骨骼不成熟患者的同种异体移植与自体移植前交叉韧带重建：系统性综述。

IF 6.7 2区医学 Q1 Medicine

British medical bulletin Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldae020

Filippo Migliorini, Marco Pilone, Luise Schäfer, Francesca Alzira Bertini, Riccardo Giorgino, Nicola Maffulli

{"title":"骨骼不成熟患者的同种异体移植与自体移植前交叉韧带重建：系统性综述。","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Marco Pilone, Luise Schäfer, Francesca Alzira Bertini, Riccardo Giorgino, Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldae020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in children and adolescents with open physes are common.Areas of agreement: Evidence of ACL reconstruction using allografts in children with open physes is limited.Areas of controversy: Whether the outcomes of ACL allograft reconstruction in children and adolescents with open physes are superior to autograft ACL reconstruction is unclear, with contrasting evidence.Source of data: In October 2024, the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were accessed with no additional filters. Only clinical investigations evaluating ACL reconstruction in children or adolescents with open physes were eligible. Only studies reporting a minimum length of 24 months of follow-up were included.Areas timely for developing research: Children who undergo allograft ACL reconstruction demonstrate similar functional outcomes to those who undergo autograft ACL reconstruction. Although allografts allow a faster return to sport, the greater laxity, the reduced activity level, and the higher failure and reoperation rates make their use dubious as a first-choice option for ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allograft versus autograft ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Migliorini, Marco Pilone, Luise Schäfer, Francesca Alzira Bertini, Riccardo Giorgino, Nicola Maffulli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bmb/ldae020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in children and adolescents with open physes are common.Areas of agreement: Evidence of ACL reconstruction using allografts in children with open physes is limited.Areas of controversy: Whether the outcomes of ACL allograft reconstruction in children and adolescents with open physes are superior to autograft ACL reconstruction is unclear, with contrasting evidence.Source of data: In October 2024, the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were accessed with no additional filters. Only clinical investigations evaluating ACL reconstruction in children or adolescents with open physes were eligible. Only studies reporting a minimum length of 24 months of follow-up were included.Areas timely for developing research: Children who undergo allograft ACL reconstruction demonstrate similar functional outcomes to those who undergo autograft ACL reconstruction. Although allografts allow a faster return to sport, the greater laxity, the reduced activity level, and the higher failure and reoperation rates make their use dubious as a first-choice option for ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldae020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldae020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Allograft versus autograft ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review.

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in children and adolescents with open physes are common.

Areas of agreement: Evidence of ACL reconstruction using allografts in children with open physes is limited.

Areas of controversy: Whether the outcomes of ACL allograft reconstruction in children and adolescents with open physes are superior to autograft ACL reconstruction is unclear, with contrasting evidence.

Source of data: In October 2024, the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were accessed with no additional filters. Only clinical investigations evaluating ACL reconstruction in children or adolescents with open physes were eligible. Only studies reporting a minimum length of 24 months of follow-up were included.

Areas timely for developing research: Children who undergo allograft ACL reconstruction demonstrate similar functional outcomes to those who undergo autograft ACL reconstruction. Although allografts allow a faster return to sport, the greater laxity, the reduced activity level, and the higher failure and reoperation rates make their use dubious as a first-choice option for ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

British medical bulletin 医学-医学：内科

CiteScore

13.10

自引率

1.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.