Érika Mayumi Omoto , Paulo Henrique dos Santos , Mirela Sanae Shinohara , Paulo Roberto Marão de Andrade Carvalho , Anderson Catelan , Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
{"title":"不同粘连策略在非龋齿宫颈病变修复中的临床表现:一项为期四年的随机临床试验。","authors":"Érika Mayumi Omoto , Paulo Henrique dos Santos , Mirela Sanae Shinohara , Paulo Roberto Marão de Andrade Carvalho , Anderson Catelan , Ticiane Cestari Fagundes","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the retention rate and other clinical criteria of four different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 4 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and split-mouth study evaluating four different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: adhesive restorative system (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive/Filtek Z350XT) without (SBU) and with selective enamel acid-etching (E-SBU), resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer; RMGIC), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic as acid pretreatment (E-RMGIC). In total, 200 restorations were placed in 50 patients. Good health, no allergies to dental products, adequate oral hygiene were inclusion criteria. Pregnancy, active caries, use of desensitizers/fluoride, orthodontic appliances, and severe bruxism were exclusion criteria. All restorations were scored regarding retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture, wear, secondary caries, anatomical form, surface staining, color match, and inflammation of gingival tissue marginal adaptation, using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at baseline and after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years. Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Wilcoxon were used (<em>p</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 40 patients returned for the follow-up. RMGIC and E-RMGIC presented more alteration in surface texture than SBU and E-SBU. SBU had lower retention at four years than at baseline. Decreased alpha scores for marginal integrity and marginal discoloration were observed for all groups after four years when compared to baseline. Survival curves, related to retention, presented no statistical differences among groups (<em>p</em> = 0.315).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NCCLs restored with ionomer had more reduction in surface luster than resin composite restorations. The use of selective enamel etching promoted less loss of retention for universal adhesive. The increase of initial marginal defects occurred for all types of adhesion strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The use of selective enamel etching cause less loss of retention for universal adhesive used in NCCL. Initial marginal defects occur for all types of adhesion strategies after four years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical performance of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: A four-year randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Érika Mayumi Omoto , Paulo Henrique dos Santos , Mirela Sanae Shinohara , Paulo Roberto Marão de Andrade Carvalho , Anderson Catelan , Ticiane Cestari Fagundes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the retention rate and other clinical criteria of four different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 4 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and split-mouth study evaluating four different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: adhesive restorative system (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive/Filtek Z350XT) without (SBU) and with selective enamel acid-etching (E-SBU), resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer; RMGIC), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic as acid pretreatment (E-RMGIC). In total, 200 restorations were placed in 50 patients. Good health, no allergies to dental products, adequate oral hygiene were inclusion criteria. Pregnancy, active caries, use of desensitizers/fluoride, orthodontic appliances, and severe bruxism were exclusion criteria. All restorations were scored regarding retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture, wear, secondary caries, anatomical form, surface staining, color match, and inflammation of gingival tissue marginal adaptation, using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at baseline and after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years. Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Wilcoxon were used (<em>p</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 40 patients returned for the follow-up. RMGIC and E-RMGIC presented more alteration in surface texture than SBU and E-SBU. SBU had lower retention at four years than at baseline. Decreased alpha scores for marginal integrity and marginal discoloration were observed for all groups after four years when compared to baseline. Survival curves, related to retention, presented no statistical differences among groups (<em>p</em> = 0.315).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NCCLs restored with ionomer had more reduction in surface luster than resin composite restorations. The use of selective enamel etching promoted less loss of retention for universal adhesive. The increase of initial marginal defects occurred for all types of adhesion strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The use of selective enamel etching cause less loss of retention for universal adhesive used in NCCL. Initial marginal defects occur for all types of adhesion strategies after four years.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224006985\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224006985","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical performance of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: A four-year randomized clinical trial
Objective
To evaluate the retention rate and other clinical criteria of four different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 4 years.
Methods
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and split-mouth study evaluating four different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: adhesive restorative system (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive/Filtek Z350XT) without (SBU) and with selective enamel acid-etching (E-SBU), resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer; RMGIC), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic as acid pretreatment (E-RMGIC). In total, 200 restorations were placed in 50 patients. Good health, no allergies to dental products, adequate oral hygiene were inclusion criteria. Pregnancy, active caries, use of desensitizers/fluoride, orthodontic appliances, and severe bruxism were exclusion criteria. All restorations were scored regarding retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture, wear, secondary caries, anatomical form, surface staining, color match, and inflammation of gingival tissue marginal adaptation, using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at baseline and after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years. Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Wilcoxon were used (p < 0.05).
Results
In total, 40 patients returned for the follow-up. RMGIC and E-RMGIC presented more alteration in surface texture than SBU and E-SBU. SBU had lower retention at four years than at baseline. Decreased alpha scores for marginal integrity and marginal discoloration were observed for all groups after four years when compared to baseline. Survival curves, related to retention, presented no statistical differences among groups (p = 0.315).
Conclusions
NCCLs restored with ionomer had more reduction in surface luster than resin composite restorations. The use of selective enamel etching promoted less loss of retention for universal adhesive. The increase of initial marginal defects occurred for all types of adhesion strategies.
Clinical relevance
The use of selective enamel etching cause less loss of retention for universal adhesive used in NCCL. Initial marginal defects occur for all types of adhesion strategies after four years.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.