通过h2s -甲烷重整对h2s -氢在可持续燃料生产中的作用的生命周期评估。

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kalppana Chelvam , Marlia M. Hanafiah , Ismail I.I. Alkhatib , Sawsan M. Ali , Lourdes F. Vega
{"title":"通过h2s -甲烷重整对h2s -氢在可持续燃料生产中的作用的生命周期评估。","authors":"Kalppana Chelvam ,&nbsp;Marlia M. Hanafiah ,&nbsp;Ismail I.I. Alkhatib ,&nbsp;Sawsan M. Ali ,&nbsp;Lourdes F. Vega","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Meeting current decarbonization targets requires a shift to a hydrogen energy nexus, yet, water is a valuable resource for hydrogen production, shifting the perspective to the use of H<sub>2</sub>S instead within the context of circular economy. A comprehensive understanding of the environmental impacts, using a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA), was developed focusing on the operation of hydrogen sulfide-methane reforming (H<sub>2</sub>SMR) for H<sub>2</sub> production benchmarked to conventional technologies, steam methane reforming (SMR) and SMR + carbon capture (CC), as feedstock to produce sustainable fuels (<em>i.e.,</em> methanol and ammonia). The environmental impact of the different application routes was evaluated in terms of normalized impact categories and monetized indicators by calculating the environmental damage cost. The results indicated that the environmental impact increased when moving from H<sub>2</sub>SMR &lt; SMR + CC &lt; SMR, and ammonia compared to methanol production. Across all the processing schemes, the impact on human health is the largest based on the normalized values, representing 63.0–85.0 % of endpoint level impacts. Within the scope of climate change, the use of H<sub>2</sub>SMR is indeed more supportive of climate mitigation efforts, reducing environmental costs related to GWP by 58.0 % from SMR and 12.0 % from SMR + CC. Addressing these concerns demands a comprehensive overhaul of existing practices within the oil and gas sector concerning raw material extraction, coupled with the implementation of effective waste management strategies to significantly minimize adverse environmental effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"958 ","pages":"Article 177879"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment on the role of H2S-based hydrogen via H2S-methane reforming for the production of sustainable fuels\",\"authors\":\"Kalppana Chelvam ,&nbsp;Marlia M. Hanafiah ,&nbsp;Ismail I.I. Alkhatib ,&nbsp;Sawsan M. Ali ,&nbsp;Lourdes F. Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Meeting current decarbonization targets requires a shift to a hydrogen energy nexus, yet, water is a valuable resource for hydrogen production, shifting the perspective to the use of H<sub>2</sub>S instead within the context of circular economy. A comprehensive understanding of the environmental impacts, using a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA), was developed focusing on the operation of hydrogen sulfide-methane reforming (H<sub>2</sub>SMR) for H<sub>2</sub> production benchmarked to conventional technologies, steam methane reforming (SMR) and SMR + carbon capture (CC), as feedstock to produce sustainable fuels (<em>i.e.,</em> methanol and ammonia). The environmental impact of the different application routes was evaluated in terms of normalized impact categories and monetized indicators by calculating the environmental damage cost. The results indicated that the environmental impact increased when moving from H<sub>2</sub>SMR &lt; SMR + CC &lt; SMR, and ammonia compared to methanol production. Across all the processing schemes, the impact on human health is the largest based on the normalized values, representing 63.0–85.0 % of endpoint level impacts. Within the scope of climate change, the use of H<sub>2</sub>SMR is indeed more supportive of climate mitigation efforts, reducing environmental costs related to GWP by 58.0 % from SMR and 12.0 % from SMR + CC. Addressing these concerns demands a comprehensive overhaul of existing practices within the oil and gas sector concerning raw material extraction, coupled with the implementation of effective waste management strategies to significantly minimize adverse environmental effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"958 \",\"pages\":\"Article 177879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724080367\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724080367","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现当前的脱碳目标,需要转向氢能关系,然而,水是制氢的宝贵资源,因此在循环经济的背景下,将观点转向使用H2S。利用从摇篮到门的生命周期评估(LCA),对环境影响进行了全面的了解,重点研究了硫化氢-甲烷重整(H2SMR)的氢气生产,以传统技术为基准,蒸汽甲烷重整(SMR)和SMR +碳捕集(CC),作为生产可持续燃料(即甲醇和氨)的原料。通过计算环境损害成本,以归一化影响类别和货币化指标对不同应用路线的环境影响进行评价。结果表明,从H2SMR转向H2SMR后,对环境的影响有所增加,2SMR确实更有利于减缓气候变化的努力,将与GWP相关的环境成本从SMR降低了58.0%,从SMR + CC降低了12.0%。要解决这些问题,需要对石油和天然气行业有关原材料开采的现有做法进行全面改革。再加上实施有效的废物管理策略,大大减少对环境的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Life cycle assessment on the role of H2S-based hydrogen via H2S-methane reforming for the production of sustainable fuels

Life cycle assessment on the role of H2S-based hydrogen via H2S-methane reforming for the production of sustainable fuels
Meeting current decarbonization targets requires a shift to a hydrogen energy nexus, yet, water is a valuable resource for hydrogen production, shifting the perspective to the use of H2S instead within the context of circular economy. A comprehensive understanding of the environmental impacts, using a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA), was developed focusing on the operation of hydrogen sulfide-methane reforming (H2SMR) for H2 production benchmarked to conventional technologies, steam methane reforming (SMR) and SMR + carbon capture (CC), as feedstock to produce sustainable fuels (i.e., methanol and ammonia). The environmental impact of the different application routes was evaluated in terms of normalized impact categories and monetized indicators by calculating the environmental damage cost. The results indicated that the environmental impact increased when moving from H2SMR < SMR + CC < SMR, and ammonia compared to methanol production. Across all the processing schemes, the impact on human health is the largest based on the normalized values, representing 63.0–85.0 % of endpoint level impacts. Within the scope of climate change, the use of H2SMR is indeed more supportive of climate mitigation efforts, reducing environmental costs related to GWP by 58.0 % from SMR and 12.0 % from SMR + CC. Addressing these concerns demands a comprehensive overhaul of existing practices within the oil and gas sector concerning raw material extraction, coupled with the implementation of effective waste management strategies to significantly minimize adverse environmental effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信