上尿路尿路上皮癌内窥镜检查评分:对影响上尿路尿路上皮癌内窥镜手术的变量进行客观测量的开发和内部验证。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004383
Suzanne Lange, Alec Reinhardt, Daniel Igel, Craig Labbate, Mehrad Adibi, Suprateek Kundu, Surena F Matin
{"title":"上尿路尿路上皮癌内窥镜检查评分:对影响上尿路尿路上皮癌内窥镜手术的变量进行客观测量的开发和内部验证。","authors":"Suzanne Lange, Alec Reinhardt, Daniel Igel, Craig Labbate, Mehrad Adibi, Suprateek Kundu, Surena F Matin","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endoscopic management (EM) is an increasingly accepted option for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Feasibility can be dependent on a variety of variables. The objective of this study was to identify anatomic and phenotypic tumor characteristics that affect EM, using structured expert forecasting, develop and obtain consensus on an assessment score, and perform initial validation of the score in a retrospective database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi method to elicit expert opinions, develop a scale, and gain consensus. Two survey rounds identified 5 consensus categories from which the Upper anatomic Tract, tumor Radius, tumor Architecture, tumor Count, tumor locaTion (TRACT) Endometry Score was created. An institutional UTUC database was used for initial validation. Patients with low-grade or high-grade UTUC undergoing EM were included. The Upper TRACT Endometry Score was calculated based on variables present at initial ureteroscopy. The primary outcome was extent of procedures received defined as a categorical, ordinal scale. The association of the Upper TRACT Endometry Score with outcomes was evaluated using multivariable ordinal logistic regression and exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty international endourologic and urologic oncology experts participated in the surveys. One hundred ten renal units (102 patients) were identified for validation. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression demonstrated that as the Upper TRACT Endometry Score increases, the likelihood of requiring a more intensive intervention increases. The Fisher exact test suggested a significant relationship between the Upper TRACT Endometry Score and procedures received (<i>P</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Upper TRACT Endometry Score is a straightforward tool that with additional validation could be used to help counsel patients and to standardize reporting of variables that may affect EM of UTUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"467-474"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Upper TRACT Endometry Score: Development and Internal Validation of an Objective Measure of Variables That Affect Endoscopic Procedures for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne Lange, Alec Reinhardt, Daniel Igel, Craig Labbate, Mehrad Adibi, Suprateek Kundu, Surena F Matin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endoscopic management (EM) is an increasingly accepted option for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Feasibility can be dependent on a variety of variables. The objective of this study was to identify anatomic and phenotypic tumor characteristics that affect EM, using structured expert forecasting, develop and obtain consensus on an assessment score, and perform initial validation of the score in a retrospective database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi method to elicit expert opinions, develop a scale, and gain consensus. Two survey rounds identified 5 consensus categories from which the Upper anatomic Tract, tumor Radius, tumor Architecture, tumor Count, tumor locaTion (TRACT) Endometry Score was created. An institutional UTUC database was used for initial validation. Patients with low-grade or high-grade UTUC undergoing EM were included. The Upper TRACT Endometry Score was calculated based on variables present at initial ureteroscopy. The primary outcome was extent of procedures received defined as a categorical, ordinal scale. The association of the Upper TRACT Endometry Score with outcomes was evaluated using multivariable ordinal logistic regression and exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty international endourologic and urologic oncology experts participated in the surveys. One hundred ten renal units (102 patients) were identified for validation. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression demonstrated that as the Upper TRACT Endometry Score increases, the likelihood of requiring a more intensive intervention increases. The Fisher exact test suggested a significant relationship between the Upper TRACT Endometry Score and procedures received (<i>P</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Upper TRACT Endometry Score is a straightforward tool that with additional validation could be used to help counsel patients and to standardize reporting of variables that may affect EM of UTUC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"467-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004383\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC),内镜治疗(EM)越来越被接受。其可行性取决于多种变量。本研究的目的是利用结构化专家预测法确定影响内镜下治疗的肿瘤解剖和表型特征,制定评估评分并达成共识,并在回顾性数据库中对评分进行初步验证:我们采用改良德尔菲法征求专家意见、制定量表并达成共识。两轮调查确定了 5 个共识类别,并据此创建了上 TRACT 内径测量评分。机构 UTUC 数据库用于初步验证。接受EM检查的低级别或高级别UTUC患者均包括在内。根据初次输尿管镜检查时存在的变量计算出上TRACT内径测量评分。主要结果是接受手术的程度,定义为分类序数量表。采用多变量序数逻辑回归和Exact检验评估了上TRACT内径测量评分与结果的相关性:结果:30 位国际内镜学和泌尿肿瘤学专家参与了调查。110个肾单位(102名患者)被确定为验证对象。多变量序数逻辑回归表明,随着上TRACT内径测量评分的增加,需要进行更深入干预的可能性也会增加。费舍尔精确检验表明,上TRACT内径测量评分与接受的手术之间存在显著关系(P=0.004):上TRACT内径测量评分是一种简单明了的工具,经过进一步验证后可用于帮助为患者提供咨询,并对可能影响UTUC内镜管理的变量进行标准化报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Upper TRACT Endometry Score: Development and Internal Validation of an Objective Measure of Variables That Affect Endoscopic Procedures for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Purpose: Endoscopic management (EM) is an increasingly accepted option for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Feasibility can be dependent on a variety of variables. The objective of this study was to identify anatomic and phenotypic tumor characteristics that affect EM, using structured expert forecasting, develop and obtain consensus on an assessment score, and perform initial validation of the score in a retrospective database.

Materials and methods: We used a modified Delphi method to elicit expert opinions, develop a scale, and gain consensus. Two survey rounds identified 5 consensus categories from which the Upper anatomic Tract, tumor Radius, tumor Architecture, tumor Count, tumor locaTion (TRACT) Endometry Score was created. An institutional UTUC database was used for initial validation. Patients with low-grade or high-grade UTUC undergoing EM were included. The Upper TRACT Endometry Score was calculated based on variables present at initial ureteroscopy. The primary outcome was extent of procedures received defined as a categorical, ordinal scale. The association of the Upper TRACT Endometry Score with outcomes was evaluated using multivariable ordinal logistic regression and exact tests.

Results: Thirty international endourologic and urologic oncology experts participated in the surveys. One hundred ten renal units (102 patients) were identified for validation. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression demonstrated that as the Upper TRACT Endometry Score increases, the likelihood of requiring a more intensive intervention increases. The Fisher exact test suggested a significant relationship between the Upper TRACT Endometry Score and procedures received (P = .004).

Conclusions: The Upper TRACT Endometry Score is a straightforward tool that with additional validation could be used to help counsel patients and to standardize reporting of variables that may affect EM of UTUC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信