{"title":"高等教育扩张与排放交易计划:中国案例研究。","authors":"Shuyang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the abundant empirical evidence of higher education impacting emission mitigation, few studies have uncovered the mechanism that higher education affects climate policy. In this paper, we attempt to narrow the aforementioned research gap by employing a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to quantify the relations between the higher education expansion (HEE) and emission trading scheme (ETS) in China. The CGE model results show that the HEE reduces labor employment, GDP, and emissions, whereas the ETS relieves these HEE impacts. Regardless of the HEE, the ETS causes emission abatement at the price of employment loss and GDP loss, whereas the HEE weakens the ETS effects on employment, GDP, and emissions. These findings imply that HEE negatively affects emission mitigation in climate policy implementation, whereas climate policy could be implemented to boost economic growth during college education expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"373 ","pages":"123699"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher education expansion and emission trading scheme: A case study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Shuyang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the abundant empirical evidence of higher education impacting emission mitigation, few studies have uncovered the mechanism that higher education affects climate policy. In this paper, we attempt to narrow the aforementioned research gap by employing a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to quantify the relations between the higher education expansion (HEE) and emission trading scheme (ETS) in China. The CGE model results show that the HEE reduces labor employment, GDP, and emissions, whereas the ETS relieves these HEE impacts. Regardless of the HEE, the ETS causes emission abatement at the price of employment loss and GDP loss, whereas the HEE weakens the ETS effects on employment, GDP, and emissions. These findings imply that HEE negatively affects emission mitigation in climate policy implementation, whereas climate policy could be implemented to boost economic growth during college education expansion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"373 \",\"pages\":\"123699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123699\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管有大量实证证据表明高等教育影响减排,但很少有研究揭示高等教育影响气候政策的机制。本文试图缩小上述研究差距,采用可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型量化中国高等教育扩张(HEE)与排放交易计划(ETS)之间的关系。CGE 模型的结果表明,高等教育扩张减少了劳动就业、GDP 和排放,而排放交易计划则缓解了高等教育扩张的影响。无论采用哪种 HEE,排放交易计划都会以就业损失和 GDP 损失为代价减少排放,而 HEE 则会削弱排放交易计划对就业、GDP 和排放的影响。这些发现意味着,在气候政策实施过程中,高等经济教育对减排有负面影响,而在大学教育扩张过程中,气候政策的实施可以促进经济增长。
Higher education expansion and emission trading scheme: A case study in China.
Despite the abundant empirical evidence of higher education impacting emission mitigation, few studies have uncovered the mechanism that higher education affects climate policy. In this paper, we attempt to narrow the aforementioned research gap by employing a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to quantify the relations between the higher education expansion (HEE) and emission trading scheme (ETS) in China. The CGE model results show that the HEE reduces labor employment, GDP, and emissions, whereas the ETS relieves these HEE impacts. Regardless of the HEE, the ETS causes emission abatement at the price of employment loss and GDP loss, whereas the HEE weakens the ETS effects on employment, GDP, and emissions. These findings imply that HEE negatively affects emission mitigation in climate policy implementation, whereas climate policy could be implemented to boost economic growth during college education expansion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.