非计划透析开始的危险因素的最新系统综述。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae333
Winnie Magadi, Kate Birnie, Shalini Santhakumaran, Fergus J Caskey, Yoav Ben-Shlomo
{"title":"非计划透析开始的危险因素的最新系统综述。","authors":"Winnie Magadi, Kate Birnie, Shalini Santhakumaran, Fergus J Caskey, Yoav Ben-Shlomo","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previously, a comprehensive review of the risk factors for unplanned dialysis initiation (UDI) was conducted by Hassan <i>et al.</i> (2019), based on studies published up to the end of 2017. They demonstrated that high-quality data and well-designed studies on the subject are lacking. Thus we updated their review to establish the modifiable factors associated with UDI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and Embase were searched from January 2018 to August 2023. Following several rounds of screening, we identified 17 international studies (the majority of which were based in Europe) that met the eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many of the included studies were well designed, utilised large datasets and adopted properly adjusted analyses to examine associations between patient characteristics and UDI. Definitions of UDI varied across studies, i.e. timeliness of presentation, vascular access type, initiating dialysis as an inpatient/outpatient or for life-threatening indications. The most common risk factors reported were cardiovascular disease, older age, lower body mass index, cause of kidney disease, cancer, diabetes, lower serum albumin, faster decline in kidney function and fewer number of nephrology visits prior to dialysis start. These were in line with those reported by Hassan <i>et al.</i>, however, our updated review revealed several other important predictors of UDI, e.g. worse coding of chronic kidney disease in the general practitioner health record, lower health literacy and having acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review provides new insights into reasons why people start dialysis in an unplanned manner, many of which are modifiable, thus contributing to efforts in reducing the rate of UDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"17 12","pages":"sfae333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An updated systematic review of the risk factors for unplanned dialysis initiation.\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Magadi, Kate Birnie, Shalini Santhakumaran, Fergus J Caskey, Yoav Ben-Shlomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfae333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previously, a comprehensive review of the risk factors for unplanned dialysis initiation (UDI) was conducted by Hassan <i>et al.</i> (2019), based on studies published up to the end of 2017. They demonstrated that high-quality data and well-designed studies on the subject are lacking. Thus we updated their review to establish the modifiable factors associated with UDI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and Embase were searched from January 2018 to August 2023. Following several rounds of screening, we identified 17 international studies (the majority of which were based in Europe) that met the eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many of the included studies were well designed, utilised large datasets and adopted properly adjusted analyses to examine associations between patient characteristics and UDI. Definitions of UDI varied across studies, i.e. timeliness of presentation, vascular access type, initiating dialysis as an inpatient/outpatient or for life-threatening indications. The most common risk factors reported were cardiovascular disease, older age, lower body mass index, cause of kidney disease, cancer, diabetes, lower serum albumin, faster decline in kidney function and fewer number of nephrology visits prior to dialysis start. These were in line with those reported by Hassan <i>et al.</i>, however, our updated review revealed several other important predictors of UDI, e.g. worse coding of chronic kidney disease in the general practitioner health record, lower health literacy and having acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review provides new insights into reasons why people start dialysis in an unplanned manner, many of which are modifiable, thus contributing to efforts in reducing the rate of UDI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 12\",\"pages\":\"sfae333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635165/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae333\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:此前,Hassan等人(2019)基于截至2017年底发表的研究,对非计划透析启动(UDI)的风险因素进行了全面审查。他们表明,在这个问题上缺乏高质量的数据和精心设计的研究。因此,我们更新了他们的综述,以确定与UDI相关的可改变因素。方法:检索2018年1月至2023年8月的MEDLINE和Embase数据库。经过几轮筛选,我们确定了17项符合资格标准的国际研究(其中大部分位于欧洲)。结果:许多纳入的研究设计良好,利用大数据集,并采用适当调整的分析来检查患者特征与UDI之间的关系。不同研究对UDI的定义各不相同,如表现的及时性、血管通路类型、作为住院/门诊患者或因危及生命的适应症而开始透析。最常见的危险因素是心血管疾病、年龄较大、身体质量指数较低、肾脏疾病的原因、癌症、糖尿病、血清白蛋白较低、肾功能下降较快以及透析开始前肾脏科就诊次数较少。这些与Hassan等人的报告一致,然而,我们更新的综述揭示了UDI的其他几个重要预测因素,例如,全科医生健康记录中慢性肾脏疾病的编码较差,健康素养较低和急性肾损伤。结论:我们的综述为人们以计划外的方式开始透析的原因提供了新的见解,其中许多是可以改变的,从而有助于降低UDI的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An updated systematic review of the risk factors for unplanned dialysis initiation.

Background: Previously, a comprehensive review of the risk factors for unplanned dialysis initiation (UDI) was conducted by Hassan et al. (2019), based on studies published up to the end of 2017. They demonstrated that high-quality data and well-designed studies on the subject are lacking. Thus we updated their review to establish the modifiable factors associated with UDI.

Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from January 2018 to August 2023. Following several rounds of screening, we identified 17 international studies (the majority of which were based in Europe) that met the eligibility criteria.

Results: Many of the included studies were well designed, utilised large datasets and adopted properly adjusted analyses to examine associations between patient characteristics and UDI. Definitions of UDI varied across studies, i.e. timeliness of presentation, vascular access type, initiating dialysis as an inpatient/outpatient or for life-threatening indications. The most common risk factors reported were cardiovascular disease, older age, lower body mass index, cause of kidney disease, cancer, diabetes, lower serum albumin, faster decline in kidney function and fewer number of nephrology visits prior to dialysis start. These were in line with those reported by Hassan et al., however, our updated review revealed several other important predictors of UDI, e.g. worse coding of chronic kidney disease in the general practitioner health record, lower health literacy and having acute kidney injury.

Conclusions: Our review provides new insights into reasons why people start dialysis in an unplanned manner, many of which are modifiable, thus contributing to efforts in reducing the rate of UDI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信