IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jaison Barreto, Patricia Sammarco Rosa, Linda Adams, Zuleima Aguilar, Nyasha Bakare, Sandra R Chaplan, Ruxandra Draghia Akli, Etienne Ernault, Sarah Kulke, Nacer Lounis, Dawn Millington, James A Palmer, Bart Remmerie, Miao Wang, Stephanie Young, Richard Truman, Paula Frassinetti Bessa Rebello
{"title":"Bedaquiline Monotherapy for Multibacillary Leprosy.","authors":"Jaison Barreto, Patricia Sammarco Rosa, Linda Adams, Zuleima Aguilar, Nyasha Bakare, Sandra R Chaplan, Ruxandra Draghia Akli, Etienne Ernault, Sarah Kulke, Nacer Lounis, Dawn Millington, James A Palmer, Bart Remmerie, Miao Wang, Stephanie Young, Richard Truman, Paula Frassinetti Bessa Rebello","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2312928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard multidrug therapy for leprosy may be associated with severe side effects, which add to the stigma and discrimination that affect persons with the disease. In addition, the threat posed by drug-resistant leprosy shows the need for alternative drug combinations and shorter, safer regimens of multidrug therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, proof-of-concept study conducted in Brazil, we assigned patients with previously untreated multibacillary leprosy to receive bedaquiline monotherapy for 8 weeks. After completing the 8-week course of bedaquiline, the patients started standard multidrug therapy (as defined by the World Health Organization) for leprosy and were followed for 112 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the odds of positive growth of <i>Mycobacterium leprae</i> in mouse footpads after 8 weeks of bedaquiline therapy. The secondary end point was safety. Exploratory end points included change in the clinical signs and symptoms of leprosy and in the molecular viability of <i>M. leprae</i> (measured by a quantitative reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of nine patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The odds of positive <i>M. leprae</i> growth had decreased from 100% in all the patients at baseline to no growth after 4 weeks of bedaquiline monotherapy. After 7 weeks of treatment, all the patients showed improvement in the appearance of skin lesions as compared with baseline. Seven patients had at least one adverse event (all grade 1 or 2) during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with multibacillary leprosy, bedaquiline monotherapy cleared <i>M. leprae</i> by 4 weeks of treatment and led to improvement in the appearance of skin lesions by 7 weeks. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03384641.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"391 23","pages":"2212-2218"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2312928","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻风病的标准多种药物疗法可能会产生严重的副作用,这加剧了对麻风病人的羞辱和歧视。此外,耐药性麻风病所带来的威胁表明,我们需要替代药物组合以及更短、更安全的多种药物治疗方案:在巴西进行的这项开放标签、概念验证研究中,我们让既往未经治疗的多疱性麻风病人接受贝达喹啉单药治疗,疗程为8周。完成 8 周的贝达喹啉疗程后,患者开始接受麻风病标准多药疗法(根据世界卫生组织的定义),并接受 112 周的随访。主要终点是贝达喹啉治疗8周后小鼠脚垫中麻风分枝杆菌阳性生长几率与基线相比的变化。次要终点是安全性。探索性终点包括麻风病临床症状和体征的变化以及麻风分枝杆菌分子活力的变化(通过反转录酶聚合酶链式反应定量测定):结果:共有九名患者被纳入修改后的意向治疗分析。在贝达喹啉单药治疗 4 周后,所有患者的麻风杆菌阳性生长几率从基线时的 100% 降至无生长。治疗 7 周后,与基线相比,所有患者的皮损外观都有所改善。7名患者在治疗期间至少出现了一次不良反应(均为1级或2级):结论:对于多脓疱型麻风病患者,贝达喹啉单药治疗可在治疗4周后清除麻风杆菌,并在治疗7周后改善皮损外观。(由杨森研发公司资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03384641)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bedaquiline Monotherapy for Multibacillary Leprosy.

Background: Standard multidrug therapy for leprosy may be associated with severe side effects, which add to the stigma and discrimination that affect persons with the disease. In addition, the threat posed by drug-resistant leprosy shows the need for alternative drug combinations and shorter, safer regimens of multidrug therapy.

Methods: In this open-label, proof-of-concept study conducted in Brazil, we assigned patients with previously untreated multibacillary leprosy to receive bedaquiline monotherapy for 8 weeks. After completing the 8-week course of bedaquiline, the patients started standard multidrug therapy (as defined by the World Health Organization) for leprosy and were followed for 112 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the odds of positive growth of Mycobacterium leprae in mouse footpads after 8 weeks of bedaquiline therapy. The secondary end point was safety. Exploratory end points included change in the clinical signs and symptoms of leprosy and in the molecular viability of M. leprae (measured by a quantitative reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay).

Results: A total of nine patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The odds of positive M. leprae growth had decreased from 100% in all the patients at baseline to no growth after 4 weeks of bedaquiline monotherapy. After 7 weeks of treatment, all the patients showed improvement in the appearance of skin lesions as compared with baseline. Seven patients had at least one adverse event (all grade 1 or 2) during treatment.

Conclusions: In patients with multibacillary leprosy, bedaquiline monotherapy cleared M. leprae by 4 weeks of treatment and led to improvement in the appearance of skin lesions by 7 weeks. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03384641.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信