连续脊束肌平面阻滞对微创心脏手术患者术后恢复的影响:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Current Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1007/s11596-024-2593-4
Lin Jin, Ying Yu, Peng Miao, Yi-Hao Huang, Shu-Qing Yu, Ke-Fang Guo
{"title":"连续脊束肌平面阻滞对微创心脏手术患者术后恢复的影响:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Lin Jin, Ying Yu, Peng Miao, Yi-Hao Huang, Shu-Qing Yu, Ke-Fang Guo","doi":"10.1007/s11596-024-2593-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) improves the quality of recovery (QoR) and decreases postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 120 patients were randomized to groups at a 1:1 ratio. They received general anaesthesia and an ESP catheter (ropivacaine or normal saline) before surgery, and received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil and continuous ESPB with a pulse injection of 8 mL (ropivacaine or normal saline) per h after 20 mL of the experimental drug was administered at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) score at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the severity of pain, sufentanil consumption, incidence of rescue analgesia, and proportion of patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QoR-15 score was greater in the ESPB group than in the control group at 24 h after surgery [112 (108-118) vs. 109 (101-114), P=0.023]. ESPB was associated with a lower cough visual analogue scale (VAS) score (44 vs. 47, P=0.001), resting VAS score (28 vs. 35.5, P=0.003), sufentanil consumption (104.8 µg vs. 145.5 µg, P=0.000), and incidence of rescue analgesia (20.0% vs. 43.3%, P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous ESPB mildly improved the QoR-15 score in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery and reduced postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and the incidence of rescue analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10820,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Jin, Ying Yu, Peng Miao, Yi-Hao Huang, Shu-Qing Yu, Ke-Fang Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11596-024-2593-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) improves the quality of recovery (QoR) and decreases postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 120 patients were randomized to groups at a 1:1 ratio. They received general anaesthesia and an ESP catheter (ropivacaine or normal saline) before surgery, and received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil and continuous ESPB with a pulse injection of 8 mL (ropivacaine or normal saline) per h after 20 mL of the experimental drug was administered at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) score at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the severity of pain, sufentanil consumption, incidence of rescue analgesia, and proportion of patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QoR-15 score was greater in the ESPB group than in the control group at 24 h after surgery [112 (108-118) vs. 109 (101-114), P=0.023]. ESPB was associated with a lower cough visual analogue scale (VAS) score (44 vs. 47, P=0.001), resting VAS score (28 vs. 35.5, P=0.003), sufentanil consumption (104.8 µg vs. 145.5 µg, P=0.000), and incidence of rescue analgesia (20.0% vs. 43.3%, P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous ESPB mildly improved the QoR-15 score in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery and reduced postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and the incidence of rescue analgesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1103-1112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2593-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2593-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨连续竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)是否能改善微创心脏手术患者的康复质量(QoR),减轻术后急慢性疼痛。方法:这是一项单中心、双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验。120例患者按1:1的比例随机分组。术前给予全身麻醉和ESP导管(罗哌卡因或生理盐水),术后给予实验药物20 mL后,患者自行控制舒芬太尼静脉镇痛和连续ESPB,每小时脉冲注射8 mL(罗哌卡因或生理盐水)。主要观察指标为术后24 h 15项恢复质量量表(QoR-15)评分。次要结局包括疼痛严重程度、舒芬太尼用量、抢救性镇痛发生率和慢性疼痛患者比例。结果:术后24 h, ESPB组QoR-15评分高于对照组[112(108-118)比109 (101-114),P=0.023]。ESPB与较低的咳嗽视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分(44比47,P=0.001)、静息VAS评分(28比35.5,P=0.003)、舒芬太尼消耗(104.8µg比145.5µg, P=0.000)和救急镇痛发生率(20.0%比43.3%,P=0.006)相关。结论:持续ESPB可轻度改善微创心脏手术患者的QoR-15评分,降低术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗和救助性镇痛发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Objective: To investigate whether continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) improves the quality of recovery (QoR) and decreases postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Methods: This was a single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 120 patients were randomized to groups at a 1:1 ratio. They received general anaesthesia and an ESP catheter (ropivacaine or normal saline) before surgery, and received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil and continuous ESPB with a pulse injection of 8 mL (ropivacaine or normal saline) per h after 20 mL of the experimental drug was administered at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) score at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the severity of pain, sufentanil consumption, incidence of rescue analgesia, and proportion of patients with chronic pain.

Results: The QoR-15 score was greater in the ESPB group than in the control group at 24 h after surgery [112 (108-118) vs. 109 (101-114), P=0.023]. ESPB was associated with a lower cough visual analogue scale (VAS) score (44 vs. 47, P=0.001), resting VAS score (28 vs. 35.5, P=0.003), sufentanil consumption (104.8 µg vs. 145.5 µg, P=0.000), and incidence of rescue analgesia (20.0% vs. 43.3%, P=0.006).

Conclusion: Continuous ESPB mildly improved the QoR-15 score in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery and reduced postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and the incidence of rescue analgesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Science
Current Medical Science Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Current Medical Science provides a forum for peer-reviewed papers in the medical sciences, to promote academic exchange between Chinese researchers and doctors and their foreign counterparts. The journal covers the subjects of biomedicine such as physiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, pathology and pathophysiology, etc., and clinical research, such as surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and otorhinolaryngology etc. The articles appearing in Current Medical Science are mainly in English, with a very small number of its papers in German, to pay tribute to its German founder. This journal is the only medical periodical in Western languages sponsored by an educational institution located in the central part of China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信