环境信用评价体系如何影响企业污染排放?来自中国的证据。

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shulong Guo, Yuan Yang, Longge Neng
{"title":"环境信用评价体系如何影响企业污染排放?来自中国的证据。","authors":"Shulong Guo, Yuan Yang, Longge Neng","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The environmental credit evaluation system (ECES), which integrates control, market, and contractual elements as a novel comprehensive environmental regulation tool, has been piloted in China since the late 1990s. The effectiveness of this system in improving environmental conditions and the mechanisms through which it operates have attracted significant attention. This study utilizes the pilot implementation of the ECES as a quasi-natural experiment, integrating data from Chinese industrial firms and pollution statistics from 2003 to 2014. Employing a difference-in-differences approach with multiple time points, we conduct an empirical assessment of the ECES's impact on pollution reduction. The results indicate that the ECES effectively curtails corporate pollution emissions. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the pollution reduction effects are more pronounced in state-owned firms, large-scale firms, and in regions with stringent environmental regulations and high public environmental awareness. Mechanism testing demonstrates that the ECES mitigates pollution emissions primarily by alleviating financing constraints and promoting positive environmental behaviors. In terms of proactive pollution prevention and end-of-pipe treatment, the latter is more significantly influenced by the incentives provided by the ECES. Further analysis indicates that specific features of the ECES, such as mandatory participation and the establishment of credit ratings, are particularly conducive to enhancing its pollution reduction efficacy. The conclusions drawn from this study reinforce the micro-foundations of the ECES and offer insightful recommendations for its refinement and for promoting synergistic development between environmental and economic objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"373 ","pages":"123643"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the environmental credit evaluation system affects corporate pollution emissions: Evidence from China.\",\"authors\":\"Shulong Guo, Yuan Yang, Longge Neng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The environmental credit evaluation system (ECES), which integrates control, market, and contractual elements as a novel comprehensive environmental regulation tool, has been piloted in China since the late 1990s. The effectiveness of this system in improving environmental conditions and the mechanisms through which it operates have attracted significant attention. This study utilizes the pilot implementation of the ECES as a quasi-natural experiment, integrating data from Chinese industrial firms and pollution statistics from 2003 to 2014. Employing a difference-in-differences approach with multiple time points, we conduct an empirical assessment of the ECES's impact on pollution reduction. The results indicate that the ECES effectively curtails corporate pollution emissions. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the pollution reduction effects are more pronounced in state-owned firms, large-scale firms, and in regions with stringent environmental regulations and high public environmental awareness. Mechanism testing demonstrates that the ECES mitigates pollution emissions primarily by alleviating financing constraints and promoting positive environmental behaviors. In terms of proactive pollution prevention and end-of-pipe treatment, the latter is more significantly influenced by the incentives provided by the ECES. Further analysis indicates that specific features of the ECES, such as mandatory participation and the establishment of credit ratings, are particularly conducive to enhancing its pollution reduction efficacy. The conclusions drawn from this study reinforce the micro-foundations of the ECES and offer insightful recommendations for its refinement and for promoting synergistic development between environmental and economic objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"373 \",\"pages\":\"123643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123643\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境信用评价体系(ECES)作为一种新型的综合环境监管工具,融合了控制、市场和合同等要素,自 20 世纪 90 年代末开始在中国试行。该体系在改善环境状况方面的成效及其运行机制备受关注。本研究将试点实施的环境契约作为一个准自然实验,整合了 2003 年至 2014 年中国工业企业的数据和污染统计数据。我们采用多时间点的差分法,对 ECES 对污染减排的影响进行了实证评估。结果表明,ECES 有效抑制了企业的污染排放。异质性分析表明,污染减排效果在国有企业、大型企业以及环境法规严格、公众环境意识高的地区更为明显。机制测试表明,ECES 主要通过缓解融资约束和促进积极的环保行为来减少污染排放。在主动污染预防和末端治理方面,ECES 提供的激励措施对末端治理的影响更为显著。进一步的分析表明,ECES 的具体特点,如强制参与和建立信用等级,尤其有利于提高其减少污染的功效。本研究得出的结论加强了环境和经济奖励计划的微观基础,并为其完善和促进环境与经济目标之间的协同发展提供了有见地的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How the environmental credit evaluation system affects corporate pollution emissions: Evidence from China.

The environmental credit evaluation system (ECES), which integrates control, market, and contractual elements as a novel comprehensive environmental regulation tool, has been piloted in China since the late 1990s. The effectiveness of this system in improving environmental conditions and the mechanisms through which it operates have attracted significant attention. This study utilizes the pilot implementation of the ECES as a quasi-natural experiment, integrating data from Chinese industrial firms and pollution statistics from 2003 to 2014. Employing a difference-in-differences approach with multiple time points, we conduct an empirical assessment of the ECES's impact on pollution reduction. The results indicate that the ECES effectively curtails corporate pollution emissions. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the pollution reduction effects are more pronounced in state-owned firms, large-scale firms, and in regions with stringent environmental regulations and high public environmental awareness. Mechanism testing demonstrates that the ECES mitigates pollution emissions primarily by alleviating financing constraints and promoting positive environmental behaviors. In terms of proactive pollution prevention and end-of-pipe treatment, the latter is more significantly influenced by the incentives provided by the ECES. Further analysis indicates that specific features of the ECES, such as mandatory participation and the establishment of credit ratings, are particularly conducive to enhancing its pollution reduction efficacy. The conclusions drawn from this study reinforce the micro-foundations of the ECES and offer insightful recommendations for its refinement and for promoting synergistic development between environmental and economic objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信