Cara Drake, Katherine Starcevich, Olivia Wackowski, Stefanie K Gratale, Ollie Ganz, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Jennifer L Pearson
{"title":"在美国成年人中,社会人口统计学和吸烟特征与“有机”和“无添加剂”烟草制品的低感知危害相关。","authors":"Cara Drake, Katherine Starcevich, Olivia Wackowski, Stefanie K Gratale, Ollie Ganz, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Jennifer L Pearson","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study describes the prevalence and correlates of beliefs that \"organic\" and \"additive-free\" tobacco products are less harmful than conventional tobacco products among US adults, stratified by smoking status and preference for Natural American Spirit (NAS), a brand that uses \"organic\" and historically used \"additive-free.\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 6 data (n = 29 516) for adults aged 18+ years and generated weighted prevalence estimates. We used weighted logistic regressions to model the odds of believing organic/additive-free tobacco products are \"less harmful\" versus \"about the same\" or \"more harmful.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 10.0% of adults, 15.3% of adults who smoke cigarettes, and 34.0% of adults who smoke NAS believed \"organic\" tobacco products were less harmful, with similar findings for \"additive-free.\" Belief that \"organic\" products were less harmful was greater among people who were ages 18-34 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 1.9) or 35-54 (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.6), were Black (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.5), currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.3), or formerly smoke (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6). Belief that \"additive-free\" products were less harmful was greater among males (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) and people aged 18-34 (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5), who currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.4) or who formerly smoke (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many adults who smoke, particularly those who smoke NAS, believe organic and additive-free tobacco products are less harmful than regular cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>In light of recent changes in the tobacco marketing environment, this study provides an update on harm perceptions from \"organic\" and \"additive-free\" cigarette product descriptors. Results indicate that many US adults continue to believe that \"organic\" and \"additive-free\" tobacco products are less harmful tobacco products. These beliefs may continue to mislead people, as they are more prevalent among young people, people who identify as Black, males, people who smoke cigarettes, and those who smoke NAS cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographic and Smoking Characteristics Associated With Low Perceived Harm of \\\"Organic\\\" and \\\"Additive-Free\\\" Tobacco Products Among US Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Cara Drake, Katherine Starcevich, Olivia Wackowski, Stefanie K Gratale, Ollie Ganz, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Jennifer L Pearson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study describes the prevalence and correlates of beliefs that \\\"organic\\\" and \\\"additive-free\\\" tobacco products are less harmful than conventional tobacco products among US adults, stratified by smoking status and preference for Natural American Spirit (NAS), a brand that uses \\\"organic\\\" and historically used \\\"additive-free.\\\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 6 data (n = 29 516) for adults aged 18+ years and generated weighted prevalence estimates. We used weighted logistic regressions to model the odds of believing organic/additive-free tobacco products are \\\"less harmful\\\" versus \\\"about the same\\\" or \\\"more harmful.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 10.0% of adults, 15.3% of adults who smoke cigarettes, and 34.0% of adults who smoke NAS believed \\\"organic\\\" tobacco products were less harmful, with similar findings for \\\"additive-free.\\\" Belief that \\\"organic\\\" products were less harmful was greater among people who were ages 18-34 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 1.9) or 35-54 (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.6), were Black (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.5), currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.3), or formerly smoke (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6). Belief that \\\"additive-free\\\" products were less harmful was greater among males (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) and people aged 18-34 (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5), who currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.4) or who formerly smoke (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many adults who smoke, particularly those who smoke NAS, believe organic and additive-free tobacco products are less harmful than regular cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>In light of recent changes in the tobacco marketing environment, this study provides an update on harm perceptions from \\\"organic\\\" and \\\"additive-free\\\" cigarette product descriptors. Results indicate that many US adults continue to believe that \\\"organic\\\" and \\\"additive-free\\\" tobacco products are less harmful tobacco products. These beliefs may continue to mislead people, as they are more prevalent among young people, people who identify as Black, males, people who smoke cigarettes, and those who smoke NAS cigarettes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae289\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociodemographic and Smoking Characteristics Associated With Low Perceived Harm of "Organic" and "Additive-Free" Tobacco Products Among US Adults.
Introduction: This study describes the prevalence and correlates of beliefs that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than conventional tobacco products among US adults, stratified by smoking status and preference for Natural American Spirit (NAS), a brand that uses "organic" and historically used "additive-free."
Methods: We analyzed Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 6 data (n = 29 516) for adults aged 18+ years and generated weighted prevalence estimates. We used weighted logistic regressions to model the odds of believing organic/additive-free tobacco products are "less harmful" versus "about the same" or "more harmful."
Results: Overall, 10.0% of adults, 15.3% of adults who smoke cigarettes, and 34.0% of adults who smoke NAS believed "organic" tobacco products were less harmful, with similar findings for "additive-free." Belief that "organic" products were less harmful was greater among people who were ages 18-34 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 1.9) or 35-54 (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.6), were Black (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.5), currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.3), or formerly smoke (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6). Belief that "additive-free" products were less harmful was greater among males (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) and people aged 18-34 (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5), who currently smoke (aOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7, 2.4) or who formerly smoke (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.0).
Conclusions: Many adults who smoke, particularly those who smoke NAS, believe organic and additive-free tobacco products are less harmful than regular cigarettes.
Implications: In light of recent changes in the tobacco marketing environment, this study provides an update on harm perceptions from "organic" and "additive-free" cigarette product descriptors. Results indicate that many US adults continue to believe that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful tobacco products. These beliefs may continue to mislead people, as they are more prevalent among young people, people who identify as Black, males, people who smoke cigarettes, and those who smoke NAS cigarettes.
期刊介绍:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco.
It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas.
Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.