IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329241306392
Xiaoyu Tu, Xiaoquan Ding, Wanru Huang, Xiangrong Xu, Paulo Moreira, Runju Zhang
{"title":"Impact of Educational Background on the Quality of Standardized Residency Training Program: The Case of China, a Cohort Study.","authors":"Xiaoyu Tu, Xiaoquan Ding, Wanru Huang, Xiangrong Xu, Paulo Moreira, Runju Zhang","doi":"10.1177/11786329241306392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Residency training is important worldwide and recent studies have put more emphasis on its quality evaluation. This study aims to first explore the impact of educational backgrounds on the quality of gynecology and obstetrics (OB-GYN) standardized resident training (SRT) program in China, which may provide crucial evidence for policy considerations to improve SRT quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 397 OB-GYN resident graduates were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. They were divided into three groups according to their educational background, that is Bachelor of Medicine (BM), Master of Medicine (MM), and Doctor of Medicine (DM) groups. The characteristics and the results of SRT graduation examination and annual assessment of these residents were collected and compared using one-way analysis of variance or Pearson's chi-square test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between sociodemographic variables and pass rates of SRT graduation examination. Besides, a subgroup analysis on training time for the DM group was performed. Strobe protocol was followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The residents were older in DM group than that in BM and MM groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was significant difference of the training length and the proportion taking part in SRT graduation examination among three groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although the written test scores of SRT graduation examination were the lowest in BM group (<i>P</i> = 0.015), there was no significant difference in other results among three groups. No significant variable was found associated with the pass rates of SRT examination. No significant difference was found in the subgroup analysis of DM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the SRT quality of OB-GYN residents with different educational backgrounds was good and comparable. However, residents with BM degrees had lowest written scores and need to be strengthened during training. The training time of residents with DM degrees can be shortened according to their own conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"17 ","pages":"11786329241306392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241306392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:住院医师培训在全球范围内都非常重要,近年来的研究更加重视其质量评估。本研究旨在首次探讨教育背景对中国妇产科住院医师规范化培训(SRT)项目质量的影响,从而为提高住院医师规范化培训质量的政策考量提供重要依据:这项回顾性队列研究共纳入了 397 名妇产科住院医师毕业生。根据教育背景将他们分为三组,即医学学士(BM)组、医学硕士(MM)组和医学博士(DM)组。研究收集了这些住院医师的特征、SRT毕业考试和年度评估结果,并通过单因素方差分析或皮尔逊卡方检验进行比较。通过多变量逻辑回归分析,确定了社会人口学变量与 SRT 毕业考试通过率之间的关系。此外,还对 DM 组的训练时间进行了分组分析。结果显示结果:DM组住院医师的年龄大于BM组和MM组(P P = 0.015),三组住院医师的其他结果无显著差异。没有发现与 SRT 考试通过率相关的重要变量。在 DM 组的亚组分析中未发现明显差异:总体而言,不同教育背景的妇产科住院医师的 SRT 质量良好,具有可比性。结论:总体而言,不同教育背景的妇产科住院医师的 SRT 质量良好,具有可比性,但 BM 学历住院医师的书面评分最低,需要在培训期间加强。DM学历住院医师可根据自身情况缩短培训时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Educational Background on the Quality of Standardized Residency Training Program: The Case of China, a Cohort Study.

Objectives: Residency training is important worldwide and recent studies have put more emphasis on its quality evaluation. This study aims to first explore the impact of educational backgrounds on the quality of gynecology and obstetrics (OB-GYN) standardized resident training (SRT) program in China, which may provide crucial evidence for policy considerations to improve SRT quality.

Methods: A total of 397 OB-GYN resident graduates were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. They were divided into three groups according to their educational background, that is Bachelor of Medicine (BM), Master of Medicine (MM), and Doctor of Medicine (DM) groups. The characteristics and the results of SRT graduation examination and annual assessment of these residents were collected and compared using one-way analysis of variance or Pearson's chi-square test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between sociodemographic variables and pass rates of SRT graduation examination. Besides, a subgroup analysis on training time for the DM group was performed. Strobe protocol was followed.

Results: The residents were older in DM group than that in BM and MM groups (P < 0.001). There was significant difference of the training length and the proportion taking part in SRT graduation examination among three groups (P < 0.001). Although the written test scores of SRT graduation examination were the lowest in BM group (P = 0.015), there was no significant difference in other results among three groups. No significant variable was found associated with the pass rates of SRT examination. No significant difference was found in the subgroup analysis of DM group.

Conclusion: Overall, the SRT quality of OB-GYN residents with different educational backgrounds was good and comparable. However, residents with BM degrees had lowest written scores and need to be strengthened during training. The training time of residents with DM degrees can be shortened according to their own conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信