IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Asal M Johnson, Allen Johnson, Robert B Hines, Xiang Zhu
{"title":"Racial differences in carcinoma-in-situ and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer mortality: Accounting for insurance status, black segregation, and neighborhood poverty.","authors":"Asal M Johnson, Allen Johnson, Robert B Hines, Xiang Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few Bladder Cancer (BC) studies have examined the role of area-level variables. The purpose of this study was to examine racial differences in BC survival to elucidate if insurance status and contextual covariates could explain Black disadvantage in survival.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models (sHR), five-year survival time was calculated from the date of diagnosis until the last day of follow-up or the date of death due to BC in Florida 2000-2014 (n = 32,321). Non-BC deaths were considered a competing risk. In all models, individual-level clinical and demographic variables were adjusted for and we included the exposures of interest for Carcinoma-in-Situ (CIS) and Non-Muscle-Invasive BC(NMIBC), separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CIS-Patients, living in neighborhoods with higher levels of segregation was associated with 50 % to 2-fold increase in sHR (medium level segregation sHR= 1.50, 95 % CI: 1.06-2.13; high level segregation sHR= 2.07, 95 % CI: 1.25-3.43). Uninsured CIS patients had more than 2-fold increased sHR compared to those with private insurance (sHR=2.34, 95 % CI: 1.05-5.24). In NMIBC patients, living in areas with level of poverty resulted in 10 % the hazard of death increased when compared to low poverty (high poverty sHR=1.11, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.21). Uninsured and Medicaid covered NMIBC patients had an increased sHR (uninsured sHR=2.05, 95 % CI: 1.62-2.59; Medicaid sHR=1.36, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.67). For both CIS and NMIBC patients, the Black/White survival gap decreased when insurance and contextual variables were included.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified BC survival rates were different for Black and White patients in Florida and found that those observed gaps were, to some extent, linked to broader social factors. We recommend that future cancer studies examining racial disparities incorporate area-level variables to offer a more nuanced understanding of these complex disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"102728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2024.102728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少有膀胱癌(BC)研究对地区级变量的作用进行研究。本研究旨在探讨膀胱癌患者生存率的种族差异,以阐明保险状况和环境协变量是否能解释黑人在生存率方面的劣势:方法:使用细-灰次分布危险模型(sHR),计算2000-2014年佛罗里达州(n = 32,321)从诊断之日起至随访最后一天或因BC死亡之日止的五年生存时间。非 BC 死亡被视为竞争风险。在所有模型中,我们对个人临床和人口统计学变量进行了调整,并分别纳入了原位癌(CIS)和非肌浸润性BC(NMIBC)的相关暴露:在CIS患者中,居住在隔离水平较高的社区与sHR增加50%至2倍有关(中等隔离水平sHR=1.50,95% CI:1.06-2.13;高隔离水平sHR=2.07,95% CI:1.25-3.43)。与有私人保险的 CIS 患者相比,没有保险的 CIS 患者的 sHR 增加了 2 倍多(sHR=2.34,95 % CI:1.05-5.24)。在 NMIBC 患者中,与低度贫困地区相比,生活在贫困地区的患者死亡风险增加了 10%(高度贫困 sHR=1.11, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.21)。未参保和享受医疗补助的 NMIBC 患者的 sHR 增加(未参保的 sHR=2.05,95 % CI:1.62-2.59;医疗补助的 sHR=1.36,95 % CI:1.11-1.67)。对于CIS和NMIBC患者而言,如果将保险和环境变量包括在内,黑人/白人的生存率差距会缩小:这项研究发现,佛罗里达州的黑人和白人 BC 患者的生存率存在差异,并发现这些观察到的差距在一定程度上与更广泛的社会因素有关。我们建议,未来研究种族差异的癌症研究应纳入地区层面的变量,以便更细致地了解这些复杂的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial differences in carcinoma-in-situ and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer mortality: Accounting for insurance status, black segregation, and neighborhood poverty.

Background: Few Bladder Cancer (BC) studies have examined the role of area-level variables. The purpose of this study was to examine racial differences in BC survival to elucidate if insurance status and contextual covariates could explain Black disadvantage in survival.

Method: Using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models (sHR), five-year survival time was calculated from the date of diagnosis until the last day of follow-up or the date of death due to BC in Florida 2000-2014 (n = 32,321). Non-BC deaths were considered a competing risk. In all models, individual-level clinical and demographic variables were adjusted for and we included the exposures of interest for Carcinoma-in-Situ (CIS) and Non-Muscle-Invasive BC(NMIBC), separately.

Results: In CIS-Patients, living in neighborhoods with higher levels of segregation was associated with 50 % to 2-fold increase in sHR (medium level segregation sHR= 1.50, 95 % CI: 1.06-2.13; high level segregation sHR= 2.07, 95 % CI: 1.25-3.43). Uninsured CIS patients had more than 2-fold increased sHR compared to those with private insurance (sHR=2.34, 95 % CI: 1.05-5.24). In NMIBC patients, living in areas with level of poverty resulted in 10 % the hazard of death increased when compared to low poverty (high poverty sHR=1.11, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.21). Uninsured and Medicaid covered NMIBC patients had an increased sHR (uninsured sHR=2.05, 95 % CI: 1.62-2.59; Medicaid sHR=1.36, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.67). For both CIS and NMIBC patients, the Black/White survival gap decreased when insurance and contextual variables were included.

Conclusion: This study identified BC survival rates were different for Black and White patients in Florida and found that those observed gaps were, to some extent, linked to broader social factors. We recommend that future cancer studies examining racial disparities incorporate area-level variables to offer a more nuanced understanding of these complex disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology
Cancer Epidemiology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including: • Descriptive epidemiology • Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis • Screening and early detection • Prevention and control • Methodological issues The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信