肠道微生物群与心房颤动的因果关系:一项双样本孟德尔随机研究。

Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36660/abc.20240357
Yuan Zhou, Xuan Wang, Jiongchao Guo, Lei Zhang, Huangsheng Zheng
{"title":"肠道微生物群与心房颤动的因果关系:一项双样本孟德尔随机研究。","authors":"Yuan Zhou, Xuan Wang, Jiongchao Guo, Lei Zhang, Huangsheng Zheng","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have adequately characterized the gut microbiota (GM) in atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, the precise causality between GM and AF remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study utilized public data from genome-wide association studies to explore the causality between GM and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first of two rounds of Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, the instrumental variables (IVs) comprised single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that fell below the genome-wide statistical significance threshold (5 × 10-8). To attain a more comprehensive and inclusive conclusion, we further selected SNPs falling below the locus-wide significance level (1 × 10-5) as IVs for the second group. The MR analysis considered the statistically significant causal effect between the specific GM and AF when p < 0.05. Furthermore, in sensitivity analysis, p > 0.05 indicated no heterogeneity and pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the locus-wide significance threshold, the findings demonstrated a causal impact of GM on AF risk. The inverse variance weighting method indicated that Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Alloprevotella, Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Eggerthella, Howardella, Ruminococcaceae UCG004, and Ruminococcus1 were negatively correlated with AF, while Pasteurellales, Pasteurellaceae, Oxalobacter, Ruminiclostridium5, and Turicibacter were positively correlated. Furthermore, at the genome-wide significance threshold, Actinobacteria, Bifidobacteriaceae, and Bifidobacterium were protective factors for the risk of developing AF, whereas Oxalobacteraceae and Erysipelatoclostridium were risk factors for AF. However, sensitivity analyses showed heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy within the outcomes for Actinobacteria, Howardella, Oxalobacter, and Firmicutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence for the existence of both favorable and unfavorable causality of GM on AF risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"121 11","pages":"e20240357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Atrial Fibrillation: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Zhou, Xuan Wang, Jiongchao Guo, Lei Zhang, Huangsheng Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.36660/abc.20240357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have adequately characterized the gut microbiota (GM) in atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, the precise causality between GM and AF remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study utilized public data from genome-wide association studies to explore the causality between GM and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first of two rounds of Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, the instrumental variables (IVs) comprised single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that fell below the genome-wide statistical significance threshold (5 × 10-8). To attain a more comprehensive and inclusive conclusion, we further selected SNPs falling below the locus-wide significance level (1 × 10-5) as IVs for the second group. The MR analysis considered the statistically significant causal effect between the specific GM and AF when p < 0.05. Furthermore, in sensitivity analysis, p > 0.05 indicated no heterogeneity and pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the locus-wide significance threshold, the findings demonstrated a causal impact of GM on AF risk. The inverse variance weighting method indicated that Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Alloprevotella, Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Eggerthella, Howardella, Ruminococcaceae UCG004, and Ruminococcus1 were negatively correlated with AF, while Pasteurellales, Pasteurellaceae, Oxalobacter, Ruminiclostridium5, and Turicibacter were positively correlated. Furthermore, at the genome-wide significance threshold, Actinobacteria, Bifidobacteriaceae, and Bifidobacterium were protective factors for the risk of developing AF, whereas Oxalobacteraceae and Erysipelatoclostridium were risk factors for AF. However, sensitivity analyses showed heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy within the outcomes for Actinobacteria, Howardella, Oxalobacter, and Firmicutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence for the existence of both favorable and unfavorable causality of GM on AF risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"121 11\",\"pages\":\"e20240357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的研究已经充分表征了心房颤动(AF)的肠道微生物群(GM)。然而,GM和AF之间的确切因果关系仍然难以捉摸。目的:本研究利用全基因组关联研究的公开数据来探讨转基因与af之间的因果关系。方法:在两轮孟德尔随机化(MR)分析的第一轮中,工具变量(IVs)包括低于全基因组统计显著性阈值(5 × 10-8)的单核苷酸多态性(snp)。为了获得更全面和包容的结论,我们进一步选择低于全位点显著性水平(1 × 10-5)的snp作为第二组的IVs。MR分析认为特异性GM与AF之间的因果关系在p < 0.05时具有统计学意义。在敏感性分析中,p < 0.05表明无异质性和多效性。结果:在全位点显著性阈值下,研究结果表明GM对房颤风险有因果影响。方差逆加权法表明,放线菌、厚壁菌门、异prevotella、双歧杆菌、Blautia、Eggerthella、Howardella、Ruminococcaceae UCG004和Ruminococcus1与AF呈负相关,而巴氏杆菌、巴氏杆菌、草酸杆菌、Ruminiclostridium5和Turicibacter与AF呈正相关。此外,在全基因组显著性阈值下,放线菌、双歧杆菌科和双歧杆菌是发生房颤风险的保护因素,而草藻杆菌科和Erysipelatoclostridium是房颤的危险因素。然而,敏感性分析显示放线菌、Howardella、草藻杆菌和厚壁菌门的结果存在异质性或水平多效性。结论:本研究为GM对房颤风险存在有利和不利的因果关系提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Atrial Fibrillation: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Background: Previous studies have adequately characterized the gut microbiota (GM) in atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, the precise causality between GM and AF remains elusive.

Objectives: This study utilized public data from genome-wide association studies to explore the causality between GM and AF.

Methods: In the first of two rounds of Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, the instrumental variables (IVs) comprised single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that fell below the genome-wide statistical significance threshold (5 × 10-8). To attain a more comprehensive and inclusive conclusion, we further selected SNPs falling below the locus-wide significance level (1 × 10-5) as IVs for the second group. The MR analysis considered the statistically significant causal effect between the specific GM and AF when p < 0.05. Furthermore, in sensitivity analysis, p > 0.05 indicated no heterogeneity and pleiotropy.

Results: At the locus-wide significance threshold, the findings demonstrated a causal impact of GM on AF risk. The inverse variance weighting method indicated that Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Alloprevotella, Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Eggerthella, Howardella, Ruminococcaceae UCG004, and Ruminococcus1 were negatively correlated with AF, while Pasteurellales, Pasteurellaceae, Oxalobacter, Ruminiclostridium5, and Turicibacter were positively correlated. Furthermore, at the genome-wide significance threshold, Actinobacteria, Bifidobacteriaceae, and Bifidobacterium were protective factors for the risk of developing AF, whereas Oxalobacteraceae and Erysipelatoclostridium were risk factors for AF. However, sensitivity analyses showed heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy within the outcomes for Actinobacteria, Howardella, Oxalobacter, and Firmicutes.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence for the existence of both favorable and unfavorable causality of GM on AF risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信