泰国老年人的心理健康模式:比较居家养老群体和老年移民群体。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0311284
Arunya Tuicomepee, Juthatip Wiwattanapantuwong, Panrapee Suttiwan, Rewadee Watakakosol, Sompoch Iamsupasit, Phummaret Phupha
{"title":"泰国老年人的心理健康模式:比较居家养老群体和老年移民群体。","authors":"Arunya Tuicomepee, Juthatip Wiwattanapantuwong, Panrapee Suttiwan, Rewadee Watakakosol, Sompoch Iamsupasit, Phummaret Phupha","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0311284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although aging well and aging in place policies have been encouraged in many countries, a consistent challenge is insufficient evidence on older migrants. This study compared mental well-being models of older adults between aging in place and aging migrant groups. The model included social factors (e.g., social well-being) and personal factors (e.g., cognitive function and psychological distress).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 334 Thais (187 aging in place, 147 aging migrants). Their mean age was 69.79 ± 7.28 years old. All met the selection criteria: age 60 years or over, voluntary participation, and ability to visit the community area for study participation. Instruments were The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS), 21-item Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale, 15-item Social Well-Being Scale, and 5-item WHO Well-being Index. Data were collected in the five regions of Thailand from March 2021 to February 2022. Local psychologists and research assistants assessed and interviewed the participants. Maximum likelihood with the Satorra-Bentler correction was used for parameter estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both models fit the empirical data. The multi-group model estimation yielded a difference between the models. The factors of the aging in place group that were associated with mental well-being were psychological distress (SE = 0.08, p < .001) and cognitive function (SE = 0.07, p < .001), but not social well-being (SE = 0.09, ns). For the migrant group, psychological distress (SE = 0.12, p < .01) and social well-being (SE = 0.11, p < .001) were significant predictors of mental well-being, but not of cognitive function (SE = 0.12, ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By understanding differences in the mental well-being models between the two groups, policy makers and service providers can better address the needs of older adults. Policies and programs should be designed to reduce their psychological distress. Maintaining social connections can be crucial for migrants, while activities such as lifelong learning and physical activities to enhance cognitive function can benefit people who are aging in place.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0311284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental well-being model of Thai older adults: Comparing the aging in place and aging migrant groups.\",\"authors\":\"Arunya Tuicomepee, Juthatip Wiwattanapantuwong, Panrapee Suttiwan, Rewadee Watakakosol, Sompoch Iamsupasit, Phummaret Phupha\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0311284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although aging well and aging in place policies have been encouraged in many countries, a consistent challenge is insufficient evidence on older migrants. This study compared mental well-being models of older adults between aging in place and aging migrant groups. The model included social factors (e.g., social well-being) and personal factors (e.g., cognitive function and psychological distress).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 334 Thais (187 aging in place, 147 aging migrants). Their mean age was 69.79 ± 7.28 years old. All met the selection criteria: age 60 years or over, voluntary participation, and ability to visit the community area for study participation. Instruments were The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS), 21-item Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale, 15-item Social Well-Being Scale, and 5-item WHO Well-being Index. Data were collected in the five regions of Thailand from March 2021 to February 2022. Local psychologists and research assistants assessed and interviewed the participants. Maximum likelihood with the Satorra-Bentler correction was used for parameter estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both models fit the empirical data. The multi-group model estimation yielded a difference between the models. The factors of the aging in place group that were associated with mental well-being were psychological distress (SE = 0.08, p < .001) and cognitive function (SE = 0.07, p < .001), but not social well-being (SE = 0.09, ns). For the migrant group, psychological distress (SE = 0.12, p < .01) and social well-being (SE = 0.11, p < .001) were significant predictors of mental well-being, but not of cognitive function (SE = 0.12, ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By understanding differences in the mental well-being models between the two groups, policy makers and service providers can better address the needs of older adults. Policies and programs should be designed to reduce their psychological distress. Maintaining social connections can be crucial for migrants, while activities such as lifelong learning and physical activities to enhance cognitive function can benefit people who are aging in place.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"e0311284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311284\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管许多国家都鼓励老有所养和居家养老政策,但始终面临的一个挑战是有关老年移民的证据不足。本研究比较了居家养老和老年移民群体的老年人心理健康模型。该模型包括社会因素(如社会福利)和个人因素(如认知功能和心理困扰):参与者为 334 名泰国人(187 名居家养老者和 147 名老年移民)。他们的平均年龄为 69.79 ± 7.28 岁。所有参与者均符合选择标准:年龄在 60 岁或以上、自愿参与、能够前往社区参与研究。研究工具包括改良版迷你精神状态量表(3MS)、21 项抑郁、焦虑、压力量表、15 项社会幸福感量表和 5 项世界卫生组织幸福指数。数据收集工作于 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 2 月在泰国五个地区进行。当地心理学家和研究助理对参与者进行了评估和访谈。采用最大似然法和萨托拉-本特勒修正法进行参数估计:结果:两个模型都符合经验数据。多组模型估计结果显示,两个模型之间存在差异。居家养老组中与心理健康相关的因素是心理困扰(SE = 0.08,p < .001)和认知功能(SE = 0.07,p < .001),但与社会幸福感无关(SE = 0.09,ns)。就移民群体而言,心理困扰(SE = 0.12,p < .01)和社会幸福感(SE = 0.11,p < .001)对心理幸福感有显著的预测作用,但对认知功能(SE = 0.12,ns)没有显著的预测作用:通过了解两个群体在心理健康模式上的差异,政策制定者和服务提供者可以更好地满足老年人的需求。政策和项目的设计应减少老年人的心理困扰。保持社会联系对移民来说至关重要,而终身学习和体育活动等提高认知功能的活动则能让居家养老的人受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mental well-being model of Thai older adults: Comparing the aging in place and aging migrant groups.

Mental well-being model of Thai older adults: Comparing the aging in place and aging migrant groups.

Mental well-being model of Thai older adults: Comparing the aging in place and aging migrant groups.

Mental well-being model of Thai older adults: Comparing the aging in place and aging migrant groups.

Objective: Although aging well and aging in place policies have been encouraged in many countries, a consistent challenge is insufficient evidence on older migrants. This study compared mental well-being models of older adults between aging in place and aging migrant groups. The model included social factors (e.g., social well-being) and personal factors (e.g., cognitive function and psychological distress).

Methods: Participants were 334 Thais (187 aging in place, 147 aging migrants). Their mean age was 69.79 ± 7.28 years old. All met the selection criteria: age 60 years or over, voluntary participation, and ability to visit the community area for study participation. Instruments were The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS), 21-item Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale, 15-item Social Well-Being Scale, and 5-item WHO Well-being Index. Data were collected in the five regions of Thailand from March 2021 to February 2022. Local psychologists and research assistants assessed and interviewed the participants. Maximum likelihood with the Satorra-Bentler correction was used for parameter estimation.

Results: Both models fit the empirical data. The multi-group model estimation yielded a difference between the models. The factors of the aging in place group that were associated with mental well-being were psychological distress (SE = 0.08, p < .001) and cognitive function (SE = 0.07, p < .001), but not social well-being (SE = 0.09, ns). For the migrant group, psychological distress (SE = 0.12, p < .01) and social well-being (SE = 0.11, p < .001) were significant predictors of mental well-being, but not of cognitive function (SE = 0.12, ns).

Conclusions: By understanding differences in the mental well-being models between the two groups, policy makers and service providers can better address the needs of older adults. Policies and programs should be designed to reduce their psychological distress. Maintaining social connections can be crucial for migrants, while activities such as lifelong learning and physical activities to enhance cognitive function can benefit people who are aging in place.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信