药学院研究生和博士后的首选教育规划：一项试点调查。

IF 3.8 4区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101342

Natalie S. Hohmann , Taylor L. Watterson , Chenyu Zou , Theresa Filtz , Ana M. Castejon , Terri L. Warholak , Peter M. Gannett , Marie Barnard

{"title":"药学院研究生和博士后的首选教育规划：一项试点调查。","authors":"Natalie S. Hohmann , Taylor L. Watterson , Chenyu Zou , Theresa Filtz , Ana M. Castejon , Terri L. Warholak , Peter M. Gannett , Marie Barnard","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To inform program development, the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Graduate Education Special Interest Group Colleagues in Training Committee (CITC) investigated the professional development needs of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows at schools/colleges of pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional pilot survey examined preferred programming topics, mentoring needs, and career goals. A survey invitation was posted on AACP Connect and emailed to Graduate Program Officers and Assistant/Associate Deans for Research at US pharmacy schools/colleges for distribution to trainees. Eligible respondents were trainees in Master’s, PhD, or postdoctoral programs at US schools/colleges of pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 108 responses were analyzed. Most respondents were White (51%) or Asian (34%), 4% African American or Black, and 3% Hispanic/Latino(a). Most were female (58%), with a mean age of 30 years (SD = 6.05 years). Overall, 55% were domestic and 41% international. The majority were PhD students (84%) in Basic Sciences (60%) or Economic, Social, and Administrative Sciences (ESAS, 24%). Preferred programming topics included: an overview of career options (72%), how to get a job in pharmaceutical/biotech companies (67%), and resume/CV development (65%). There were significant differences in preferred programming topics between international and domestic trainees. Only 17% had a written mentorship contract with their major advisor. Overall, 44% planned careers in pharmaceutical/biotech companies, 27% in academia, and 10% in government agencies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Future programming may prioritize strategies for graduate students/postdoctoral fellows to decide what career is the right fit and develop job application materials. Results are relevant for AACP programming and graduate school curricula, as well as implementing individualized development programs targeting essential soft skills training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 2","pages":"Article 101342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferred Educational Programming Among Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Fellows at Pharmacy Schools: A Pilot Survey\",\"authors\":\"Natalie S. Hohmann , Taylor L. Watterson , Chenyu Zou , Theresa Filtz , Ana M. Castejon , Terri L. Warholak , Peter M. Gannett , Marie Barnard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To inform program development, the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Graduate Education Special Interest Group Colleagues in Training Committee (CITC) investigated the professional development needs of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows at schools/colleges of pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional pilot survey examined preferred programming topics, mentoring needs, and career goals. A survey invitation was posted on AACP Connect and emailed to Graduate Program Officers and Assistant/Associate Deans for Research at US pharmacy schools/colleges for distribution to trainees. Eligible respondents were trainees in Master’s, PhD, or postdoctoral programs at US schools/colleges of pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 108 responses were analyzed. Most respondents were White (51%) or Asian (34%), 4% African American or Black, and 3% Hispanic/Latino(a). Most were female (58%), with a mean age of 30 years (SD = 6.05 years). Overall, 55% were domestic and 41% international. The majority were PhD students (84%) in Basic Sciences (60%) or Economic, Social, and Administrative Sciences (ESAS, 24%). Preferred programming topics included: an overview of career options (72%), how to get a job in pharmaceutical/biotech companies (67%), and resume/CV development (65%). There were significant differences in preferred programming topics between international and domestic trainees. Only 17% had a written mentorship contract with their major advisor. Overall, 44% planned careers in pharmaceutical/biotech companies, 27% in academia, and 10% in government agencies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Future programming may prioritize strategies for graduate students/postdoctoral fellows to decide what career is the right fit and develop job application materials. Results are relevant for AACP programming and graduate school curricula, as well as implementing individualized development programs targeting essential soft skills training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110613\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：为了给项目开发提供信息，AACP 研究生教育特别兴趣小组培训同事委员会 (CITC) 调查了药学院/大学的研究生和博士后研究员的职业发展需求：一项横向试点调查研究了首选的课程主题、指导需求和职业目标。调查邀请函发布在 AACP Connect 上，并通过电子邮件发送给美国药学院/大学的研究生项目官员和研究助理/副院长，以便分发给学员。符合条件的受访者为美国药学院/大学的硕士、博士或博士后项目学员：共分析了 108 份回复。大多数受访者为白人（51%）或亚裔（34%），4%为非裔美国人或黑人，3%为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人(a)。大多数为女性（58%），平均年龄为 30 岁（SD=6.05 岁）。55%为国内学生，41%为国际学生。大多数是基础科学（60%）或经济、社会和行政科学（ESAS，24%）专业的博士生（84%）。首选的课程主题包括：职业选择概述（72%）、如何在制药/生物技术公司就业（67%）和简历/履历发展（65%）。国际受训人员和国内受训人员在首选课程主题方面存在明显差异。只有 17% 的学员与他们的专业导师签订了书面导师合同。44%的学员计划在制药/生物技术公司就业，27%计划在学术界就业，10%计划在政府机构就业：结论：未来的计划可能会优先考虑研究生/博士后研究员的战略，以便他们决定适合自己的职业并编制求职申请材料。研究结果与AACP计划和研究生院课程相关，也与实施针对基本软技能培训的个性化发展计划相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Preferred Educational Programming Among Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Fellows at Pharmacy Schools: A Pilot Survey

Objective

To inform program development, the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Graduate Education Special Interest Group Colleagues in Training Committee (CITC) investigated the professional development needs of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows at schools/colleges of pharmacy.

Methods

A cross-sectional pilot survey examined preferred programming topics, mentoring needs, and career goals. A survey invitation was posted on AACP Connect and emailed to Graduate Program Officers and Assistant/Associate Deans for Research at US pharmacy schools/colleges for distribution to trainees. Eligible respondents were trainees in Master’s, PhD, or postdoctoral programs at US schools/colleges of pharmacy.

Results

A total of 108 responses were analyzed. Most respondents were White (51%) or Asian (34%), 4% African American or Black, and 3% Hispanic/Latino(a). Most were female (58%), with a mean age of 30 years (SD = 6.05 years). Overall, 55% were domestic and 41% international. The majority were PhD students (84%) in Basic Sciences (60%) or Economic, Social, and Administrative Sciences (ESAS, 24%). Preferred programming topics included: an overview of career options (72%), how to get a job in pharmaceutical/biotech companies (67%), and resume/CV development (65%). There were significant differences in preferred programming topics between international and domestic trainees. Only 17% had a written mentorship contract with their major advisor. Overall, 44% planned careers in pharmaceutical/biotech companies, 27% in academia, and 10% in government agencies.

Conclusion

Future programming may prioritize strategies for graduate students/postdoctoral fellows to decide what career is the right fit and develop job application materials. Results are relevant for AACP programming and graduate school curricula, as well as implementing individualized development programs targeting essential soft skills training.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 医学-学科教育

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

15.20%

发文量

114

期刊介绍： The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.