手伸高度对脊髓损伤的轮椅使用者肩袖压缩风险的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Journal of Applied Biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-12-11 Print Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1123/jab.2023-0256
Kylee M Schaffer, Stefan I Madansingh, Emma Fortune, Melissa M Morrow, Kristin D Zhao, Beth A Cloud-Biebl
{"title":"手伸高度对脊髓损伤的轮椅使用者肩袖压缩风险的影响。","authors":"Kylee M Schaffer, Stefan I Madansingh, Emma Fortune, Melissa M Morrow, Kristin D Zhao, Beth A Cloud-Biebl","doi":"10.1123/jab.2023-0256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reaching is a common daily activity requiring a range of humeral elevation that contributes to rotator cuff compression. The purpose of this study was to estimate supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon compression risk relative to the acromion and coracoacromial ligament during reaching by manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate 8 participants (7 males, median [range] age 36 y [23-61]). Electromagnetic motion capture recorded shoulder kinematics while participants reached for a can at 2 heights: low (0.91 m) and high (1.37 m). Using 1 set of computed tomographic-based bone models and individual glenohumeral kinematics, compression risk was evaluated as the percentage of the reach activity and number of seconds that tendon insertions were less than 5 mm from scapular landmarks. Reach conditions were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = .05). Although not statistically significant, the supraspinatus and infraspinatus relative to the acromion had approximately 40% of the activity duration or 0.8 seconds more time under 5 mm in low versus high reach, indicating increased risk of compression. Compression risk estimates were consistent with prior publications on planar arm movements. Estimating the risk of tendon compression using absolute time may help with understanding cumulative exposure during day-to-day activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Reach Height on Estimated Rotator Cuff Compression Risk in Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Kylee M Schaffer, Stefan I Madansingh, Emma Fortune, Melissa M Morrow, Kristin D Zhao, Beth A Cloud-Biebl\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jab.2023-0256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reaching is a common daily activity requiring a range of humeral elevation that contributes to rotator cuff compression. The purpose of this study was to estimate supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon compression risk relative to the acromion and coracoacromial ligament during reaching by manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate 8 participants (7 males, median [range] age 36 y [23-61]). Electromagnetic motion capture recorded shoulder kinematics while participants reached for a can at 2 heights: low (0.91 m) and high (1.37 m). Using 1 set of computed tomographic-based bone models and individual glenohumeral kinematics, compression risk was evaluated as the percentage of the reach activity and number of seconds that tendon insertions were less than 5 mm from scapular landmarks. Reach conditions were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = .05). Although not statistically significant, the supraspinatus and infraspinatus relative to the acromion had approximately 40% of the activity duration or 0.8 seconds more time under 5 mm in low versus high reach, indicating increased risk of compression. Compression risk estimates were consistent with prior publications on planar arm movements. Estimating the risk of tendon compression using absolute time may help with understanding cumulative exposure during day-to-day activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"27-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伸展是一种常见的日常活动,需要一定范围的肱骨抬高,这有助于肩袖压缩。本研究的目的是评估在脊髓损伤的手动轮椅使用者到达时,相对于肩峰和喙峰韧带,冈上和冈下肌腱受到压迫的风险。采用横断面设计对8名参与者进行评估(7名男性,中位年龄36岁[23-61])。电磁运动捕捉记录了参与者在低(0.91米)和高(1.37米)两种高度时的肩部运动学。使用一套基于计算机断层扫描的骨骼模型和个人肩关节运动学,通过到达活动的百分比和肌腱插入距离肩胛骨标记小于5毫米的秒数来评估压缩风险。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较到达条件(α = 0.05)。尽管没有统计学意义,冈上肌和冈下肌相对于肩峰的活动时间约为40%,在5毫米下低伸比高伸多0.8秒,表明压迫风险增加。压缩风险估计与先前关于平面手臂运动的出版物一致。使用绝对时间估计肌腱受压的风险可能有助于了解日常活动中的累积暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Reach Height on Estimated Rotator Cuff Compression Risk in Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.

Reaching is a common daily activity requiring a range of humeral elevation that contributes to rotator cuff compression. The purpose of this study was to estimate supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon compression risk relative to the acromion and coracoacromial ligament during reaching by manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate 8 participants (7 males, median [range] age 36 y [23-61]). Electromagnetic motion capture recorded shoulder kinematics while participants reached for a can at 2 heights: low (0.91 m) and high (1.37 m). Using 1 set of computed tomographic-based bone models and individual glenohumeral kinematics, compression risk was evaluated as the percentage of the reach activity and number of seconds that tendon insertions were less than 5 mm from scapular landmarks. Reach conditions were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = .05). Although not statistically significant, the supraspinatus and infraspinatus relative to the acromion had approximately 40% of the activity duration or 0.8 seconds more time under 5 mm in low versus high reach, indicating increased risk of compression. Compression risk estimates were consistent with prior publications on planar arm movements. Estimating the risk of tendon compression using absolute time may help with understanding cumulative exposure during day-to-day activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信