不同受孕方法的兄弟姐妹的围产期结果:用自体卵细胞或捐赠卵子体外受精与非辅助医疗受孕。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hila Shalev-Ram, Anat Hershko Klement, Einat Haikin-Herzberger, Mattan Levi, Roni Rahav-Koren, Amir Wiser, Netanella Miller
{"title":"不同受孕方法的兄弟姐妹的围产期结果:用自体卵细胞或捐赠卵子体外受精与非辅助医疗受孕。","authors":"Hila Shalev-Ram, Anat Hershko Klement, Einat Haikin-Herzberger, Mattan Levi, Roni Rahav-Koren, Amir Wiser, Netanella Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the perinatal outcomes of children born from different conception methods: in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous oocytes or IVF with donor egg versus those conceived without medical assistance by using a sibling analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study conducted using electronic medical record data from 2000 through 2018, of a national healthcare organization.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The cohort included mothers who had two pregnancies and their children. Cohort A compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted first conception followed by an IVF conception. Cohort B compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted conception followed by a second pregnancy from oocyte donation.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal outcomes, including small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth (PTB) <37weeks were investigated. Secondary outcomes included low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), and large for gestational age (LGA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohort A comprised women who had 2 medically unassisted pregnancies and those with 1 medically unassisted pregnancy followed by IVF (n=1080 in each). Gestational age at delivery for the second conception was significantly lower in the unassisted + IVF group compared to the medically unassisted group (38.1 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 39.1 ± 1.4 weeks, p=0.001). The unassisted + IVF group had higher rates of prematurity <37 weeks (12% vs. 3.5%, p=0.001) and SGA compared to the medically unassisted group (5.4% vs. 3.4%, p=0.048). The adjusted OR (aOR) for PTB was 3.32 (95% CI, 2.11 to 5.29) and for SGA aOR 1.88 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.32.) Cohort B included 94 women in each group. No differences were found between the medically unassisted and medically unassisted + donor egg groups regarding PTB <37 weeks (p=0.52) and SGA (p=0.32). The rate of LGA was higher in the egg donation group (24% vs. 16.5%, p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This sibling analysis suggests that IVF pregnancies with autologous eggs are more susceptible to PTB, LBW, VLBW, and SGA, while donor egg pregnancies appear relatively unaffected, except for higher rate of LGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal Outcomes in Siblings from Different Conception Methods: In Vitro Fertilization with Autologous Oocyte or Donor Egg vs. Unassisted Medical Conception.\",\"authors\":\"Hila Shalev-Ram, Anat Hershko Klement, Einat Haikin-Herzberger, Mattan Levi, Roni Rahav-Koren, Amir Wiser, Netanella Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the perinatal outcomes of children born from different conception methods: in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous oocytes or IVF with donor egg versus those conceived without medical assistance by using a sibling analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study conducted using electronic medical record data from 2000 through 2018, of a national healthcare organization.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The cohort included mothers who had two pregnancies and their children. Cohort A compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted first conception followed by an IVF conception. Cohort B compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted conception followed by a second pregnancy from oocyte donation.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal outcomes, including small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth (PTB) <37weeks were investigated. Secondary outcomes included low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), and large for gestational age (LGA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohort A comprised women who had 2 medically unassisted pregnancies and those with 1 medically unassisted pregnancy followed by IVF (n=1080 in each). Gestational age at delivery for the second conception was significantly lower in the unassisted + IVF group compared to the medically unassisted group (38.1 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 39.1 ± 1.4 weeks, p=0.001). The unassisted + IVF group had higher rates of prematurity <37 weeks (12% vs. 3.5%, p=0.001) and SGA compared to the medically unassisted group (5.4% vs. 3.4%, p=0.048). The adjusted OR (aOR) for PTB was 3.32 (95% CI, 2.11 to 5.29) and for SGA aOR 1.88 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.32.) Cohort B included 94 women in each group. No differences were found between the medically unassisted and medically unassisted + donor egg groups regarding PTB <37 weeks (p=0.52) and SGA (p=0.32). The rate of LGA was higher in the egg donation group (24% vs. 16.5%, p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This sibling analysis suggests that IVF pregnancies with autologous eggs are more susceptible to PTB, LBW, VLBW, and SGA, while donor egg pregnancies appear relatively unaffected, except for higher rate of LGA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perinatal Outcomes in Siblings from Different Conception Methods: In Vitro Fertilization with Autologous Oocyte or Donor Egg vs. Unassisted Medical Conception.

Objective: To study the perinatal outcomes of children born from different conception methods: in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous oocytes or IVF with donor egg versus those conceived without medical assistance by using a sibling analysis.

Design: Retrospective cohort study conducted using electronic medical record data from 2000 through 2018, of a national healthcare organization.

Subjects: The cohort included mothers who had two pregnancies and their children. Cohort A compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted first conception followed by an IVF conception. Cohort B compared women with two medically unassisted conceptions with those with an unassisted conception followed by a second pregnancy from oocyte donation.

Exposure: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal outcomes, including small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth (PTB) <37weeks were investigated. Secondary outcomes included low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), and large for gestational age (LGA).

Results: Cohort A comprised women who had 2 medically unassisted pregnancies and those with 1 medically unassisted pregnancy followed by IVF (n=1080 in each). Gestational age at delivery for the second conception was significantly lower in the unassisted + IVF group compared to the medically unassisted group (38.1 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 39.1 ± 1.4 weeks, p=0.001). The unassisted + IVF group had higher rates of prematurity <37 weeks (12% vs. 3.5%, p=0.001) and SGA compared to the medically unassisted group (5.4% vs. 3.4%, p=0.048). The adjusted OR (aOR) for PTB was 3.32 (95% CI, 2.11 to 5.29) and for SGA aOR 1.88 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.32.) Cohort B included 94 women in each group. No differences were found between the medically unassisted and medically unassisted + donor egg groups regarding PTB <37 weeks (p=0.52) and SGA (p=0.32). The rate of LGA was higher in the egg donation group (24% vs. 16.5%, p=0.02).

Conclusions: This sibling analysis suggests that IVF pregnancies with autologous eggs are more susceptible to PTB, LBW, VLBW, and SGA, while donor egg pregnancies appear relatively unaffected, except for higher rate of LGA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信