Andrew Houldcroft, Finn Lindgren, Américo Sanhá, Maimuna Jaló, Aissa Regalla de Barros, Kimberley J. Hockings, Elena Bersacola
{"title":"Joint spatial modeling of cluster size and density for a heavily hunted primate persisting in a heterogeneous landscape","authors":"Andrew Houldcroft, Finn Lindgren, Américo Sanhá, Maimuna Jaló, Aissa Regalla de Barros, Kimberley J. Hockings, Elena Bersacola","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shared landscapes in which humans and wildlife coexist, are increasingly recognized as integral to conservation. Fine-scale data on the distribution and density of threatened wildlife are therefore critical to promote long-term coexistence. Yet, the spatial complexity of habitat, anthropic threats and animal behaviour in shared landscapes challenges conventional survey techniques. For social wildlife in particular, the size of sub-groups or clusters is likely to both vary in space and influence detectability, biasing density estimation and spatial prediction. Using the R package ‘inlabru', we develop a full-likelihood joint log-Gaussian Cox process to simultaneously perform spatial distance sampling and model a spatially varying cluster size distribution, which we condition upon detection probability to mitigate cluster-size detection bias. We accommodate spatial dependencies by incorporating a non-stationary Gaussian Markov random field, enabling the explicit inclusion of geographical barriers to wildlife dispersal. We demonstrate this model using 136 georeferenced detections of Campbell's monkey <i>Cercopithecus campbelli</i> clusters, collected with 398.56 km of line transects across a shared agroforest landscape mosaic (1067 km<sup>2</sup>) in Guinea-Bissau. We assess a suite of anthropogenic and environmental spatial covariates, finding that normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and proximity to mangroves are both powerful spatial predictors of density. We captured strong spatial variation in cluster size, likely driven by fission–fusion in response to the complex distribution of resources and risk in the landscape. If left unaccounted for under existing approaches, such variation may bias density surface estimation. We estimate a population of 10 301 (95% CI [7606–14 104]) individuals and produce a fine-scale predictive density map, revealing the importance of mangrove-habitat interfaces for the conservation of this heavily hunted primate. This work demonstrates a powerful, widely applicable approach for monitoring socially flexible wildlife and informing evidence-based conservation in complex, heterogeneous landscapes moving forward.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07399","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人类与野生动物共存的共享景观越来越被认为是保护工作不可或缺的一部分。因此,有关受威胁野生动物分布和密度的精细数据对于促进长期共存至关重要。然而,共享景观中栖息地、人类威胁和动物行为的空间复杂性对传统调查技术提出了挑战。特别是对于社会性野生动物来说,子群或集群的大小既可能在空间中变化,也可能影响可探测性,从而使密度估计和空间预测产生偏差。利用 R 软件包 "inlabru",我们开发了一个全似然联合对数-高斯 Cox 过程,以同时进行空间距离采样和模拟空间变化的集群规模分布,并将其作为检测概率的条件,以减轻集群规模检测偏差。我们通过纳入非稳态高斯马尔科夫随机场来适应空间依赖性,从而能够明确纳入野生动物扩散的地理障碍。我们使用了 136 个坎贝尔猴集群的地理参照检测结果来证明这一模型,这些检测结果是在几内亚比绍的一个共享农林景观镶嵌区(1067 平方公里)中通过 398.56 千米的线段采集的。我们对一系列人为和环境空间协变量进行了评估,发现归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)和靠近红树林的程度都是密度的有力空间预测因素。我们捕捉到了集群规模的强烈空间变化,这可能是由于地貌中资源和风险的复杂分布导致的裂变融合。如果不考虑现有的方法,这种变化可能会使密度面的估计出现偏差。我们估算了一个 10 301(95% CI [7606-14 104])只的种群,并绘制了一张精细的预测密度图,揭示了红树林-栖息地界面对保护这种被大量猎杀的灵长类动物的重要性。这项工作展示了一种强大、广泛适用的方法,可用于监测具有社会灵活性的野生动物,并为复杂、异质地貌中的循证保护工作提供信息。
Joint spatial modeling of cluster size and density for a heavily hunted primate persisting in a heterogeneous landscape
Shared landscapes in which humans and wildlife coexist, are increasingly recognized as integral to conservation. Fine-scale data on the distribution and density of threatened wildlife are therefore critical to promote long-term coexistence. Yet, the spatial complexity of habitat, anthropic threats and animal behaviour in shared landscapes challenges conventional survey techniques. For social wildlife in particular, the size of sub-groups or clusters is likely to both vary in space and influence detectability, biasing density estimation and spatial prediction. Using the R package ‘inlabru', we develop a full-likelihood joint log-Gaussian Cox process to simultaneously perform spatial distance sampling and model a spatially varying cluster size distribution, which we condition upon detection probability to mitigate cluster-size detection bias. We accommodate spatial dependencies by incorporating a non-stationary Gaussian Markov random field, enabling the explicit inclusion of geographical barriers to wildlife dispersal. We demonstrate this model using 136 georeferenced detections of Campbell's monkey Cercopithecus campbelli clusters, collected with 398.56 km of line transects across a shared agroforest landscape mosaic (1067 km2) in Guinea-Bissau. We assess a suite of anthropogenic and environmental spatial covariates, finding that normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and proximity to mangroves are both powerful spatial predictors of density. We captured strong spatial variation in cluster size, likely driven by fission–fusion in response to the complex distribution of resources and risk in the landscape. If left unaccounted for under existing approaches, such variation may bias density surface estimation. We estimate a population of 10 301 (95% CI [7606–14 104]) individuals and produce a fine-scale predictive density map, revealing the importance of mangrove-habitat interfaces for the conservation of this heavily hunted primate. This work demonstrates a powerful, widely applicable approach for monitoring socially flexible wildlife and informing evidence-based conservation in complex, heterogeneous landscapes moving forward.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.