Marius M. Hoeper , Stephan Rosenkranz , David B. Badesch , Marc Humbert , David Langleben , John W. McConnell , Sara Hegab , Claudia Rahner , Jean-François Richard , Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani
{"title":"治疗肺动脉高压的 Riociguat:4-strata COMPERA 2.0 风险评估工具在 PATENT 研究中的应用。","authors":"Marius M. Hoeper , Stephan Rosenkranz , David B. Badesch , Marc Humbert , David Langleben , John W. McConnell , Sara Hegab , Claudia Rahner , Jean-François Richard , Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Risk stratification is an essential part of evaluating disease severity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study applied the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk model to the Phase 3 PATENT-1/2 studies of riociguat.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a post hoc analysis of PATENT-1 and PATENT-2. Log-rank tests of Kaplan–Meier curves were performed to compare the risk strata at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 regarding time to clinical worsening and survival at 2 years in the PATENT-2 population.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data on COMPERA 2.0 status at baseline were available for 214 patients with riociguat and 100 with placebo; overall, 120 patients were identified as intermediate-low risk and 96 as intermediate-high risk. At PATENT-1 Week 12, improvements in COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and median 6-min walk distance were seen with riociguat vs placebo in patients assessed as intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk at baseline by COMPERA 2.0. More patients improved their COMPERA 2.0 risk status with riociguat vs placebo in the intermediate-low (38 % vs 22 %) and intermediate-high risk groups (42 % vs 31 %). COMPERA 2.0 assessed at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 discriminated between risk strata for survival and clinical worsening in PATENT-2 at 2 years (<em>p</em> ≤ .001 for all analyses).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, this analysis supports the risk-reduction benefits of riociguat in patients with PAH at intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk, and externally validated the utility of COMPERA 2.0 in the long-term risk assessment of patients from a clinical trial population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107910"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Riociguat in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Application of the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk assessment tool in the PATENT studies\",\"authors\":\"Marius M. Hoeper , Stephan Rosenkranz , David B. Badesch , Marc Humbert , David Langleben , John W. McConnell , Sara Hegab , Claudia Rahner , Jean-François Richard , Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Risk stratification is an essential part of evaluating disease severity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study applied the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk model to the Phase 3 PATENT-1/2 studies of riociguat.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a post hoc analysis of PATENT-1 and PATENT-2. Log-rank tests of Kaplan–Meier curves were performed to compare the risk strata at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 regarding time to clinical worsening and survival at 2 years in the PATENT-2 population.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data on COMPERA 2.0 status at baseline were available for 214 patients with riociguat and 100 with placebo; overall, 120 patients were identified as intermediate-low risk and 96 as intermediate-high risk. At PATENT-1 Week 12, improvements in COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and median 6-min walk distance were seen with riociguat vs placebo in patients assessed as intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk at baseline by COMPERA 2.0. More patients improved their COMPERA 2.0 risk status with riociguat vs placebo in the intermediate-low (38 % vs 22 %) and intermediate-high risk groups (42 % vs 31 %). COMPERA 2.0 assessed at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 discriminated between risk strata for survival and clinical worsening in PATENT-2 at 2 years (<em>p</em> ≤ .001 for all analyses).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, this analysis supports the risk-reduction benefits of riociguat in patients with PAH at intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk, and externally validated the utility of COMPERA 2.0 in the long-term risk assessment of patients from a clinical trial population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003858\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Riociguat in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Application of the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk assessment tool in the PATENT studies
Background
Risk stratification is an essential part of evaluating disease severity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study applied the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk model to the Phase 3 PATENT-1/2 studies of riociguat.
Methods
This was a post hoc analysis of PATENT-1 and PATENT-2. Log-rank tests of Kaplan–Meier curves were performed to compare the risk strata at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 regarding time to clinical worsening and survival at 2 years in the PATENT-2 population.
Results
Data on COMPERA 2.0 status at baseline were available for 214 patients with riociguat and 100 with placebo; overall, 120 patients were identified as intermediate-low risk and 96 as intermediate-high risk. At PATENT-1 Week 12, improvements in COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and median 6-min walk distance were seen with riociguat vs placebo in patients assessed as intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk at baseline by COMPERA 2.0. More patients improved their COMPERA 2.0 risk status with riociguat vs placebo in the intermediate-low (38 % vs 22 %) and intermediate-high risk groups (42 % vs 31 %). COMPERA 2.0 assessed at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 discriminated between risk strata for survival and clinical worsening in PATENT-2 at 2 years (p ≤ .001 for all analyses).
Conclusions
In conclusion, this analysis supports the risk-reduction benefits of riociguat in patients with PAH at intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk, and externally validated the utility of COMPERA 2.0 in the long-term risk assessment of patients from a clinical trial population.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.