每日给药免疫治疗对转移性肾细胞癌存活的影响:MOUSEION-09荟萃分析

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Alessandro Rizzo, Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro, Veronica Mollica, Andrey Soares, Oronzo Brunetti, Angela Dalia Ricci, Francesco Massari, Matteo Santoni
{"title":"每日给药免疫治疗对转移性肾细胞癌存活的影响:MOUSEION-09荟萃分析","authors":"Alessandro Rizzo, Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro, Veronica Mollica, Andrey Soares, Oronzo Brunetti, Angela Dalia Ricci, Francesco Massari, Matteo Santoni","doi":"10.1007/s10585-024-10322-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies conducted in the last few years have suggested a connection between clinical outcomes and the time of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) infusion. However, few data are available regarding the differences between early and late time-of-day (ToD) administration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving immunotherapy and immune-based combinations. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to fully investigate the influence of timing of administration on the efficacy of mRCC immunotherapy, by comparing early ToD versus late ToD dosing in this setting. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Overall Survival (OS) was measured as Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our search resulted in the identification of 1429 potentially relevant reports, which were subsequently restricted to four following independent evaluation of three authors. The pooled HR for OS in RCC patients receiving early ToD versus late ToD dosing was 0.62 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.50-0.72; p < 0.001). According to our findings, a statistically significant improvement in terms of OS for mRCC patients receiving early ToD administration compared with late ToD dosing was observed, with a reduction of death by 38%. Well-designed, randomized clinical and translational trials are required to clarify this issue and to establish recommendations for personalized treatments according to ToD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":"42 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of time-of-day administration of immunotherapy on survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the MOUSEION-09 meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Rizzo, Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro, Veronica Mollica, Andrey Soares, Oronzo Brunetti, Angela Dalia Ricci, Francesco Massari, Matteo Santoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10585-024-10322-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies conducted in the last few years have suggested a connection between clinical outcomes and the time of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) infusion. However, few data are available regarding the differences between early and late time-of-day (ToD) administration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving immunotherapy and immune-based combinations. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to fully investigate the influence of timing of administration on the efficacy of mRCC immunotherapy, by comparing early ToD versus late ToD dosing in this setting. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Overall Survival (OS) was measured as Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our search resulted in the identification of 1429 potentially relevant reports, which were subsequently restricted to four following independent evaluation of three authors. The pooled HR for OS in RCC patients receiving early ToD versus late ToD dosing was 0.62 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.50-0.72; p < 0.001). According to our findings, a statistically significant improvement in terms of OS for mRCC patients receiving early ToD administration compared with late ToD dosing was observed, with a reduction of death by 38%. Well-designed, randomized clinical and translational trials are required to clarify this issue and to establish recommendations for personalized treatments according to ToD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-024-10322-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-024-10322-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几年进行的研究表明,临床结果与输注免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的时间有关。然而,有关转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者接受免疫疗法和基于免疫的联合疗法的早期和晚期给药时间(ToD)之间差异的数据却很少。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在通过比较在这种情况下的早ToD给药和晚ToD给药,全面研究给药时间对mRCC免疫疗法疗效的影响。本系统综述和荟萃分析根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis,PRISMA)进行。总生存期(OS)以危险比(HRs)和 95% 置信区间(CIs)表示。通过检索,我们发现了 1429 篇潜在的相关报告,经过三位作者的独立评估,最终只筛选出四篇报告。接受早期ToD与晚期ToD给药的RCC患者的OS汇总HR为0.62(95%置信区间,0.50-0.72;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of time-of-day administration of immunotherapy on survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the MOUSEION-09 meta-analysis.

Studies conducted in the last few years have suggested a connection between clinical outcomes and the time of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) infusion. However, few data are available regarding the differences between early and late time-of-day (ToD) administration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving immunotherapy and immune-based combinations. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to fully investigate the influence of timing of administration on the efficacy of mRCC immunotherapy, by comparing early ToD versus late ToD dosing in this setting. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Overall Survival (OS) was measured as Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our search resulted in the identification of 1429 potentially relevant reports, which were subsequently restricted to four following independent evaluation of three authors. The pooled HR for OS in RCC patients receiving early ToD versus late ToD dosing was 0.62 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.50-0.72; p < 0.001). According to our findings, a statistically significant improvement in terms of OS for mRCC patients receiving early ToD administration compared with late ToD dosing was observed, with a reduction of death by 38%. Well-designed, randomized clinical and translational trials are required to clarify this issue and to establish recommendations for personalized treatments according to ToD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信