Zannel Blanchard, Elisabeth A. Brown, Arevik Ghazaryan, Alana L. Welm
{"title":"用于功能性精准肿瘤学和发现科学的 PDX 模型","authors":"Zannel Blanchard, Elisabeth A. Brown, Arevik Ghazaryan, Alana L. Welm","doi":"10.1038/s41568-024-00779-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Precision oncology relies on detailed molecular analysis of how diverse tumours respond to various therapies, with the aim to optimize treatment outcomes for individual patients. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been key to preclinical validation of precision oncology approaches, enabling the analysis of each tumour’s unique genomic landscape and testing therapies that are predicted to be effective based on specific mutations, gene expression patterns or signalling abnormalities. To extend these standard precision oncology approaches, the field has strived to complement the otherwise static and often descriptive measurements with functional assays, termed functional precision oncology (FPO). By utilizing diverse PDX and PDX-derived models, FPO has gained traction as an effective preclinical and clinical tool to more precisely recapitulate patient biology using in vivo and ex vivo functional assays. Here, we explore advances and limitations of PDX and PDX-derived models for precision oncology and FPO. We also examine the future of PDX models for precision oncology in the age of artificial intelligence. Integrating these two disciplines could be the key to fast, accurate and cost-effective treatment prediction, revolutionizing oncology and providing patients with cancer with the most effective, personalized treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19055,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":72.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PDX models for functional precision oncology and discovery science\",\"authors\":\"Zannel Blanchard, Elisabeth A. Brown, Arevik Ghazaryan, Alana L. Welm\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41568-024-00779-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Precision oncology relies on detailed molecular analysis of how diverse tumours respond to various therapies, with the aim to optimize treatment outcomes for individual patients. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been key to preclinical validation of precision oncology approaches, enabling the analysis of each tumour’s unique genomic landscape and testing therapies that are predicted to be effective based on specific mutations, gene expression patterns or signalling abnormalities. To extend these standard precision oncology approaches, the field has strived to complement the otherwise static and often descriptive measurements with functional assays, termed functional precision oncology (FPO). By utilizing diverse PDX and PDX-derived models, FPO has gained traction as an effective preclinical and clinical tool to more precisely recapitulate patient biology using in vivo and ex vivo functional assays. Here, we explore advances and limitations of PDX and PDX-derived models for precision oncology and FPO. We also examine the future of PDX models for precision oncology in the age of artificial intelligence. Integrating these two disciplines could be the key to fast, accurate and cost-effective treatment prediction, revolutionizing oncology and providing patients with cancer with the most effective, personalized treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":72.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00779-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00779-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
PDX models for functional precision oncology and discovery science
Precision oncology relies on detailed molecular analysis of how diverse tumours respond to various therapies, with the aim to optimize treatment outcomes for individual patients. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been key to preclinical validation of precision oncology approaches, enabling the analysis of each tumour’s unique genomic landscape and testing therapies that are predicted to be effective based on specific mutations, gene expression patterns or signalling abnormalities. To extend these standard precision oncology approaches, the field has strived to complement the otherwise static and often descriptive measurements with functional assays, termed functional precision oncology (FPO). By utilizing diverse PDX and PDX-derived models, FPO has gained traction as an effective preclinical and clinical tool to more precisely recapitulate patient biology using in vivo and ex vivo functional assays. Here, we explore advances and limitations of PDX and PDX-derived models for precision oncology and FPO. We also examine the future of PDX models for precision oncology in the age of artificial intelligence. Integrating these two disciplines could be the key to fast, accurate and cost-effective treatment prediction, revolutionizing oncology and providing patients with cancer with the most effective, personalized treatments.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Cancer, a part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The correct abbreviation for abstracting and indexing purposes is Nat. Rev. Cancer. The international standard serial numbers (ISSN) for Nature Reviews Cancer are 1474-175X (print) and 1474-1768 (online). Unlike other journals, Nature Reviews Cancer does not have an external editorial board. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives relevant to cancer researchers, ensuring that the articles reach the widest possible audience due to their broad scope.