IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lixin Sun, Pan Hao, Ruchen Peng
{"title":"Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in metastatic lesions of gynecological cancers: a systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis.","authors":"Lixin Sun, Pan Hao, Ruchen Peng","doi":"10.1177/02841851241297836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>68Ga-labled fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) represents a new and exciting positron emission tomography-computed tomography/magnetic resonance (PET-CT/MR) radiotracer.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in metastatic lesions of gynecological cancers (GCs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were thoroughly investigated from inception until 22 December 2023. A head-to-head contrast between 18F-FDG PET/CT as well as 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR for the assessment of GCs was presented by the included studies. A random variable model was employed to examine the sensitivity in detection of lymph node (LN) and peritoneal metastases (PM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sensitivity for 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases (LNM) of GC were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-1) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.65-0.98), respectively, while the results about peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer were 0.98 (95% CI = 0.93-1) and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.55-0.86). Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR exhibited a better sensitivity in peritoneal involvement of ovarian cancer with a relative risk of 0.24 (95% CI = 0.09-0.40) and <i>P</i> = 0.002.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR displayed a superior sensitivity over 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic lesions of ovarian cancer. However, there was insufficient evidence to favor the superiority of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR in LNM of CC. Further studies are needed for evaluating primary and metastatic lesions of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR in different GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241297836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241297836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR和18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)PET/CT对妇科癌症(GCs)转移病灶的诊断效果:对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库从开始到2023年12月22日的数据进行了全面调查。纳入的研究对 18F-FDG PET/CT 和 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR 评估 GCs 进行了头对头对比。结果显示,68Ga-FAPI正电子发射计算机断层扫描/MR对淋巴结转移和腹膜转移的敏感性高于18F-FDG正电子发射计算机断层扫描/CT:结果:68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR和18F-FDG PET/CT对GC淋巴结转移(LNM)的汇总灵敏度分别为0.98(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.86-1)和0.85(95% CI = 0.65-0.98),而对卵巢癌腹膜转移的灵敏度分别为0.98(95% CI = 0.93-1)和0.71(95% CI = 0.55-0.86)。结论:与 18F-FDG PET/CT 相比,68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR 对卵巢癌腹膜受累的敏感性更高,相对风险为 0.24(95% CI = 0.09-0.40),P = 0.002。然而,没有足够的证据表明68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR在CC的LNM中更具优势。还需要进一步的研究来评估68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR在不同GC中的原发病灶和转移病灶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in metastatic lesions of gynecological cancers: a systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis.

Background: 68Ga-labled fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) represents a new and exciting positron emission tomography-computed tomography/magnetic resonance (PET-CT/MR) radiotracer.

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in metastatic lesions of gynecological cancers (GCs).

Material and methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were thoroughly investigated from inception until 22 December 2023. A head-to-head contrast between 18F-FDG PET/CT as well as 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR for the assessment of GCs was presented by the included studies. A random variable model was employed to examine the sensitivity in detection of lymph node (LN) and peritoneal metastases (PM).

Results: The pooled sensitivity for 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases (LNM) of GC were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-1) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.65-0.98), respectively, while the results about peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer were 0.98 (95% CI = 0.93-1) and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.55-0.86). Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR exhibited a better sensitivity in peritoneal involvement of ovarian cancer with a relative risk of 0.24 (95% CI = 0.09-0.40) and P = 0.002.

Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR displayed a superior sensitivity over 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic lesions of ovarian cancer. However, there was insufficient evidence to favor the superiority of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR in LNM of CC. Further studies are needed for evaluating primary and metastatic lesions of 68Ga-FAPI PET CT/MR in different GC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信