冲击波疗法与低染带法治疗足底筋膜炎的比较:一项随机对照研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Fatih Enzin, Ümit Ugurlu
{"title":"冲击波疗法与低染带法治疗足底筋膜炎的比较:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Fatih Enzin, Ümit Ugurlu","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plantar fasciitis is a common musculoskeletal issue that can cause severe pain and limit functionality. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping in relieving pain and improving functionality in plantar fasciitis. The study included cases with a confirmed diagnosis of plantar fasciitis, which were randomly divided into two groups: Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping. The subjects in the Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy group were treated with Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy, while the subjects in the Low-dye taping group were treated with Low-dye taping and sham Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy. Both treatments were administered in three sessions, once a week. Pain and functionality levels were evaluated using the Visual analog scala and Foot&Ankle Outcome Score. Evaluations were conducted pre- and post-treatment, and at the six-week follow-up. Seventy-two subjects completed the study, and at the end of the treatment and follow-up periods, both groups showed a significant decrease in pain levels (p≤0.001) and an increase in functionality levels (p≤0.001) compared to the beginning. However, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding pain and functionality levels at the end of the treatment and follow-up period (p > 0.05). Therefore, both Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping treatments were found to have similar effects in treating plantar fasciitis. These findings can guide clinicians in choosing the most effective conservative treatment for plantar fasciitis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of shock wave therapy and Low-dye tape method in patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Fatih Enzin, Ümit Ugurlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plantar fasciitis is a common musculoskeletal issue that can cause severe pain and limit functionality. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping in relieving pain and improving functionality in plantar fasciitis. The study included cases with a confirmed diagnosis of plantar fasciitis, which were randomly divided into two groups: Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping. The subjects in the Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy group were treated with Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy, while the subjects in the Low-dye taping group were treated with Low-dye taping and sham Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy. Both treatments were administered in three sessions, once a week. Pain and functionality levels were evaluated using the Visual analog scala and Foot&Ankle Outcome Score. Evaluations were conducted pre- and post-treatment, and at the six-week follow-up. Seventy-two subjects completed the study, and at the end of the treatment and follow-up periods, both groups showed a significant decrease in pain levels (p≤0.001) and an increase in functionality levels (p≤0.001) compared to the beginning. However, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding pain and functionality levels at the end of the treatment and follow-up period (p > 0.05). Therefore, both Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping treatments were found to have similar effects in treating plantar fasciitis. These findings can guide clinicians in choosing the most effective conservative treatment for plantar fasciitis patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2024.12.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2024.12.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

足底筋膜炎是一种常见的肌肉骨骼问题,可导致剧烈疼痛并限制功能。本研究旨在比较体外冲击波疗法和低染料绑带疗法在缓解足底筋膜炎疼痛和改善功能方面的效果。研究纳入了确诊为足底筋膜炎的病例,并将其随机分为两组:体外冲击波疗法组和低染料绑带组。体外冲击波疗法组的受试者接受体外冲击波疗法,而低染料绑带组的受试者接受低染料绑带和假体外冲击波疗法。两种疗法均分三次进行,每周一次。采用视觉模拟评分法和足踝结果评分法对疼痛和功能水平进行评估。评估在治疗前、治疗后和六周随访时进行。72名受试者完成了研究,在治疗和随访期结束时,两组受试者的疼痛水平都比开始时有显著下降(p≤0.001),功能水平也有显著提高(p≤0.001)。然而,在治疗结束和随访期间,两组的疼痛和功能水平没有明显差异(p>0.05)。因此,体外冲击波疗法和低染料绑带疗法在治疗足底筋膜炎方面的效果相似。这些发现可以指导临床医生为足底筋膜炎患者选择最有效的保守疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of shock wave therapy and Low-dye tape method in patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled study.

Plantar fasciitis is a common musculoskeletal issue that can cause severe pain and limit functionality. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping in relieving pain and improving functionality in plantar fasciitis. The study included cases with a confirmed diagnosis of plantar fasciitis, which were randomly divided into two groups: Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping. The subjects in the Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy group were treated with Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy, while the subjects in the Low-dye taping group were treated with Low-dye taping and sham Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy. Both treatments were administered in three sessions, once a week. Pain and functionality levels were evaluated using the Visual analog scala and Foot&Ankle Outcome Score. Evaluations were conducted pre- and post-treatment, and at the six-week follow-up. Seventy-two subjects completed the study, and at the end of the treatment and follow-up periods, both groups showed a significant decrease in pain levels (p≤0.001) and an increase in functionality levels (p≤0.001) compared to the beginning. However, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding pain and functionality levels at the end of the treatment and follow-up period (p > 0.05). Therefore, both Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and Low-dye taping treatments were found to have similar effects in treating plantar fasciitis. These findings can guide clinicians in choosing the most effective conservative treatment for plantar fasciitis patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信