心境良好的双相情感障碍患者情绪反应的情感调节。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Nilgun Oktar Erdogan , Cagrı Mesut Temucin , Koray Başar , Zumrut Duygu Sen , Suzan Ozer
{"title":"心境良好的双相情感障碍患者情绪反应的情感调节。","authors":"Nilgun Oktar Erdogan ,&nbsp;Cagrı Mesut Temucin ,&nbsp;Koray Başar ,&nbsp;Zumrut Duygu Sen ,&nbsp;Suzan Ozer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Affective modulation of startle reflex (AMSR) is a widely used experimental tool for assessing emotional reactivity. Previous research has shown inconsistent findings of emotional reactivity in amplitude in bipolar patients (BP). This study examined emotional reactivity (ER) in euthymic BP compared to healthy controls using both subjective and objective measures.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This study compared ER between 33 euthymic BP (I and II) and 35 healthy controls. Subjective experiences, valence, and arousal scores were assessed using the Self-Assessment Manikin. Objective measures included startle reflex parameters - amplitude, area, and latency - from the orbicularis oculi muscle via electromyography. To assess the AMSR, pictures of varying emotional valences from the International Affective Picture System were used during acoustic stimulation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A significant picture category effect was observed in the subjective picture evaluation; however, no substantial group effect or picture category-group interaction was detected. In the controls, picture categories exerted a significant effect on amplitude, but did not in euthymic BP. A linear pattern of startle amplitude across different picture categories was evident in the control group but not in patients. Analyses of the area did not reveal significant group differences. Onset latency was also similar between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study indicates impaired emotional processing in euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder, as shown by altered startle reflex measurements. Future research with larger samples and consideration of bipolar disorder subtypes is needed to explore these findings further.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 112487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affective modulation of emotional reactivity in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder\",\"authors\":\"Nilgun Oktar Erdogan ,&nbsp;Cagrı Mesut Temucin ,&nbsp;Koray Başar ,&nbsp;Zumrut Duygu Sen ,&nbsp;Suzan Ozer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Affective modulation of startle reflex (AMSR) is a widely used experimental tool for assessing emotional reactivity. Previous research has shown inconsistent findings of emotional reactivity in amplitude in bipolar patients (BP). This study examined emotional reactivity (ER) in euthymic BP compared to healthy controls using both subjective and objective measures.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This study compared ER between 33 euthymic BP (I and II) and 35 healthy controls. Subjective experiences, valence, and arousal scores were assessed using the Self-Assessment Manikin. Objective measures included startle reflex parameters - amplitude, area, and latency - from the orbicularis oculi muscle via electromyography. To assess the AMSR, pictures of varying emotional valences from the International Affective Picture System were used during acoustic stimulation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A significant picture category effect was observed in the subjective picture evaluation; however, no substantial group effect or picture category-group interaction was detected. In the controls, picture categories exerted a significant effect on amplitude, but did not in euthymic BP. A linear pattern of startle amplitude across different picture categories was evident in the control group but not in patients. Analyses of the area did not reveal significant group differences. Onset latency was also similar between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study indicates impaired emotional processing in euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder, as shown by altered startle reflex measurements. Future research with larger samples and consideration of bipolar disorder subtypes is needed to explore these findings further.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024001910\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024001910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:惊吓反射的情感调节(AMSR)是一种被广泛应用于评估情绪反应的实验工具。以往的研究表明,双相情感障碍患者情绪反应的幅度不一致。本研究采用主观和客观的测量方法,比较了与健康对照者相比的情绪反应性(ER)。方法:比较33例正常血压(I和II)与35例健康对照者的ER。主观体验、效价和觉醒分数使用自我评估模型进行评估。客观测量包括惊反射参数-振幅,面积和潜伏期-通过肌电图从眼轮匝肌。为了评估AMSR,在声刺激期间使用了来自国际情感图像系统的不同情绪值的图像。结果:主观图片评价存在显著的图片类别效应;然而,没有发现实质性的群体效应或图片类别-群体相互作用。在对照组中,图片类别对振幅有显著影响,但对生理血压无显著影响。在对照组中,不同图片类别的惊吓幅度呈明显的线性模式,而在患者中则没有。对该区域的分析并没有显示出显著的群体差异。两组间发病潜伏期相似。结论:本研究表明,从惊吓反射测量的改变来看,双相情感障碍患者的情绪加工受损。未来的研究需要更大的样本和双相情感障碍亚型的考虑来进一步探索这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Affective modulation of emotional reactivity in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

Background

Affective modulation of startle reflex (AMSR) is a widely used experimental tool for assessing emotional reactivity. Previous research has shown inconsistent findings of emotional reactivity in amplitude in bipolar patients (BP). This study examined emotional reactivity (ER) in euthymic BP compared to healthy controls using both subjective and objective measures.

Method

This study compared ER between 33 euthymic BP (I and II) and 35 healthy controls. Subjective experiences, valence, and arousal scores were assessed using the Self-Assessment Manikin. Objective measures included startle reflex parameters - amplitude, area, and latency - from the orbicularis oculi muscle via electromyography. To assess the AMSR, pictures of varying emotional valences from the International Affective Picture System were used during acoustic stimulation.

Results

A significant picture category effect was observed in the subjective picture evaluation; however, no substantial group effect or picture category-group interaction was detected. In the controls, picture categories exerted a significant effect on amplitude, but did not in euthymic BP. A linear pattern of startle amplitude across different picture categories was evident in the control group but not in patients. Analyses of the area did not reveal significant group differences. Onset latency was also similar between groups.

Conclusion

This study indicates impaired emotional processing in euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder, as shown by altered startle reflex measurements. Future research with larger samples and consideration of bipolar disorder subtypes is needed to explore these findings further.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信