颈动脉内膜中层厚度随基线血压水平的长期变化:J-STARS Echo 研究。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123342
Shinichi Wada, Masatoshi Koga, Tatsuo Kagimura, Kazunori Toyoda, Yoji Nagai, Shiro Aoki, Tomohisa Nezu, Naohisa Hosomi, Hideki Origasa, Toshiho Ohtsuki, Hirofumi Maruyama, Masahiro Yasaka, Kazuo Kitagawa, Shinichiro Uchiyama, Kazuo Minematsu, Masayasu Matsumoto
{"title":"颈动脉内膜中层厚度随基线血压水平的长期变化:J-STARS Echo 研究。","authors":"Shinichi Wada, Masatoshi Koga, Tatsuo Kagimura, Kazunori Toyoda, Yoji Nagai, Shiro Aoki, Tomohisa Nezu, Naohisa Hosomi, Hideki Origasa, Toshiho Ohtsuki, Hirofumi Maruyama, Masahiro Yasaka, Kazuo Kitagawa, Shinichiro Uchiyama, Kazuo Minematsu, Masayasu Matsumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to investigate long-term changes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) based on baseline blood pressure (BP) levels in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 45-80 years with dyslipidemia who were not on statins before enrollment and had experienced a non-cardioembolic stroke were assigned to either the pravastatin group or the control group in a randomized trial. Patients were classified into three groups according to BP levels: normal BP (N-group: systolic BP [sBP] <140 mmHg and diastolic BP [dBP] <90 mmHg), highly elevated BP (G2 group: sBP ≥160 mmHg or dBP ≥100 mmHg), and mildly elevated BP (G1 group: the remaining patients). Mixed effect models were used to examine differences in slope of mean carotid IMT increases annually over the 5-year observation period among three groups, and for two groups divided based on whether they were above or below certain BP cut-off levels set at every 1 mmHg, ranging between 139 and 161 mmHg for sBP, and 89-101 mmHg for dBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 792 patients, baseline mean carotid IMT in the G1-group (0.908 ± 0.152 mm) and G2-group (0.905 ± 0.145 mm) was significantly higher than the N-group (0.870 ± 0.153 mm) (P < 0.01, for both respectively). Although there was no significant difference in the increase among three groups (P = 0.091), the increase in patients above sBP 154, 159 and 160 mmHg or dBP 101 mmHg at baseline was higher than others (P < 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High baseline BP correlated with a high baseline carotid IMT and its subsequent 5-year increase in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov.</p><p><strong>Unique identifier: </strong>NCT00361530.</p>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":"468 ","pages":"123342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term changes in carotid intima-media thickness according to baseline blood pressure level: J-STARS Echo study.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Wada, Masatoshi Koga, Tatsuo Kagimura, Kazunori Toyoda, Yoji Nagai, Shiro Aoki, Tomohisa Nezu, Naohisa Hosomi, Hideki Origasa, Toshiho Ohtsuki, Hirofumi Maruyama, Masahiro Yasaka, Kazuo Kitagawa, Shinichiro Uchiyama, Kazuo Minematsu, Masayasu Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to investigate long-term changes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) based on baseline blood pressure (BP) levels in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 45-80 years with dyslipidemia who were not on statins before enrollment and had experienced a non-cardioembolic stroke were assigned to either the pravastatin group or the control group in a randomized trial. Patients were classified into three groups according to BP levels: normal BP (N-group: systolic BP [sBP] <140 mmHg and diastolic BP [dBP] <90 mmHg), highly elevated BP (G2 group: sBP ≥160 mmHg or dBP ≥100 mmHg), and mildly elevated BP (G1 group: the remaining patients). Mixed effect models were used to examine differences in slope of mean carotid IMT increases annually over the 5-year observation period among three groups, and for two groups divided based on whether they were above or below certain BP cut-off levels set at every 1 mmHg, ranging between 139 and 161 mmHg for sBP, and 89-101 mmHg for dBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 792 patients, baseline mean carotid IMT in the G1-group (0.908 ± 0.152 mm) and G2-group (0.905 ± 0.145 mm) was significantly higher than the N-group (0.870 ± 0.153 mm) (P < 0.01, for both respectively). Although there was no significant difference in the increase among three groups (P = 0.091), the increase in patients above sBP 154, 159 and 160 mmHg or dBP 101 mmHg at baseline was higher than others (P < 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High baseline BP correlated with a high baseline carotid IMT and its subsequent 5-year increase in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov.</p><p><strong>Unique identifier: </strong>NCT00361530.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"468 \",\"pages\":\"123342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.123342\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.123342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的我们旨在研究非心血管栓塞性卒中患者颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)在基线血压(BP)水平基础上的长期变化:在一项随机试验中,年龄在45-80岁之间、入组前未服用他汀类药物且经历过非心肌栓塞性卒中的血脂异常患者被分配到普伐他汀组或对照组。根据血压水平将患者分为三组:正常血压组(N组:收缩压[sBP] 结果:正常血压组(N组:收缩压[sBP在 792 名患者中,G1 组(0.908 ± 0.152 mm)和 G2 组(0.905 ± 0.145 mm)的基线平均颈动脉内径明显高于 N 组(0.870 ± 0.153 mm)(P 结论:高基线血压与颈动脉内径相关:高基线血压与非心肌栓塞性卒中患者高基线颈动脉IMT及其随后5年的增加相关。临床试验注册:http://www.Clinicaltrials: gov.唯一标识符:NCT00361530:NCT00361530。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term changes in carotid intima-media thickness according to baseline blood pressure level: J-STARS Echo study.

Background and aims: We aimed to investigate long-term changes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) based on baseline blood pressure (BP) levels in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.

Methods: Patients aged 45-80 years with dyslipidemia who were not on statins before enrollment and had experienced a non-cardioembolic stroke were assigned to either the pravastatin group or the control group in a randomized trial. Patients were classified into three groups according to BP levels: normal BP (N-group: systolic BP [sBP] <140 mmHg and diastolic BP [dBP] <90 mmHg), highly elevated BP (G2 group: sBP ≥160 mmHg or dBP ≥100 mmHg), and mildly elevated BP (G1 group: the remaining patients). Mixed effect models were used to examine differences in slope of mean carotid IMT increases annually over the 5-year observation period among three groups, and for two groups divided based on whether they were above or below certain BP cut-off levels set at every 1 mmHg, ranging between 139 and 161 mmHg for sBP, and 89-101 mmHg for dBP.

Results: Of 792 patients, baseline mean carotid IMT in the G1-group (0.908 ± 0.152 mm) and G2-group (0.905 ± 0.145 mm) was significantly higher than the N-group (0.870 ± 0.153 mm) (P < 0.01, for both respectively). Although there was no significant difference in the increase among three groups (P = 0.091), the increase in patients above sBP 154, 159 and 160 mmHg or dBP 101 mmHg at baseline was higher than others (P < 0.05 for all).

Conclusions: High baseline BP correlated with a high baseline carotid IMT and its subsequent 5-year increase in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.

Clinical trial registration: http://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov.

Unique identifier: NCT00361530.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信