{"title":"宫腔镜粘连分解术与电外科器械或宫腔镜剪刀在治疗不孕或复发性妊娠失败妇女宫腔内粘连方面的比较。","authors":"Yang Li, Yangzhi Li, Yong Wang, Minzhi Hou, Xing Yan, Dongmei Chen, Yaxiao Chen, Meiqing Xie","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-affiliated hospital.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, finally, a total of 461 subjects were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>HA performed using either an electrosurgical instrument or hysteroscopic scissors.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pregnancy outcomes post-HA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 461 patients were included in the study, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 6 years. The mean age was 29.48 ± 3.25 years. Hysteroscopic scissors demonstrated greater efficiency in restoring the uterine cavity compared to electrosurgical instruments (88.1% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.025). Post-HA, the pregnancy rate was approximately 75.3% (347/461), with a live birth rate of 55.9% (251/449). No significant differences were found between the electrosurgical instrument and hysteroscopic scissors groups regarding improvements in menstrual flow or fertility outcomes (all p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier time-dependent cumulative curves for pregnancy and live birth rates after HA indicated that over 50% of patients achieved pregnancy within one year, with the pregnancy rate plateauing at 2 years and the live birth rate at 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that HA can improve fertility outcomes for patients with RPL or infertility within 2 to 3 years following surgery. Hysteroscopic scissors proved more effective than electrosurgical instruments in restoring the uterine cavity, although no differences were observed between the techniques in terms of menstrual flow or fertility improvements. All in all, our study suggests that standardized HA procedures, the implementation of proactive intraoperative and postoperative measures to prevent the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA), and an active conception plan following HA are key factors in improving reproductive outcomes for these patients with RPL or infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with electrosurgery instrument or hysteroscopic scissors in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions of infertile or recurrent pregnancy loss women.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Li, Yangzhi Li, Yong Wang, Minzhi Hou, Xing Yan, Dongmei Chen, Yaxiao Chen, Meiqing Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-affiliated hospital.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, finally, a total of 461 subjects were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>HA performed using either an electrosurgical instrument or hysteroscopic scissors.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pregnancy outcomes post-HA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 461 patients were included in the study, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 6 years. The mean age was 29.48 ± 3.25 years. Hysteroscopic scissors demonstrated greater efficiency in restoring the uterine cavity compared to electrosurgical instruments (88.1% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.025). Post-HA, the pregnancy rate was approximately 75.3% (347/461), with a live birth rate of 55.9% (251/449). No significant differences were found between the electrosurgical instrument and hysteroscopic scissors groups regarding improvements in menstrual flow or fertility outcomes (all p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier time-dependent cumulative curves for pregnancy and live birth rates after HA indicated that over 50% of patients achieved pregnancy within one year, with the pregnancy rate plateauing at 2 years and the live birth rate at 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that HA can improve fertility outcomes for patients with RPL or infertility within 2 to 3 years following surgery. Hysteroscopic scissors proved more effective than electrosurgical instruments in restoring the uterine cavity, although no differences were observed between the techniques in terms of menstrual flow or fertility improvements. All in all, our study suggests that standardized HA procedures, the implementation of proactive intraoperative and postoperative measures to prevent the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA), and an active conception plan following HA are key factors in improving reproductive outcomes for these patients with RPL or infertility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究复发性妊娠(RPL)或不孕症患者在宫腔镜粘连分解术(HA)后的妊娠结局:研究复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)或不孕症患者在宫腔镜粘连分解术(HA)后的妊娠结局:设计:回顾性队列研究:地点:大学附属医院:根据本研究的纳入和排除标准,最终共纳入 461 名受试者:主要结果指标:HA术后的妊娠结局:结果:研究共纳入461名患者,随访时间为1至6年。平均年龄为(29.48 ± 3.25)岁。与电外科器械相比,宫腔镜剪刀恢复宫腔的效率更高(88.1% 对 80.0%,P = 0.025)。HA后的妊娠率约为75.3%(347/461),活产率为55.9%(251/449)。在改善月经量或生育结果方面,电外科手术器械组和宫腔镜剪刀组之间没有发现明显差异(均 p > 0.05)。HA术后怀孕率和活产率的Kaplan-Meier时间累积曲线显示,超过50%的患者在一年内怀孕,怀孕率在2年后趋于稳定,活产率在3年后趋于稳定:我们的研究结果表明,HA 可以改善 RPL 或不孕症患者术后 2 到 3 年内的生育效果。在恢复宫腔方面,宫腔镜剪刀比电外科器械更有效,但在月经量或生育力改善方面,两种技术之间没有差异。总之,我们的研究表明,标准化的 HA 程序、术中和术后积极预防宫腔内粘连复发的措施以及 HA 术后积极的受孕计划是改善 RPL 或不孕症患者生殖效果的关键因素。
Comparison of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with electrosurgery instrument or hysteroscopic scissors in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions of infertile or recurrent pregnancy loss women.
Objective: To investigate pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: University-affiliated hospital.
Subjects: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, finally, a total of 461 subjects were included.
Interventions: HA performed using either an electrosurgical instrument or hysteroscopic scissors.
Main outcome measures: Pregnancy outcomes post-HA.
Results: A total of 461 patients were included in the study, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 6 years. The mean age was 29.48 ± 3.25 years. Hysteroscopic scissors demonstrated greater efficiency in restoring the uterine cavity compared to electrosurgical instruments (88.1% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.025). Post-HA, the pregnancy rate was approximately 75.3% (347/461), with a live birth rate of 55.9% (251/449). No significant differences were found between the electrosurgical instrument and hysteroscopic scissors groups regarding improvements in menstrual flow or fertility outcomes (all p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier time-dependent cumulative curves for pregnancy and live birth rates after HA indicated that over 50% of patients achieved pregnancy within one year, with the pregnancy rate plateauing at 2 years and the live birth rate at 3 years.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that HA can improve fertility outcomes for patients with RPL or infertility within 2 to 3 years following surgery. Hysteroscopic scissors proved more effective than electrosurgical instruments in restoring the uterine cavity, although no differences were observed between the techniques in terms of menstrual flow or fertility improvements. All in all, our study suggests that standardized HA procedures, the implementation of proactive intraoperative and postoperative measures to prevent the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA), and an active conception plan following HA are key factors in improving reproductive outcomes for these patients with RPL or infertility.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.