大型植物生命形式的Beta多样性:对亚马逊水生环境中局部、空间和土地利用变量的响应。

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178041
Francieli F Bomfim, Lucimar S Carvalho, Fabiane B Sampaio, Leandro Juen, Karina Dias-Silva, Lilian Casatti, Rayssa S Carmo, Raimundo L M Sousa, Guilherme S Cabral, Antônio A S Costa, Thaisa S Michelan
{"title":"大型植物生命形式的Beta多样性:对亚马逊水生环境中局部、空间和土地利用变量的响应。","authors":"Francieli F Bomfim, Lucimar S Carvalho, Fabiane B Sampaio, Leandro Juen, Karina Dias-Silva, Lilian Casatti, Rayssa S Carmo, Raimundo L M Sousa, Guilherme S Cabral, Antônio A S Costa, Thaisa S Michelan","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aquatic macrophytes encompass a highly diverse group of plants with different strategies, niche requirements, and dispersion capacities. Therefore, macrophyte life forms can respond distinctly to environmental factors. We analyzed whether emergent/amphibious, floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes respond differently to local, spatial, and land use variables in ponds and streams of the Amazon. We sampled macrophytes and physical and chemical variables in 158 sites in the Pará state, Brazil. Land use and land cover were obtained via satellite images. A total of 264 macrophyte taxa were recorded, including 234 amphibious/emergent, 17 floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and 13 free-floating/free-submerged. The highest total beta diversity was recorded for amphibious/emergent species (0.47), followed by free-floating and floating submerged (0.41), and floating-leaves and rooted submerged species (0.39). The replacement component explained the greatest proportion of total beta for the three macrophyte groups, with values higher than 60 %. The spatial component greatly influenced the total beta diversity of amphibious/emergent (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06) and floating-leaves/rooted submerged life forms (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.08). Meanwhile, local variables were more associated with the total beta diversity of free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06). Free-floating and free-submerged life forms were the only groups influenced by land use changes (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02), and their richness difference between sites was spatially structured (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.10). Our study is one of the first to explore the combined effects of local, spatial, and land use variables on macrophyte life forms. These results are important for deeply understanding macrophyte structure in Amazon environments, threatened by anthropic activities and planning conservation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"958 ","pages":"178041"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beta diversity of macrophyte life forms: Responses to local, spatial, and land use variables in Amazon aquatic environments.\",\"authors\":\"Francieli F Bomfim, Lucimar S Carvalho, Fabiane B Sampaio, Leandro Juen, Karina Dias-Silva, Lilian Casatti, Rayssa S Carmo, Raimundo L M Sousa, Guilherme S Cabral, Antônio A S Costa, Thaisa S Michelan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aquatic macrophytes encompass a highly diverse group of plants with different strategies, niche requirements, and dispersion capacities. Therefore, macrophyte life forms can respond distinctly to environmental factors. We analyzed whether emergent/amphibious, floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes respond differently to local, spatial, and land use variables in ponds and streams of the Amazon. We sampled macrophytes and physical and chemical variables in 158 sites in the Pará state, Brazil. Land use and land cover were obtained via satellite images. A total of 264 macrophyte taxa were recorded, including 234 amphibious/emergent, 17 floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and 13 free-floating/free-submerged. The highest total beta diversity was recorded for amphibious/emergent species (0.47), followed by free-floating and floating submerged (0.41), and floating-leaves and rooted submerged species (0.39). The replacement component explained the greatest proportion of total beta for the three macrophyte groups, with values higher than 60 %. The spatial component greatly influenced the total beta diversity of amphibious/emergent (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06) and floating-leaves/rooted submerged life forms (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.08). Meanwhile, local variables were more associated with the total beta diversity of free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06). Free-floating and free-submerged life forms were the only groups influenced by land use changes (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02), and their richness difference between sites was spatially structured (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.10). Our study is one of the first to explore the combined effects of local, spatial, and land use variables on macrophyte life forms. These results are important for deeply understanding macrophyte structure in Amazon environments, threatened by anthropic activities and planning conservation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"958 \",\"pages\":\"178041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水生大型藻类是一个高度多样化的植物群体,具有不同的策略、生态位要求和分散能力。因此,大型水生植物的生命形式会对环境因素做出不同的反应。我们分析了亚马逊地区池塘和溪流中的挺水/两栖、浮叶/扎根沉水和自由浮水/自由沉水大型水草是否对当地、空间和土地利用变量做出不同反应。我们在巴西帕拉州的 158 个地点对大型水草和物理化学变量进行了采样。通过卫星图像获得了土地利用和土地覆盖情况。共记录了 264 个大型水草类群,其中包括 234 个两栖/新生类群、17 个浮叶/有根沉水类群和 13 个自由浮水/自由沉水类群。两栖/萌发物种的总贝塔多样性最高(0.47),其次是自由漂浮和漂浮沉水物种(0.41)以及浮叶和扎根沉水物种(0.39)。替换成分对三类大型底栖生物总贝塔值的解释比例最大,其值高于 60%。空间分量对两栖/新生(R2 = 0.06)和浮叶/扎根沉水生物(R2 = 0.08)的总贝塔多样性影响很大。同时,地方变量与自由浮游/自由沉水大型植物的总贝塔多样性(R2 = 0.06)更相关。自由浮游和自由沉水生物是唯一受土地利用变化影响的生物类群(R2 = 0.02),且不同地点间的丰富度差异具有空间结构(R2 = 0.10)。我们的研究是首次探讨地方、空间和土地利用变量对大型底栖生物的综合影响的研究之一。这些结果对于深入了解受到人类活动威胁的亚马逊环境中的大型底栖生物结构以及规划保护策略具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beta diversity of macrophyte life forms: Responses to local, spatial, and land use variables in Amazon aquatic environments.

Aquatic macrophytes encompass a highly diverse group of plants with different strategies, niche requirements, and dispersion capacities. Therefore, macrophyte life forms can respond distinctly to environmental factors. We analyzed whether emergent/amphibious, floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes respond differently to local, spatial, and land use variables in ponds and streams of the Amazon. We sampled macrophytes and physical and chemical variables in 158 sites in the Pará state, Brazil. Land use and land cover were obtained via satellite images. A total of 264 macrophyte taxa were recorded, including 234 amphibious/emergent, 17 floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and 13 free-floating/free-submerged. The highest total beta diversity was recorded for amphibious/emergent species (0.47), followed by free-floating and floating submerged (0.41), and floating-leaves and rooted submerged species (0.39). The replacement component explained the greatest proportion of total beta for the three macrophyte groups, with values higher than 60 %. The spatial component greatly influenced the total beta diversity of amphibious/emergent (R2 = 0.06) and floating-leaves/rooted submerged life forms (R2 = 0.08). Meanwhile, local variables were more associated with the total beta diversity of free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes (R2 = 0.06). Free-floating and free-submerged life forms were the only groups influenced by land use changes (R2 = 0.02), and their richness difference between sites was spatially structured (R2 = 0.10). Our study is one of the first to explore the combined effects of local, spatial, and land use variables on macrophyte life forms. These results are important for deeply understanding macrophyte structure in Amazon environments, threatened by anthropic activities and planning conservation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信