Zhanhui Ou, Nengqing Liu, Ang Chen, Qingni Li, Jieliang Li, Xiaojun Wen, Junye Huo, Xiaowu Fang, Jing Du, Xiufeng Lin
{"title":"植入前非整倍体基因检测对高龄育龄妇女胚胎移植结果的影响(取回卵母细胞不超过三个)。","authors":"Zhanhui Ou, Nengqing Liu, Ang Chen, Qingni Li, Jieliang Li, Xiaojun Wen, Junye Huo, Xiaowu Fang, Jing Du, Xiufeng Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) benefits women of advanced reproductive age (≥38 years old) with a diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; not more than three retrieved oocytes).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective analysis comparing two groups: (a) PGT-A group: women who chose PGT-A and subsequent single re-warmed embryo transfers (ETs) and (b) non-PGT-A group: women who chose not to genetically test their embryos and underwent subsequent fresh or re-warmed ETs of one to two embryos on days 3 or 5.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Two hundred and thirty patients underwent PGT-A therapy, with 49 of these individuals undergoing more than one PGT-A cycle. Meanwhile, 309 patients received non-PGT-A treatment, among whom 89 underwent more than one cycle of this type. Collectively, this study encompassed a total of 298 PGT-A cycles and 429 non-PGT-A cycles from a single center (April 2019-June 2023). All women had a DOR and advanced reproductive age.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The exposure variable was the use of PGT-A.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was live birth rates (per cycle and retrieval). Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rates (per cycle and retrieval), miscarriage rates (per pregnancy and retrieval).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While PGT-A cycles had lower transfer rates (14.1% vs. 73.2%), they achieved significantly higher pregnancy (66.7% vs. 12.4%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 11.474; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.462, 24.102; p < 0.001) and live birth rates (57.1% vs. 7.5%) per transfer (aOR = 13.065; 95% CI, 5.987, 28.510; p < 0.001). The PGT-A group also had lower miscarriage rates (14.3% vs. 40.0%) (aOR = 0.142; 95% CI, 0.030, 0.661; p = 0.013). However, overall pregnancy and live birth rates were similar, and the PGT-A group required fewer cycles for live birth (p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While PGT-A improved clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per transfer cycle in women of advanced reproductive age with a low oocyte yield, it did not impact these rates per retrieval.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on embryo transfer outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age with no more than three retrieved oocytes.\",\"authors\":\"Zhanhui Ou, Nengqing Liu, Ang Chen, Qingni Li, Jieliang Li, Xiaojun Wen, Junye Huo, Xiaowu Fang, Jing Du, Xiufeng Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) benefits women of advanced reproductive age (≥38 years old) with a diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; not more than three retrieved oocytes).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective analysis comparing two groups: (a) PGT-A group: women who chose PGT-A and subsequent single re-warmed embryo transfers (ETs) and (b) non-PGT-A group: women who chose not to genetically test their embryos and underwent subsequent fresh or re-warmed ETs of one to two embryos on days 3 or 5.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Two hundred and thirty patients underwent PGT-A therapy, with 49 of these individuals undergoing more than one PGT-A cycle. Meanwhile, 309 patients received non-PGT-A treatment, among whom 89 underwent more than one cycle of this type. Collectively, this study encompassed a total of 298 PGT-A cycles and 429 non-PGT-A cycles from a single center (April 2019-June 2023). All women had a DOR and advanced reproductive age.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The exposure variable was the use of PGT-A.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was live birth rates (per cycle and retrieval). Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rates (per cycle and retrieval), miscarriage rates (per pregnancy and retrieval).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While PGT-A cycles had lower transfer rates (14.1% vs. 73.2%), they achieved significantly higher pregnancy (66.7% vs. 12.4%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 11.474; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.462, 24.102; p < 0.001) and live birth rates (57.1% vs. 7.5%) per transfer (aOR = 13.065; 95% CI, 5.987, 28.510; p < 0.001). The PGT-A group also had lower miscarriage rates (14.3% vs. 40.0%) (aOR = 0.142; 95% CI, 0.030, 0.661; p = 0.013). However, overall pregnancy and live birth rates were similar, and the PGT-A group required fewer cycles for live birth (p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While PGT-A improved clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per transfer cycle in women of advanced reproductive age with a low oocyte yield, it did not impact these rates per retrieval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on embryo transfer outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age with no more than three retrieved oocytes.
Objective: To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) benefits women of advanced reproductive age (≥38 years old) with a diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; not more than three retrieved oocytes).
Design: A retrospective analysis comparing two groups: (a) PGT-A group: women who chose PGT-A and subsequent single re-warmed embryo transfers (ETs) and (b) non-PGT-A group: women who chose not to genetically test their embryos and underwent subsequent fresh or re-warmed ETs of one to two embryos on days 3 or 5.
Subjects: Two hundred and thirty patients underwent PGT-A therapy, with 49 of these individuals undergoing more than one PGT-A cycle. Meanwhile, 309 patients received non-PGT-A treatment, among whom 89 underwent more than one cycle of this type. Collectively, this study encompassed a total of 298 PGT-A cycles and 429 non-PGT-A cycles from a single center (April 2019-June 2023). All women had a DOR and advanced reproductive age.
Exposure: The exposure variable was the use of PGT-A.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was live birth rates (per cycle and retrieval). Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rates (per cycle and retrieval), miscarriage rates (per pregnancy and retrieval).
Results: While PGT-A cycles had lower transfer rates (14.1% vs. 73.2%), they achieved significantly higher pregnancy (66.7% vs. 12.4%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 11.474; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.462, 24.102; p < 0.001) and live birth rates (57.1% vs. 7.5%) per transfer (aOR = 13.065; 95% CI, 5.987, 28.510; p < 0.001). The PGT-A group also had lower miscarriage rates (14.3% vs. 40.0%) (aOR = 0.142; 95% CI, 0.030, 0.661; p = 0.013). However, overall pregnancy and live birth rates were similar, and the PGT-A group required fewer cycles for live birth (p = 0.023).
Conclusion: While PGT-A improved clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per transfer cycle in women of advanced reproductive age with a low oocyte yield, it did not impact these rates per retrieval.
期刊介绍:
Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.