{"title":"Turkish版本修订诺丁汉感官评估：效度和信度在慢性中风幸存者。","authors":"Nurten Bilgin, Gokcen Akyurek","doi":"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors is essential to plan and implement effective treatment and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA-T) in chronic stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the World Health Organization's translation protocols to develop the rNAS-T. We then tested its validity and reliability in 85 chronic stroke survivors using criterion validity and consistency for demographic variables, as well as test-retest and inter-rater reliability analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criterion validity of the rNSA-T was supported by significant correlation between participants' scores on the rNSA-T, the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-AD) (r = 0.430-0.674, P < 0.05), and the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) (r = 0.528-0.773, P < 0.05). rNSA-T results remained consistent across variables of sex and side affected by stroke (P > 0.05). The test-retest reliability of the rNSA-T was excellent in all subdimensions (ICC = 0.865-1.000), as was the inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.875-1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rNSA-T is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50671,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Turkish Version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment: Validity and Reliability in Chronic Stroke Survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Nurten Bilgin, Gokcen Akyurek\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors is essential to plan and implement effective treatment and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA-T) in chronic stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the World Health Organization's translation protocols to develop the rNAS-T. We then tested its validity and reliability in 85 chronic stroke survivors using criterion validity and consistency for demographic variables, as well as test-retest and inter-rater reliability analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criterion validity of the rNSA-T was supported by significant correlation between participants' scores on the rNSA-T, the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-AD) (r = 0.430-0.674, P < 0.05), and the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) (r = 0.528-0.773, P < 0.05). rNSA-T results remained consistent across variables of sex and side affected by stroke (P > 0.05). The test-retest reliability of the rNSA-T was excellent in all subdimensions (ICC = 0.865-1.000), as was the inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.875-1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rNSA-T is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：评估慢性脑卒中幸存者的感觉功能对于计划和实施有效的治疗和康复至关重要。目的：探讨土耳其版修订的诺丁汉感觉评估（rNSA-T）在慢性脑卒中幸存者中的效度和信度。方法：采用世界卫生组织的翻译方案开发rna - t。然后，我们在85名慢性中风幸存者中测试了它的效度和信度，使用了人口学变量的标准效度和一致性，以及测试-重测试和评分者间的信度分析。结果：rNSA-T与Katz日常生活活动独立性指数（Katz- ad）得分（r = 0.43 -0.674, P < 0.05）和Rivermead Motor Assessment （r = 0.528-0.773, P < 0.05）之间存在显著相关，支持rNSA-T的效度。rNSA-T结果在性别和卒中侧位影响变量之间保持一致（P < 0.05）。rNSA-T在所有子维度上的重测信度都很好（ICC = 0.865-1.000），量表间信度也很好（κ = 0.875-1.000）。结论：rNSA-T是评估慢性脑卒中幸存者感觉功能的有效和可靠的工具。
The Turkish Version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment: Validity and Reliability in Chronic Stroke Survivors.
Background: Evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors is essential to plan and implement effective treatment and rehabilitation.
Objective: To investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA-T) in chronic stroke survivors.
Methods: We applied the World Health Organization's translation protocols to develop the rNAS-T. We then tested its validity and reliability in 85 chronic stroke survivors using criterion validity and consistency for demographic variables, as well as test-retest and inter-rater reliability analyses.
Results: The criterion validity of the rNSA-T was supported by significant correlation between participants' scores on the rNSA-T, the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-AD) (r = 0.430-0.674, P < 0.05), and the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) (r = 0.528-0.773, P < 0.05). rNSA-T results remained consistent across variables of sex and side affected by stroke (P > 0.05). The test-retest reliability of the rNSA-T was excellent in all subdimensions (ICC = 0.865-1.000), as was the inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.875-1.000).
Conclusion: The rNSA-T is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of sensory functions in chronic stroke survivors.
期刊介绍：
Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology (CBN) is a forum for advances in the neurologic understanding and possible treatment of human disorders that affect thinking, learning, memory, communication, and behavior. As an incubator for innovations in these fields, CBN helps transform theory into practice. The journal serves clinical research, patient care, education, and professional advancement.
The journal welcomes contributions from neurology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and other relevant fields. The editors particularly encourage review articles (including reviews of clinical practice), experimental and observational case reports, instructional articles for interested students and professionals in other fields, and innovative articles that do not fit neatly into any category. Also welcome are therapeutic trials and other experimental and observational studies, brief reports, first-person accounts of neurologic experiences, position papers, hypotheses, opinion papers, commentaries, historical perspectives, and book reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
