the two methods. Speech audiometry revealed a high correlation at 30 dB HL but a low concordance between the two instruments. The evaluation through connectivity showed better results in pure-tone and speech audiometry than those of regular audiometry in soundbooth. The use of logatomes was useful for discriminating patients with better performances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Connectivity might be considered a useful additional method to assess the performance of CI recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of connectivity for the assessment of hearing perception in cochlear implant recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Brotto, Dolores Catelan, Margherita Pegolo, Gino Marioni, Nicole Galoforo, Flavia Sorrentino, Annibale Biggeri, Elisa Lovato, Cosimo De Filippis, Patrizia Trevisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2433076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The cochlear implant (CI) is the gold standard treatment for profound hearing loss with insufficient hearing aid benefit. Using regular words and sentences as verbal stimuli showed a ceiling effect in patients with optimal perceptual abilities. The objectives of the study were: (1) to evaluate the reliability of auditory perception through connectivity, comparing it to the regular audiometry in soundbooth and (2) to analyse the use of logatomes to better assess the perceptual abilities of high-performing patients.</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>Cross sectional analytic study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>A total of 32 CI patients with high auditory performances underwent pure-tone and speech audiometry in two methods: (1) in an audiometric booth and (2) via direct streaming to the processor using a connectivity system. Correlation and concordance analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pure-tone audiometry showed a low correlation between the two methods. Speech audiometry revealed a high correlation at 30 dB HL but a low concordance between the two instruments. The evaluation through connectivity showed better results in pure-tone and speech audiometry than those of regular audiometry in soundbooth. The use of logatomes was useful for discriminating patients with better performances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Connectivity might be considered a useful additional method to assess the performance of CI recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2433076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2433076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工耳蜗(CI)是治疗助听器效果不佳的深度听力损失的金标准疗法。使用常规单词和句子作为言语刺激,对具有最佳感知能力的患者会产生天花板效应。本研究的目的是(1)通过连通性评估听觉感知的可靠性,并将其与在声箱中进行的常规测听进行比较;(2)分析如何使用对数仪更好地评估表现优异的患者的感知能力:横断面分析研究:研究样本:共有 32 名听力表现优异的 CI 患者接受了两种方法的纯音和言语测听:(1) 在测听室中进行;(2) 通过连接系统将数据流直接传输到处理器。进行了相关性和一致性分析:结果:纯音测听显示两种方法之间的相关性较低。语音测听在 30 dB HL 时显示出较高的相关性,但两种仪器之间的一致性较低。通过连通性进行的评估显示,纯音测听和言语测听的结果优于声箱常规测听的结果。使用对数仪有助于区分表现较好的患者:连通性可被视为评估人工晶体植入者听力表现的一种有用的补充方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of connectivity for the assessment of hearing perception in cochlear implant recipients.

Objective: The cochlear implant (CI) is the gold standard treatment for profound hearing loss with insufficient hearing aid benefit. Using regular words and sentences as verbal stimuli showed a ceiling effect in patients with optimal perceptual abilities. The objectives of the study were: (1) to evaluate the reliability of auditory perception through connectivity, comparing it to the regular audiometry in soundbooth and (2) to analyse the use of logatomes to better assess the perceptual abilities of high-performing patients.

Design and study sample: Cross sectional analytic study.

Study sample: A total of 32 CI patients with high auditory performances underwent pure-tone and speech audiometry in two methods: (1) in an audiometric booth and (2) via direct streaming to the processor using a connectivity system. Correlation and concordance analyses were performed.

Results: Pure-tone audiometry showed a low correlation between the two methods. Speech audiometry revealed a high correlation at 30 dB HL but a low concordance between the two instruments. The evaluation through connectivity showed better results in pure-tone and speech audiometry than those of regular audiometry in soundbooth. The use of logatomes was useful for discriminating patients with better performances.

Conclusions: Connectivity might be considered a useful additional method to assess the performance of CI recipients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信