超声引导下锯肌前平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞对儿童电视胸腔镜手术术后镇痛的影响:一项随机比较研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Elsayed Elemam , Ibrahim Abdelbaser , Mahmoud Abdelfattah , Ahmed Amin Eisa , Ahmed Gamal Moursi , Mohamed Y. Yousef Abd Allah , Ahmed Alaidy , Reem Abdelraouf Elsharkawy , Ahmed Farid , Eiad Ramzy , Samah Elkenany , Tarek Habeeb , Ramy Sabry , Mohamed Tharwat , May Elsherbiny Badr
{"title":"超声引导下锯肌前平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞对儿童电视胸腔镜手术术后镇痛的影响:一项随机比较研究。","authors":"Elsayed Elemam ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Abdelbaser ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Abdelfattah ,&nbsp;Ahmed Amin Eisa ,&nbsp;Ahmed Gamal Moursi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Y. Yousef Abd Allah ,&nbsp;Ahmed Alaidy ,&nbsp;Reem Abdelraouf Elsharkawy ,&nbsp;Ahmed Farid ,&nbsp;Eiad Ramzy ,&nbsp;Samah Elkenany ,&nbsp;Tarek Habeeb ,&nbsp;Ramy Sabry ,&nbsp;Mohamed Tharwat ,&nbsp;May Elsherbiny Badr","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.09.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) in children undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Operating room and intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A single-center, randomized, comparative, open-labeled study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Seventy pediatric patients aged 2 to 10 years who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were enrolled.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patients were equally randomized into 2 groups. In the SAPB group, patients were injected with 0.4 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance into the deep SAPB and in the PVB group, patients were injected with 0.4 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance into the thoracic paravertebral space.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>The primary outcome was morphine consumption within the first 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale pain score, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, and the time required to perform the block. The median (Q1, Q3) morphine consumption (mg/kg) in the first postoperative 24 hours was similar in the SAPB and PVB groups (0.15 [0.1-0.2], 0.1 [0.1-0.2], respectively). The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale pain score was similar in both the SAPB and PVB groups at all-time points. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was comparable in both groups. Time needed to perform the block was shorter in SAPB than PVB.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SAPB provides effective postoperative pain control, similar to thoracic PVB. Moreover, it is technically easier and has a shorter time to perform than PVB. Therefore, SAPB is an effective and safe alternative to thoracic PVB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"39 3","pages":"Pages 742-749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Elsayed Elemam ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Abdelbaser ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Abdelfattah ,&nbsp;Ahmed Amin Eisa ,&nbsp;Ahmed Gamal Moursi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Y. Yousef Abd Allah ,&nbsp;Ahmed Alaidy ,&nbsp;Reem Abdelraouf Elsharkawy ,&nbsp;Ahmed Farid ,&nbsp;Eiad Ramzy ,&nbsp;Samah Elkenany ,&nbsp;Tarek Habeeb ,&nbsp;Ramy Sabry ,&nbsp;Mohamed Tharwat ,&nbsp;May Elsherbiny Badr\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.09.134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) in children undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Operating room and intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A single-center, randomized, comparative, open-labeled study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Seventy pediatric patients aged 2 to 10 years who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were enrolled.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patients were equally randomized into 2 groups. In the SAPB group, patients were injected with 0.4 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance into the deep SAPB and in the PVB group, patients were injected with 0.4 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance into the thoracic paravertebral space.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>The primary outcome was morphine consumption within the first 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale pain score, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, and the time required to perform the block. The median (Q1, Q3) morphine consumption (mg/kg) in the first postoperative 24 hours was similar in the SAPB and PVB groups (0.15 [0.1-0.2], 0.1 [0.1-0.2], respectively). The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale pain score was similar in both the SAPB and PVB groups at all-time points. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was comparable in both groups. Time needed to perform the block was shorter in SAPB than PVB.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SAPB provides effective postoperative pain control, similar to thoracic PVB. Moreover, it is technically easier and has a shorter time to perform than PVB. Therefore, SAPB is an effective and safe alternative to thoracic PVB.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 742-749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077024007614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077024007614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较电视胸腔镜下儿童手术后锯肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)与胸椎旁阻滞(PVB)的镇痛效果。环境:三级医院的手术室和加护病房。设计:单中心、随机、比较、开放标记研究。参与者:70例2至10岁的儿童患者接受了视频胸腔镜手术。干预措施:患者随机分为两组。SAPB组患者在超声引导下向SAPB深部注射0.4 mL/kg 0.25%布比卡因,PVB组患者在超声引导下向胸椎旁间隙注射0.4 mL/kg 0.25%布比卡因。测量方法和主要结果:主要观察术后24小时内吗啡的使用情况。次要结果为东安大略儿童医院疼痛量表疼痛评分、术中芬太尼用量和阻滞所需时间。SAPB组和PVB组术后第24小时吗啡用量中位数(Q1、Q3)相似,分别为0.15[0.1-0.2]、0.1[0.1-0.2]。东安大略儿童医院疼痛量表疼痛评分在SAPB组和PVB组在所有时间点上相似。两组术中芬太尼用量相当。SAPB组的阻滞时间比PVB组短。结论:SAPB提供了有效的术后疼痛控制,类似于胸椎PVB。此外,它在技术上比PVB更容易,执行时间也更短。因此,SAPB是一种安全有效的胸椎PVB替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Comparative Study

Objectives

This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) in children undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Setting

Operating room and intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital.

Design

A single-center, randomized, comparative, open-labeled study.

Participants

Seventy pediatric patients aged 2 to 10 years who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were enrolled.

Interventions

Patients were equally randomized into 2 groups. In the SAPB group, patients were injected with 0.4 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance into the deep SAPB and in the PVB group, patients were injected with 0.4 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance into the thoracic paravertebral space.

Measurements and Main Results

The primary outcome was morphine consumption within the first 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale pain score, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, and the time required to perform the block. The median (Q1, Q3) morphine consumption (mg/kg) in the first postoperative 24 hours was similar in the SAPB and PVB groups (0.15 [0.1-0.2], 0.1 [0.1-0.2], respectively). The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale pain score was similar in both the SAPB and PVB groups at all-time points. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was comparable in both groups. Time needed to perform the block was shorter in SAPB than PVB.

Conclusions

SAPB provides effective postoperative pain control, similar to thoracic PVB. Moreover, it is technically easier and has a shorter time to perform than PVB. Therefore, SAPB is an effective and safe alternative to thoracic PVB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信