评价发表在儿科牙科期刊上的随机对照试验摘要中的旋转。

Q3 Dentistry
Arun Kumar Patnana, Cheranjeevi Jayam, Neeraj Kumar, Satya Narain, Mohit Galani, Pravin Kumar
{"title":"评价发表在儿科牙科期刊上的随机对照试验摘要中的旋转。","authors":"Arun Kumar Patnana, Cheranjeevi Jayam, Neeraj Kumar, Satya Narain, Mohit Galani, Pravin Kumar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>The term \"spin\" in biomedical journals refers to reporting strategies that misinterpret actual results and mislead readers toward viewing a drug or treatment in a more favorable or less favorable manner. The study aimed to evaluate the presence of spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in the Department of Dentistry at a tertiary care hospital from April to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals from January 2010 to December 2022 were included. A literature search was performed by two independent reviewers according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The abstracts of the included articles were evaluated to identify spin. The method described by Boutron et al. was followed to define and identify spin. Data summary statistics of the included studies were calculated using Google Sheets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search in PubMed resulted in 3,566 articles. According to the eligibility criteria, 327 articles were included and analyzed for spin in the abstracts. A total of 10 out of 327 (3%) articles showed spin in the abstracts. Randomized controlled trials evaluating pulpotomy as an intervention exhibited the most spin. The majority of abstracts with spin showed a discrepancy in the presentation of results and the conclusion section.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of spin is evident in 3% of PubMed-indexed Pediatric Dentistry journals published from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Clinicians should be careful when implying the observations of abstracts of RCTs to the clinical scenario, considering the presence of spin.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Patnana AK, Jayam C, Kumar N, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Spin in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Pediatric Dentistry Journals. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(9):1071-1074.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 9","pages":"1071-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Spin in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Pediatric Dentistry Journals.\",\"authors\":\"Arun Kumar Patnana, Cheranjeevi Jayam, Neeraj Kumar, Satya Narain, Mohit Galani, Pravin Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>The term \\\"spin\\\" in biomedical journals refers to reporting strategies that misinterpret actual results and mislead readers toward viewing a drug or treatment in a more favorable or less favorable manner. The study aimed to evaluate the presence of spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in the Department of Dentistry at a tertiary care hospital from April to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals from January 2010 to December 2022 were included. A literature search was performed by two independent reviewers according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The abstracts of the included articles were evaluated to identify spin. The method described by Boutron et al. was followed to define and identify spin. Data summary statistics of the included studies were calculated using Google Sheets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search in PubMed resulted in 3,566 articles. According to the eligibility criteria, 327 articles were included and analyzed for spin in the abstracts. A total of 10 out of 327 (3%) articles showed spin in the abstracts. Randomized controlled trials evaluating pulpotomy as an intervention exhibited the most spin. The majority of abstracts with spin showed a discrepancy in the presentation of results and the conclusion section.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of spin is evident in 3% of PubMed-indexed Pediatric Dentistry journals published from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Clinicians should be careful when implying the observations of abstracts of RCTs to the clinical scenario, considering the presence of spin.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Patnana AK, Jayam C, Kumar N, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Spin in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Pediatric Dentistry Journals. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(9):1071-1074.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"1071-1074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和背景:生物医学期刊中的“spin”一词是指曲解实际结果并误导读者以更有利或更不利的方式看待药物或治疗的报道策略。该研究旨在评估发表在pubmed索引的儿科牙科期刊上的随机对照试验(rct)摘要中旋转的存在。方法:研究于2023年4 - 6月在某三级医院牙内科进行。纳入2010年1月至2022年12月在pubmed检索的儿科牙科期刊上发表的随机对照试验。由两名独立的审稿人根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准进行文献检索。对纳入文章的摘要进行评价以确定是否存在自旋。采用Boutron等人描述的方法定义和识别自旋。采用谷歌Sheets计算纳入研究的数据汇总统计。结果:在PubMed的初步搜索结果是3566篇文章。根据入选标准,327篇文章被纳入摘要并进行spin分析。327篇文章中有10篇(3%)在摘要中出现了spin。评价髓质切开术作为干预措施的随机对照试验显示出最大的旋转。大多数自旋摘要在结果呈现和结论部分存在差异。结论:2010年至2022年出版的pubmed索引儿科牙科期刊中,有3%的期刊明显存在自旋。临床意义:考虑到自旋的存在,临床医生在将随机对照试验摘要的观察结果与临床情况相关联时应谨慎。如何引用本文:Patnana AK, Jayam C, Kumar N,等。评价发表在儿科牙科期刊上的随机对照试验摘要中的旋转。中华临床儿科杂志;2009;17(9):1071-1074。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Spin in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Pediatric Dentistry Journals.

Aim and background: The term "spin" in biomedical journals refers to reporting strategies that misinterpret actual results and mislead readers toward viewing a drug or treatment in a more favorable or less favorable manner. The study aimed to evaluate the presence of spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals.

Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of Dentistry at a tertiary care hospital from April to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals from January 2010 to December 2022 were included. A literature search was performed by two independent reviewers according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The abstracts of the included articles were evaluated to identify spin. The method described by Boutron et al. was followed to define and identify spin. Data summary statistics of the included studies were calculated using Google Sheets.

Results: The initial search in PubMed resulted in 3,566 articles. According to the eligibility criteria, 327 articles were included and analyzed for spin in the abstracts. A total of 10 out of 327 (3%) articles showed spin in the abstracts. Randomized controlled trials evaluating pulpotomy as an intervention exhibited the most spin. The majority of abstracts with spin showed a discrepancy in the presentation of results and the conclusion section.

Conclusion: The presence of spin is evident in 3% of PubMed-indexed Pediatric Dentistry journals published from 2010 to 2022.

Clinical significance: Clinicians should be careful when implying the observations of abstracts of RCTs to the clinical scenario, considering the presence of spin.

How to cite this article: Patnana AK, Jayam C, Kumar N, et al. Evaluation of Spin in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Pediatric Dentistry Journals. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(9):1071-1074.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信