ARC-HBR标准在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的应用。吸烟作为额外出血风险因素的意义。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Henri Kesti, Kalle Mattila, Samuli Jaakkola, Joonas Lehto, Nea Söderblom, Kalle Kalliovalkama, Pekka Porela
{"title":"ARC-HBR标准在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的应用。吸烟作为额外出血风险因素的意义。","authors":"Henri Kesti, Kalle Mattila, Samuli Jaakkola, Joonas Lehto, Nea Söderblom, Kalle Kalliovalkama, Pekka Porela","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Criteria (ARC-HBR) are recommended by guidelines for bleeding risk assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to identify possible other risk factors and adjust the original ARC-HBR criteria for confounders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive STEMI patients managed in a Finnish tertiary hospital between 2016-2022 were identified using a database search. Data collection was done by reviewing electronic patient records. Bleeding risk was assessed according to the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary endpoint was non-access site bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding during 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1548 STEMI patients were analysed. HBR criteria was fulfilled in 661 (42.7%). Multivariable competing risk analysis identified only 4 individual ARC-HBR criteria as independent risk factors for bleeding. Smoking status was identified as a novel bleeding risk factor. Current and former smokers had increased bleeding risk compared with never smokers (hazard ratio [HR] 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-5.61 and HR 1.99, CI 1.19-3.34). In those not meeting any ARC-HBR criteria, cumulative BARC 3 or 5 incidence of current smoking was 3.40% and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) 1.36%. Thus, exceeding ARC-HBR definition for a major criterion. In the non-HBR group the prevalence of current smoking was 40.4% (n = 358).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current and former smoking predicts major bleeding complications after STEMI. Current smoking is highly prevalent among those classified as non-HBR according to the ARC-HBR criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the ARC-HBR Criteria in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Significance of Smoking as an Additional Bleeding Risk Factor.\",\"authors\":\"Henri Kesti, Kalle Mattila, Samuli Jaakkola, Joonas Lehto, Nea Söderblom, Kalle Kalliovalkama, Pekka Porela\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Criteria (ARC-HBR) are recommended by guidelines for bleeding risk assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to identify possible other risk factors and adjust the original ARC-HBR criteria for confounders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive STEMI patients managed in a Finnish tertiary hospital between 2016-2022 were identified using a database search. Data collection was done by reviewing electronic patient records. Bleeding risk was assessed according to the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary endpoint was non-access site bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding during 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1548 STEMI patients were analysed. HBR criteria was fulfilled in 661 (42.7%). Multivariable competing risk analysis identified only 4 individual ARC-HBR criteria as independent risk factors for bleeding. Smoking status was identified as a novel bleeding risk factor. Current and former smokers had increased bleeding risk compared with never smokers (hazard ratio [HR] 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-5.61 and HR 1.99, CI 1.19-3.34). In those not meeting any ARC-HBR criteria, cumulative BARC 3 or 5 incidence of current smoking was 3.40% and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) 1.36%. Thus, exceeding ARC-HBR definition for a major criterion. In the non-HBR group the prevalence of current smoking was 40.4% (n = 358).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current and former smoking predicts major bleeding complications after STEMI. Current smoking is highly prevalent among those classified as non-HBR according to the ARC-HBR criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:高出血风险标准学术研究联盟(ARC-HBR)被st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)出血风险评估指南推荐。本研究的目的是确定可能的其他危险因素,并调整原有的ARC-HBR混杂因素标准。方法:通过数据库检索确定2016-2022年间在芬兰三级医院管理的所有连续STEMI患者。数据收集是通过查看电子病历完成的。根据ARC-HBR标准评估出血风险。主要终点为1年随访期间非通路部位出血学术研究联盟(BARC) 3型或5型出血。结果:共分析STEMI患者1548例。661例(42.7%)符合HBR标准。多变量竞争风险分析发现只有4个单独的ARC-HBR标准是出血的独立危险因素。吸烟状况被确定为新的出血危险因素。与从不吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者和曾经吸烟者的出血风险增加(风险比[HR] 3.01, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.62-5.61;风险比[HR] 1.99, CI 1.19-3.34)。在不符合任何ARC-HBR标准的患者中,目前吸烟的累积BARC 3或5发生率为3.40%,颅内出血(ICH)发生率为1.36%。因此,超过ARC-HBR定义为主要标准。在非hbr组中,当前吸烟率为40.4% (n = 358)。结论:当前和既往吸烟可预测STEMI后的主要出血并发症。根据ARC-HBR标准,目前吸烟在被归类为非hbr的人群中非常普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of the ARC-HBR Criteria in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Significance of Smoking as an Additional Bleeding Risk Factor.

Background and aims: The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Criteria (ARC-HBR) are recommended by guidelines for bleeding risk assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to identify possible other risk factors and adjust the original ARC-HBR criteria for confounders.

Methods: All consecutive STEMI patients managed in a Finnish tertiary hospital between 2016-2022 were identified using a database search. Data collection was done by reviewing electronic patient records. Bleeding risk was assessed according to the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary endpoint was non-access site bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding during 1-year follow-up.

Results: A total of 1548 STEMI patients were analysed. HBR criteria was fulfilled in 661 (42.7%). Multivariable competing risk analysis identified only 4 individual ARC-HBR criteria as independent risk factors for bleeding. Smoking status was identified as a novel bleeding risk factor. Current and former smokers had increased bleeding risk compared with never smokers (hazard ratio [HR] 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-5.61 and HR 1.99, CI 1.19-3.34). In those not meeting any ARC-HBR criteria, cumulative BARC 3 or 5 incidence of current smoking was 3.40% and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) 1.36%. Thus, exceeding ARC-HBR definition for a major criterion. In the non-HBR group the prevalence of current smoking was 40.4% (n = 358).

Conclusions: Current and former smoking predicts major bleeding complications after STEMI. Current smoking is highly prevalent among those classified as non-HBR according to the ARC-HBR criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信