IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
M. Girons Lopez, T. Bosshard, L. Crochemore, I.G. Pechlivanidis
{"title":"Leveraging GCM-based forecasts for enhanced seasonal streamflow prediction in diverse hydrological regimes","authors":"M. Girons Lopez, T. Bosshard, L. Crochemore, I.G. Pechlivanidis","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seasonal hydrological forecasts are vital for managing water resources and adapting to climate change, aiding in diverse planning and decision-making processes. Currently it is unknown how different forecasting methods, considering initial hydrological conditions and dynamic meteorological forcing, perform across the Swedish river systems, despite the significant socio-economic implications. Here we explore the drivers that mostly impact streamflow predictions and attribute the added quality of these predictions to local hydrological regimes. We compare the accuracy of seasonal streamflow forecasts driven by dynamic GCM-based meteorological forecasts with those generated by the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) method. The analysis spans across about 39,500 sub-catchments in Sweden encompassing various climatic, geographical and human-influenced factors. Results show that the streamflow predictability varies in space due to the country’s diverse hydrological regimes. Regardless of the regime, updating the models to achieve the best possible initial conditions is crucial for enhancing forecast skill across all seasons for up to 4 months. GCM-based meteorological forcing notably improves short-term streamflow accuracy, showing significant impact particularly up to 4–8 weeks lead time depending on the local hydrological regime. In the snow-driven northern regions, ESP demonstrates superior performance over GCM-based streamflow forecasts in winter. Conversely, in the southern regions, where conditions are predominantly influenced by rainfall, GCM-based forecasts show higher performance up to 4–6 weeks ahead, regardless of the season. In river systems with high human influences, streamflow climatology outperforms ESP and GCM-based forecasts underscoring the challenges of accurately modelling artificial reservoir management and the need for better access to management data. These insights guide the development of an advanced national seasonal hydrological forecasting service, and highlight the need for region-specific forecasting strategies indicating areas where predictability is enhanced by improved monitoring, hence initial conditions, and/or meteorological forcings. Finally, we discuss the applicability of these forecasting methods to other regions worldwide, thereby placing our new insights within a global context.","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132504","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

季节性水文预报对于管理水资源和适应气候变化至关重要,有助于进行各种规划和决策过程。目前,尽管不同的预报方法对社会经济有重大影响,但考虑到初始水文条件和动态气象强迫因素,这些方法在瑞典河流系统中的表现如何还不得而知。在此,我们探讨了主要影响水流预测的驱动因素,并将这些预测的附加质量归因于当地的水文系统。我们比较了基于动态 GCM 气象预报的季节性流量预测与集合流量预测 (ESP) 方法生成的流量预测的准确性。分析范围涵盖瑞典约 39500 个子流域,包括各种气候、地理和人为影响因素。分析结果表明,由于瑞典的水文体制多种多样,因此水流预测能力在空间上存在差异。无论在哪种水文条件下,更新模型以实现最佳初始条件对于提高所有季节长达 4 个月的预测能力至关重要。基于大气环流模型的气象强迫显著提高了短期流量精度,尤其是在 4-8 周的预报时间内(取决于当地的水文状况)表现出明显的影响。在降雪驱动的北部地区,ESP 在冬季比基于 GCM 的流量预报表现更优。相反,在主要受降雨影响的南部地区,无论季节如何,基于 GCM 的预报都能提前 4-6 周显示出更高的性能。在受人为影响较大的河流系统中,河水流量气候学预报优于 ESP 和基于 GCM 的预报,这凸显了对人工水库管理进行精确建模所面临的挑战,以及更好地获取管理数据的必要性。这些见解为开发先进的国家季节性水文预报服务提供了指导,并强调了针对特定地区的预报策略的必要性,这些地区可通过改进监测、初始条件和/或气象诱因来提高可预测性。最后,我们讨论了这些预报方法对全球其他地区的适用性,从而将我们的新见解置于全球背景之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging GCM-based forecasts for enhanced seasonal streamflow prediction in diverse hydrological regimes
Seasonal hydrological forecasts are vital for managing water resources and adapting to climate change, aiding in diverse planning and decision-making processes. Currently it is unknown how different forecasting methods, considering initial hydrological conditions and dynamic meteorological forcing, perform across the Swedish river systems, despite the significant socio-economic implications. Here we explore the drivers that mostly impact streamflow predictions and attribute the added quality of these predictions to local hydrological regimes. We compare the accuracy of seasonal streamflow forecasts driven by dynamic GCM-based meteorological forecasts with those generated by the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) method. The analysis spans across about 39,500 sub-catchments in Sweden encompassing various climatic, geographical and human-influenced factors. Results show that the streamflow predictability varies in space due to the country’s diverse hydrological regimes. Regardless of the regime, updating the models to achieve the best possible initial conditions is crucial for enhancing forecast skill across all seasons for up to 4 months. GCM-based meteorological forcing notably improves short-term streamflow accuracy, showing significant impact particularly up to 4–8 weeks lead time depending on the local hydrological regime. In the snow-driven northern regions, ESP demonstrates superior performance over GCM-based streamflow forecasts in winter. Conversely, in the southern regions, where conditions are predominantly influenced by rainfall, GCM-based forecasts show higher performance up to 4–6 weeks ahead, regardless of the season. In river systems with high human influences, streamflow climatology outperforms ESP and GCM-based forecasts underscoring the challenges of accurately modelling artificial reservoir management and the need for better access to management data. These insights guide the development of an advanced national seasonal hydrological forecasting service, and highlight the need for region-specific forecasting strategies indicating areas where predictability is enhanced by improved monitoring, hence initial conditions, and/or meteorological forcings. Finally, we discuss the applicability of these forecasting methods to other regions worldwide, thereby placing our new insights within a global context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信