Ricardo A Wilhelm, Breanna A McNaughton, Mara J Demuth, Danielle Bethel, Lizbeth Rojas, Nicole Baughman, Eric Mann, Glenna P Stumblingbear-Riddle, Terrence K Kominsky, Robin L Aupperle, Martin P Paulus, Jennifer L Stewart, Evan J White
{"title":"社会支持、灵性和执行功能:美国印第安人(AIs)文化保护因素的神经机制事件相关电位(ERP)研究。","authors":"Ricardo A Wilhelm, Breanna A McNaughton, Mara J Demuth, Danielle Bethel, Lizbeth Rojas, Nicole Baughman, Eric Mann, Glenna P Stumblingbear-Riddle, Terrence K Kominsky, Robin L Aupperle, Martin P Paulus, Jennifer L Stewart, Evan J White","doi":"10.1037/amp0001450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A resilience-based approach in American Indian (AI) communities focuses on inherent sociocultural assets that may act as protective resilience buffers linked to mitigated mental health risks (e.g., deep-rooted spiritual, robust social support networks). Executive control functions are implicated as mechanisms for protective factors, but little evidence exists on the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms that support resilience. This study examined how sustainable and community-centric factors of social support and Native Spirituality were linked to neural mechanisms of executive control functions in a heterogeneous AI community. Fifty-nine self-identified AI participants underwent electroencephalography recordings during a stop signal task and completed measures of social support and spirituality engagement. Event-related potential components indexed attentional resource allocation for inhibitory processing (N2, P3a) and for response error monitoring (error/correct-related negativity; error positivity). Greater social support was linked to attenuated attentional demands for early and sustained inhibitory processing (N2, P3a). Greater Native Spirituality beliefs were linked to greater attentional resources for early but not sustained error-monitoring error-related negativity. Results provide novel evidence for neurocognitive mechanisms of resilience, contribute a deeper understanding of resilience within Indigenous communities, and highlight the role of salient protective factors in mental health that offer a foundation for targeted resilience-based treatment(s). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social support, spirituality, and executive functions: An event-related potential (ERP) study of neural mechanisms of cultural protective factors in American Indians (AIs).\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo A Wilhelm, Breanna A McNaughton, Mara J Demuth, Danielle Bethel, Lizbeth Rojas, Nicole Baughman, Eric Mann, Glenna P Stumblingbear-Riddle, Terrence K Kominsky, Robin L Aupperle, Martin P Paulus, Jennifer L Stewart, Evan J White\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A resilience-based approach in American Indian (AI) communities focuses on inherent sociocultural assets that may act as protective resilience buffers linked to mitigated mental health risks (e.g., deep-rooted spiritual, robust social support networks). Executive control functions are implicated as mechanisms for protective factors, but little evidence exists on the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms that support resilience. This study examined how sustainable and community-centric factors of social support and Native Spirituality were linked to neural mechanisms of executive control functions in a heterogeneous AI community. Fifty-nine self-identified AI participants underwent electroencephalography recordings during a stop signal task and completed measures of social support and spirituality engagement. Event-related potential components indexed attentional resource allocation for inhibitory processing (N2, P3a) and for response error monitoring (error/correct-related negativity; error positivity). Greater social support was linked to attenuated attentional demands for early and sustained inhibitory processing (N2, P3a). Greater Native Spirituality beliefs were linked to greater attentional resources for early but not sustained error-monitoring error-related negativity. Results provide novel evidence for neurocognitive mechanisms of resilience, contribute a deeper understanding of resilience within Indigenous communities, and highlight the role of salient protective factors in mental health that offer a foundation for targeted resilience-based treatment(s). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Psychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001450\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001450","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在美国印第安人(AI)社区中,以恢复力为基础的方法侧重于固有的社会文化资产,这些资产可作为与减轻心理健康风险相关的保护性恢复力缓冲器(如根深蒂固的精神、强大的社会支持网络)。执行控制功能被认为是保护性因素的机制,但有关支持复原力的潜在神经认知机制的证据却很少。本研究考察了在一个异质的人工智能社区中,社会支持和本土精神等以社区为中心的可持续因素是如何与执行控制功能的神经机制联系在一起的。59 名自我认同的人工智能参与者在执行停止信号任务时接受了脑电图记录,并完成了社会支持和精神参与的测量。事件相关电位成分反映了抑制处理(N2、P3a)和反应错误监测(错误/纠正相关负性;错误正性)的注意力资源分配情况。更多的社会支持与早期和持续抑制处理的注意力需求减弱有关(N2、P3a)。更多的原住民精神信仰与更多的早期错误监控注意资源有关,但与持续的错误相关负性无关。研究结果为复原力的神经认知机制提供了新的证据,有助于加深对土著社区复原力的理解,并强调了心理健康中突出的保护因素的作用,为基于复原力的针对性治疗奠定了基础。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
Social support, spirituality, and executive functions: An event-related potential (ERP) study of neural mechanisms of cultural protective factors in American Indians (AIs).
A resilience-based approach in American Indian (AI) communities focuses on inherent sociocultural assets that may act as protective resilience buffers linked to mitigated mental health risks (e.g., deep-rooted spiritual, robust social support networks). Executive control functions are implicated as mechanisms for protective factors, but little evidence exists on the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms that support resilience. This study examined how sustainable and community-centric factors of social support and Native Spirituality were linked to neural mechanisms of executive control functions in a heterogeneous AI community. Fifty-nine self-identified AI participants underwent electroencephalography recordings during a stop signal task and completed measures of social support and spirituality engagement. Event-related potential components indexed attentional resource allocation for inhibitory processing (N2, P3a) and for response error monitoring (error/correct-related negativity; error positivity). Greater social support was linked to attenuated attentional demands for early and sustained inhibitory processing (N2, P3a). Greater Native Spirituality beliefs were linked to greater attentional resources for early but not sustained error-monitoring error-related negativity. Results provide novel evidence for neurocognitive mechanisms of resilience, contribute a deeper understanding of resilience within Indigenous communities, and highlight the role of salient protective factors in mental health that offer a foundation for targeted resilience-based treatment(s). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.