IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pauline Norris, Molly George, Vanda Symon, Shirley Keown, Lauralie Richard, Sandhaya Sandy Bhawan, Rosalina Richards
{"title":"Why go back?: Advantages and challenges of longitudinal qualitative research in social pharmacy, and recommendations for social pharmacy researchers.","authors":"Pauline Norris, Molly George, Vanda Symon, Shirley Keown, Lauralie Richard, Sandhaya Sandy Bhawan, Rosalina Richards","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riae072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although most qualitative research is cross-sectional, particularly in social pharmacy/pharmacy practice, there are many advantages of using a longitudinal qualitative research (LQR) design, i.e. re-interviewing participants over a period of time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper describes some advantages and challenges of LQR using our 'Access to Medicines: Exploring Lived Experience to inform policy and programmes' study as an illustration.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Advantages of LQR include obtaining richer and more complete data, providing a greater understanding of change and lack of change, understanding pathways through complex systems, including people facing difficult social circumstances, and contributing to evaluation research. Challenges to be addressed include the implications of developing friendships with participants, deciding whether to assist participants, maintaining participant anonymity, the impact of the research on the researchers, and how to analyse the large volume of data generated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend piloting methods before starting a study, considering the resource implications of LQR, planning the analysis in advance, planning for how to deal with developing friendships with participants, considering threats to participant anonymity, and supporting researchers doing fieldwork.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然大多数定性研究都是横断面研究,尤其是在社会药学/药房实践中,但采用纵向定性研究(LQR)设计,即在一段时间内重新访谈参与者,有很多优势:本文介绍了使用我们的 "药品获取途径 "进行 LQR 的一些优势和挑战:方法:本文以我们的 "获取药品:探索生活经验,为政策和计划提供信息 "研究为例来说明 LQR 的优势和挑战:主要发现:生活质量报告的优势包括:获得更丰富、更完整的数据;更深入地了解变化和缺乏变化的情况;了解通过复杂系统的途径,包括面临困难社会环境的人,以及为评估研究做出贡献。需要应对的挑战包括与参与者建立友谊的影响、决定是否帮助参与者、维护参与者的匿名性、研究对研究人员的影响以及如何分析产生的大量数据:我们建议在开始研究之前先试用各种方法,考虑 LQR 所涉及的资源问题,提前规划分析工作,规划如何处理与参与者建立友谊的问题,考虑对参与者匿名性的威胁,并为开展实地工作的研究人员提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why go back?: Advantages and challenges of longitudinal qualitative research in social pharmacy, and recommendations for social pharmacy researchers.

Objectives: Although most qualitative research is cross-sectional, particularly in social pharmacy/pharmacy practice, there are many advantages of using a longitudinal qualitative research (LQR) design, i.e. re-interviewing participants over a period of time.

Methods: This paper describes some advantages and challenges of LQR using our 'Access to Medicines: Exploring Lived Experience to inform policy and programmes' study as an illustration.

Key findings: Advantages of LQR include obtaining richer and more complete data, providing a greater understanding of change and lack of change, understanding pathways through complex systems, including people facing difficult social circumstances, and contributing to evaluation research. Challenges to be addressed include the implications of developing friendships with participants, deciding whether to assist participants, maintaining participant anonymity, the impact of the research on the researchers, and how to analyse the large volume of data generated.

Conclusions: We recommend piloting methods before starting a study, considering the resource implications of LQR, planning the analysis in advance, planning for how to deal with developing friendships with participants, considering threats to participant anonymity, and supporting researchers doing fieldwork.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信